You give me the impression that you wanted to write something but you had no clue what to write about and you created the crappiest response I ever got in here! Lovely!
Now, this system never was put in real play because 5000-10000 draws is still too much for real play for me. But it has achieved the goal to produce the winning combination in a quite smaller set compared to the amount needed judged by natural chance; this again sort of proves lottery draws are not that random even if approached by filters utilization. Your response really contradicts your own comments about a process that can deliver what would make you feel impressed about; thus decide if you are impressed or not. ECD is not yet ready to go public. The fact that it was designed 10 or so years ago has nothing to do with its performance or if it has done something significant for me. As you know, I work on various projects and of course I have very happy customers who WIN. Adding ECD to the arsenal is now a good move because it will have the required support of WG's feature to utilize mother coverings so to bring that produced amount of blocks even lower if so desired, among other things that have been developed at the other projects. Thus the real delay is due to some more functionality I wanted to embed in there to complement the ECD overall usage. Also, ECD is a complex system that can't go out like that to public. I prefer to delay something even 10 years to polish and improve it as much as I can rather than to rush it out and get negative comments for being hard to use. Actually, I don't care of what you think because when the user get that system with all the supported functionality will realize the benefits of it, thus your whole response here is really in vain and completely wrongly judged. No hard feelings, just be more careful on what you reply given you have no clue why this system was delayed that much.
By the way, what have you done to assist others in their lotto interests besides criticizing in the wrong manner other people efforts? At least, I have a program which I offer for free (Lotto Architect) and two of the most advanced systems (Wheel Generator & GAT Engine) in my attempt to assist players in better playing strategies and ECD will be added in this arsenal. I also design new world record wheels which I make available for free (my most recent ones 19,6,4,5=111 and 20,6,4,5=139) for people to use. Your contribution is... ?
Players using software to pick their numbers want to do more than have fun playing and loosing, they want to win.
That's what I do. What do you do towards that target?