I never said that.
It's actually very possible.
If you had a quarter of a brain then you'd understand that my claim is that of course it's possible, it's just not more likely than if you didn't wait out for whatever coniditions you need, since all spins have the same chance of landing anywhere.
Waiting out for 10 spins doesn't make it more likely that the next spin will contain your winner.
There's simply no such thing as a system which changes the house edge of a bet. That's fact. There are plenty of systems which change the risks vs. rewards and systems that ask for you to change where your bets are on Hot/Cold numbers, and whatever, and that's fine. The former have a point to them, I just think some are very unadvisable to play while some are actually safer to play.
None of that changes the HOUSE EDGE while you're convinced you can have a POSITIVE EXPECTATION all I'm trying to explain is that no matter how your bets are placed, ordered, configured, sized, distriubuted, etc. none of that changes the HOUSE EDGE, since it is .0526/5.26% or .0263/ 2.63% on EVERY BET PLACED (with the exception of En Prison rules) on a roulette wheel. All that means is that for every bet is paid AS IF THERE WERE 36 numbers and there are 38, or 37 on a Eurpean table, so rather than having a similar amount won to lost THE HOUSE GETS A LITTLE MORE THAN THE PLAYERS, ON AVERAGE. That means over a few days - many people come and go, some win some lose, some use systems, some don't. In the end, the house ends up with AROUND 5.26% of all wagered bets, unless some High Roller comes in and skews that data.
I'm NOT SAYING SOMEBODY CAN'T WIN USING A SYSTEM. I'm saying that the system is either designed to make winning more likely, at a bigger risk, or winning overall less likely with less risk, or some mixture of the two. Or anything else they can imagine. There's never been a system found to dent the HOUSE EDGE. Or at least that's what the casinos say, and they've been doing pretty well.
Merriam-Webster: A logical operator that retur