Quote: Originally posted by visiondude on Aug 6, 2010
"Since you've been teaching "how to win jackpots" on LP for 8 years, there must be many happy jackpot winners thanking you daily and I'm sure you can find one of them who will share their winning story with us and explain exactly how your "sig" helped them".
purchase some reading comphrehension skills from truecritic, because all i stated was my example of "levity" provides some people a better perspective on the chasing aspect of the lottery.
leave it to you to twist my words. it's a common tactic used by those when confronted with the "i refuse" of thier lives.
i know one things for sure, you sure haven't helped anyone win a JP. shoot, you cannot even help yourself win the pick3.
*********************************************************************************************
"How could I lie when you won't say for a fact you helped even one person?"
feigned innocence. it's such an endearing quality when attempting to attract someone toward you based on "integrity".
you lied about what i said purposefully, because what i said was right in line with what you stated.
i love archived footage of these "issues", because anyone that picks truth over people/opinions can go back and see that when i called you out on it, it was true.
you don't think you are worth my spilling my hard earned integrity into the gutter over you, do you?
*********************************************************************************************
"Of course that statement alone probably offends many LP members, but that shouldn't bother someone whose purpose and intent seems to be to offend as many members as possible".
oh boy. desperate mode. when people can't answer for their own integrity spillages, they go into "discredit at all costs" mode. been around more than a few blocks with integrity giants like this.
look, i am not here to "offend". if i was, i would be bombing every thread i can get my hands on, so i can take my lack of grammar skills out for a sunday stroll, at anyones expense that happens to be walking on the same side of the street i am.
not my "gig", stack. what is my gig - is my sig. secondary to that, is the questioning of false hope, and whatever that amounts to at that time.
while i don't live to "offend", i certainly don't worry about making mr popularity over "lessening" the truth to give people like you a free pass.
it isn't my fault, if you find yourself on the other side of what's true, whatever that is.
am i "worried" that the majority at LP don't believe what i do about randomness aspects. no. i don't cater "truth" to groups of people, or popularity polls.
i am who i am, and you are free to vote for whoever you want, once somebody resurrects a "whose the most popular poster at LP" - poll.
i know enough about odds / math, that i know it won't be me, and to me, that's ----->
******************************************************************************************
"Oh, you've been providing levity? And I here I though it was just stupidity and for a while stopped responding to you out of pity".
no, actually you "stopped responding to me", when you didn't have anything in the bag, after i demonstrated how lame your excuse was about QP's having to be "purchased". truth is, that's where your integrity left your back pocket. it's going downhill fast from there...
*******************************************************************************************
"Had you stayed focused during 8th grade math, you would easily understand why a 2 if 5 wheel covering all 56 wbs and using all 46 bonus numbers does exactly what its suppose to do; match 2 numbers in one combo and have the winning bonus ball".
my math stinks, no question, but what i lack in math skills, i am completely talented in the "that's a lame excuse/smokecreen/i refuse to do it" parts of life. unlucky for you, i graduated summa cum laude baloney detector, and now you can explain to the board, that while during your above "pontifications" about how it works - you completely chickened out of showing it actually doing it.
truth is stack, i called you out on showing it, and you manufactured a painfully obvious excuse why you "wouldn't"
*******************************************************************************************
"Do you make your students check under the hood to see if there is an engine before getting in the car?"
spoken like a true perspective askewed systems player, much ado about nothing. one turn of the key ought to tell them what they need to know. hey, that parallels the QP thing.
"just one turn of the key, ought to tell you everything you need to know. no sense in going to the library to "study" if the engines beneath the hood". lol
you know though, you have inspired me tonight about "warning" my students about trusting the integrity aspects of "other drivers", and how they should incorporate that into their decision making.
looks like i get to use you as a "scenario" in my lesson plan. that should make you warm and fuzzy toward me :)