That's not an insult, it's part of how the brain works, I've been guilty of similar things plenty of times. Fine I've got work anyway so I am done. You know, at first I thought Joker was immature, and you just had a differing view on these matters.
Now I see that you're both immature - because anyone who can't have a debate about simple stuff like this, which IMHO - I shouldn't need to explain - without devolving into calling people who agree with the current accepted models moron, dimwits, etc. really need to grow up.
So both of you - grow up - I told Joker I'd continue the conversation if he stopped turning into a flame fest - and that goes for you to. If you can't help youself but to call somebody a moron for pointing towards the Gamblers Fallacy - or tell me my reading comprehension if pre-K because I ask for proof then I can't see why anyone would want to have a decent conversation with you.
Actually I'd say that's more Pre-K, but whatever, like I said - I'll continue the converstaion if you'll refrain from allowing it devolve into you calling everyone names. Otherwise I'm done - that's way to immature for me.
I'm sure you haven't learned anything from me because you chose not to. But then again, half my posts were just to explain that the burden of proof is on you if you believe your view on the way the world works is correct. Not only have you not addressed this, I've been told that the burden of proof is on me to prove that the world works the way common sense and 100s of years of math and science have concluded. Obviously the math and science are CLOSER to true, unless you can prove that your view is.