United States
Member #116,263
September 7, 2011
20,243 Posts
Offline
with RL. And don't forget about the dangers of driving your car down the street..... I suppose Jammy would think its a"waste of time" making attempts to drive safely because after all, the "odds" of crashing are quite high so crashing is just a matter of random chance and there's nothing you can change about that?
United States
Member #116,263
September 7, 2011
20,243 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Jun 26, 2013
RL-RANDOMLOGIC says, "I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider they are not."
I know you've read my discussions of this in the past, but I guess you want me to repeat myself. In the lottery, the DISTRIBUTION of your winnings are a product of the way you choose to DISTRIBUTE your capital as bets. If you play a game long enough, your OVERALL winnings will be the same no matter how you choose to play.
...and, "Do you really read all the books that you link to."
Mostly, yes. If I haven't read a book I link to, I've read excerpts and/or reviews by people I respect. If you did due diligence before investing untold hours on problems that have either been previously solved OR PROVEN TO HAVE NO SOLUTION, you might avoid "reinventing the wheel," or wasting your time. I have always tried to avoid doing this, which is why I read books. You really should try it some day. If Epstein and Taleb are beyond your comprehension, there are introductory texts available.
Ronnie316 says, "Jammy does not need to read a book to know that he agrees with it, and it is therefore authoritative."
...which doesn't deserve a reply.
And WIN D attempts to dismiss Nicholas Taleb, a successful mathematical trader, by referring to him as a "bookie."
If you people knew how pathetic you appear when you conduct yourselves in this way when faced with evidence you cannot refute, you would be embarrassed, and quiet.
But you obviously don't know.
--Jimmy4164
Ronnie316 says, "Jammy does not need to read a book to know that he agrees with it, and it is therefore authoritative."
United States
Member #116,263
September 7, 2011
20,243 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Jun 26, 2013
RL-RANDOMLOGIC says, "I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider they are not."
I know you've read my discussions of this in the past, but I guess you want me to repeat myself. In the lottery, the DISTRIBUTION of your winnings are a product of the way you choose to DISTRIBUTE your capital as bets. If you play a game long enough, your OVERALL winnings will be the same no matter how you choose to play.
...and, "Do you really read all the books that you link to."
Mostly, yes. If I haven't read a book I link to, I've read excerpts and/or reviews by people I respect. If you did due diligence before investing untold hours on problems that have either been previously solved OR PROVEN TO HAVE NO SOLUTION, you might avoid "reinventing the wheel," or wasting your time. I have always tried to avoid doing this, which is why I read books. You really should try it some day. If Epstein and Taleb are beyond your comprehension, there are introductory texts available.
Ronnie316 says, "Jammy does not need to read a book to know that he agrees with it, and it is therefore authoritative."
...which doesn't deserve a reply.
And WIN D attempts to dismiss Nicholas Taleb, a successful mathematical trader, by referring to him as a "bookie."
If you people knew how pathetic you appear when you conduct yourselves in this way when faced with evidence you cannot refute, you would be embarrassed, and quiet.
But you obviously don't know.
--Jimmy4164
If I haven't read a book I link to, I've read excerpts and/or reviews by people I respect.
Like I said, Jammy does feel the need to read the books, as long as they have the socialist stamp of approval.
United States
Member #93,943
July 10, 2010
2,180 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Jun 26, 2013
RL-RANDOMLOGIC says, "I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider they are not."
I know you've read my discussions of this in the past, but I guess you want me to repeat myself. In the lottery, the DISTRIBUTION of your winnings are a product of the way you choose to DISTRIBUTE your capital as bets. If you play a game long enough, your OVERALL winnings will be the same no matter how you choose to play.
...and, "Do you really read all the books that you link to."
Mostly, yes. If I haven't read a book I link to, I've read excerpts and/or reviews by people I respect. If you did due diligence before investing untold hours on problems that have either been previously solved OR PROVEN TO HAVE NO SOLUTION, you might avoid "reinventing the wheel," or wasting your time. I have always tried to avoid doing this, which is why I read books. You really should try it some day. If Epstein and Taleb are beyond your comprehension, there are introductory texts available.
Ronnie316 says, "Jammy does not need to read a book to know that he agrees with it, and it is therefore authoritative."
...which doesn't deserve a reply.
And WIN D attempts to dismiss Nicholas Taleb, a successful mathematical trader, by referring to him as a "bookie."
If you people knew how pathetic you appear when you conduct yourselves in this way when faced with evidence you cannot refute, you would be embarrassed, and quiet.
But you obviously don't know.
--Jimmy4164
As I said earlier,
"If you people knew how pathetic you appear when you conduct yourselves in this way when faced with evidence you cannot refute, you would be embarrassed, and quiet.
"But you obviously don't know."
--Jimmy4164
P.S. RL: Check with BobP (Lotto-Logix) regarding your Pick-3 software.
United States
Member #116,263
September 7, 2011
20,243 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Jun 27, 2013
As I said earlier,
"If you people knew how pathetic you appear when you conduct yourselves in this way when faced with evidence you cannot refute, you would be embarrassed, and quiet.
"But you obviously don't know."
--Jimmy4164
P.S. RL: Check with BobP (Lotto-Logix) regarding your Pick-3 software.
You just replied to yourself Jammy. Are you off your meds? What do you do on Halloween night?
United States
Member #116,263
September 7, 2011
20,243 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Jun 27, 2013
As I said earlier,
"If you people knew how pathetic you appear when you conduct yourselves in this way when faced with evidence you cannot refute, you would be embarrassed, and quiet.
"But you obviously don't know."
--Jimmy4164
P.S. RL: Check with BobP (Lotto-Logix) regarding your Pick-3 software.
What does an embarrassed and quite person do in their free time Jammy?
United States
Member #116,263
September 7, 2011
20,243 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Jun 27, 2013
As I said earlier,
"If you people knew how pathetic you appear when you conduct yourselves in this way when faced with evidence you cannot refute, you would be embarrassed, and quiet.
"But you obviously don't know."
--Jimmy4164
P.S. RL: Check with BobP (Lotto-Logix) regarding your Pick-3 software.
I'm unrefuted everything you ever said, so there's no longer a need for me to be embarrassed and quite.