"When are you gonna get if through that thick skull of yours that no one has too prove anything too you??
helLOOO. this thread is about "proof".
aka the difference between "systems" and QP's, and if you think you or anybody else is going to make some sweeping comment about the ability to "gain an edge", and i am not going to ask you (or anyone else) to prove it, then you can go sing that tune somewhere else. somewhere where the people assembled in the chorus are on the same musical page.
we all know "you won't", but you are the one that stated it in this thread, so that's not my fault, it be yours.
gee willy. if anything, i would think "if it worked", you guys would be fighting amonst yourselves who would be the "one" to prove it.
doesn't the sound of crickets bother you?
in my world, i depend soley upon proof. because in this world, there is a rediculous amount of time, money and false hope "drainers" out there, and without the baloney detector switch turned on constantly, i would leave myself open to wasting my time and efforts. the baloney detector makes life more efficient. efficientcy is better.
let's say you go to buy a car with money that was hard for you to save. you do your research before, right? then, you compare claims about a "prospective car". joe hot rod states his car is "reliable", and you should get 100,000 miles out of it "trouble free". but smart consumer that you are........you don't trust his claims verbatim, you need to "prove it"
as an "informed consumer", what should you do?............you look up reviews about that particular model, by people that actually drive THAT car, and see what their "experience is".
same thing in here. i was taking "systems" out for a test drive against QP's, and gave the "drivers" of said systems a chance to give a review of their "model" against QP's.
it was met only with the ensuing sound of crickets. can you imagine trying to get an opinion of a person who actually drove the car YOU wanted, and they refused to talk about it.
that's a HUGE red flag
we don't care what you think and we will continue using our methods just like you will continue LOSING with your preferred method
i already knew that, before i asked the question the first time. i have known that for 8 years.
i recognize entrenched wishful thinking when i see it. i told you, it's not people like you i "work for". it's the "on the fence" riders that employ me .
and me.........it's just a matter of time, and my 1QP will do what's it's supposed to do, when i am "meant to" .
FYI, i have NEVER been wrong in knowing what i am "meant to" (yet)
unlike you guys, i posted my "claims" for all LP to see (it's archived. go find it), because i am more than willing to stick my neck out in relation to what i believe and claim. why? because if you can't back up what you claim, why make it in the first place? in the long run.......who does that impress?
i would much rather be that guy that matched my claims, so that when people see me they point at me and say "that guy did what he said he could do......always"
intrinsically speaking.......you can only trust a person who does what they say they can do
i work hard, to be that guy
if someone makes the statement about systems "maybe" giving an edge, that's cool, because i don't mind "possibilities".
but when someone states it as a "fact", the baloney light switch goes on, because no one has proved it yet.
"I personally know players some from this forum who have hit the numbers 1-2 times a week or every other week using some of Steve Players stuff so I know for sure you can have an edge on the game when you apply the tools proplerly"
see what i mean? i told you people say this all the time when pressed about their "supposed abilities"
funny how "those people" are M.I.A. in here.