Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 11, 2016, 5:30 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Lottery Code has already been broken

Topic closed. 500 replies. Last post 3 years ago by superstar$.

Page 23 of 34
3.811
PrintE-mailLink

United States
Member #138440
January 27, 2013
44 Posts
Offline
Posted: June 8, 2013, 8:05 pm - IP Logged

"Multiple "short term windfall" sound just plain awesome to me."

Betting $18.75 (75 Quarter boxes) to win $18.75 isn't exactly my idea of a windfall either. For the same amount Larry Hughes will win $87,600.

 Actually, the number of combos differs all the time. The 75 I listed was just for that draw and is the upper limit. But, I don't expect you ,or anyone, to be blown away by the wind with this aspect. This is not appealing for jackpot seekers. I've never claimed that my system is ideal. In fact, it's not.

 However, it really does work and is better than what most people do. It's the ONLY TRUE answer to the game. It's just that it's not ideal. That's the catch. You can take it or leave it.

    Avatar
    Toronto
    Canada
    Member #138397
    January 26, 2013
    179 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: June 8, 2013, 8:06 pm - IP Logged

    You're welcome Kola.

    In this world, there are certain people that thrive on conflict, who affirm themselves through the denigration of others.

    You on the other hand, truly do unto others as you would have them do unto you.(even when they do terribly unto you)

    While I may disagree with you in substance, I do appreciate the spirit of your argument.

    Be well, and best of luck to you.

    So true. Like you, who for some reason keep using ad hominem against me, attacking me for no reason at all when I've done nothing to you. What's wrong with you?

     

    I wonder how your eyes are grown. Your ability to selectively read amazes me. It doesn't take a genius to realize that I've not been any more rude than they have to me. Just look at onlymoney's posts against me. Why do you not say anything about them? What's your problem?

      duckman's avatar - ducklogodrake64x64
      Jacksonville Florida
      United States
      Member #23018
      October 6, 2005
      918 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: June 8, 2013, 8:12 pm - IP Logged

      What language do you code in?  I coded in GW-Basic for years and since my desk top has Windows XP, I can still use those programs but my lap top uses Windows 7 and my next desk top or AIO computer will have Windows 8 or 8.1 so I'm going to have to learn a Basic that will run in the newer operating systems. 

      I'm looking at JustBasic, KBasic and ThinBasic, they all offer free stuff to make learning their version of Basic easy and cheap.

      GW-Basic ... now that goes back a few years!

      Brings back memories of Z-Basic on the old Apple II computers...

      Smiley


        United States
        Member #138440
        January 27, 2013
        44 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: June 8, 2013, 8:15 pm - IP Logged

        What language do you code in?  I coded in GW-Basic for years and since my desk top has Windows XP, I can still use those programs but my lap top uses Windows 7 and my next desk top or AIO computer will have Windows 8 or 8.1 so I'm going to have to learn a Basic that will run in the newer operating systems. 

        I'm looking at JustBasic, KBasic and ThinBasic, they all offer free stuff to make learning their version of Basic easy and cheap.

         That's a good question. When I speak of coding I don't mean that kind of coding. In other words, it's not programming code I speak of.

         However, I am a computer programmer. The languages I code in are javascript ,DHTML, Php and Mysql. I've also done Ajax. I've written very sophisticated lottery programs using php. All of the ones I've written are now obsolete. But, I'm interested in writing one up with this system in mind for others to use.

          helpmewin's avatar - dandy
          u$a
          United States
          Member #106665
          February 22, 2011
          19911 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: June 8, 2013, 8:28 pm - IP Logged

           The systems' coding ,and everything else, will be ,publicly, made available in my book one day. This is the only TRUE code to the game that exists. I've been told by everyone I know to keep it to myself. But, that goes against my nature. Once I'm gone it will be gone forever. No one else will ever rediscover it. I don't want this to happen.

           Yes, I don't play on every draw. I only play when the time is right. I do target-playing. It's important to know a good play from a bad one. The coding and patterns give me this upperhand.

          Well, I'm not interested in touring or anything. But, it's not necessary to go anywhere to play other states. One could just do that online.  I'm on here to help stir people in the right direction. I'm also in the midst of writing a book on the subject. If you're wondering, I'm not on here to sell anything either.

           

          so your really here to sell a book LOL

            Avatar
            Toronto
            Canada
            Member #138397
            January 26, 2013
            179 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: June 8, 2013, 8:29 pm - IP Logged

            Yoho,

            You said, 'I'm not saying that the energy wasn't concentrated "at the beginning". I'm saying after the big bang happened, it isn't "all is one" anymore'. It became many". When you begin with one point of energy or a A Field of Energy, and that energy differentiates into the "many" in the form of matter, heat, electromagnetism, gravity, strong and weak forces, and etc..,  its still all one field of energy. The science confirms that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but can be transformed. This is the well-known Law of the Conservation of Energy. This means that the total energy in a system stays the same. Its constant. Its still all just One Field of Energy.

            You also said, 'I have no idea how you came to the conclusion that E= MC squared implies that all energy is "one", whatever your "one" is'.  I merely put it there to gently highlight and remind you that with the speed of light being constant all the differentiated mass in the universe no matter what form it takes is really just one field of energy, and in the aggregate the quantity of this energy remains forever constant(although I do have a few alternative and slightly nuanced ideas about this, we'll stick with the mainstream and universally accepted theory as is) . Whether you say, country, people, organs, atoms, its all part of one field of energy. This field remains intact no matter the distance. And while  it is true, as you say, that most people in a country would not even know if someone died, we would have to qualify that and say we would not consciously know.

            You ask, what is this "One" I keep mentioning. In short and reductionist fashion, lets just say its the total amount of energy in the universe. It was present at .01 seconds before the Big Bang, and it has remained constant even after the Big Bang. .

            Lastly, with regard to your final comments, I don't think I implied that you don't have the capacity to understand physics. I'd like you to show me where you felt I might have. You routinely echoed your own personal sentiments about your lack of a physics background, and frankly, I don't really care whether you have a physics background or not. We are just sharing ideas and communicating in the best and simple ways we know how on a Lottery Forum. At least that's my intention. If you notice, I didn't talk about my educational background. For the moment, I consider it irrelevant.   If you're not just trying to stir things up in a negative way, and really feel that I implied that you can't understand physics, then I'm sincerely sorry.  You then say, 'But please, don't try to pass off your writing as "science". Unless you really think it's science, then why don't you publish it?'. Again, I don't know what you're honest intention is with these particular comments, but it doesn't smell good, so I'll just take my leave. Be well yoho, and thanks for the dialogue.

            Kola

            I'll tell you what my honest intentions are. At first, I tried to be polite and just disagree with your statements, but you seem to keep pushing them, implying that I am somehow denying the truth despite something "deep inside me resonating with your truths" (quote modified slightly).

             

            I keep stressing that I don't know enough about physics for the benefit of certain people, who seem to feel that if I don't say so, that I am superior to everyone else. I have no idea why they feel such a way, but being the nice person that I am, I try to bring conflicts to a minimum. That said, I am an imperfect person, and I do get angry and end up saying things that are not so nice, when they are so unreasonable.

             

            Now, what is my intention? I admit you are a good writer. But you simply can't try to use some scientific facts and then extrapolate however you like. It seems to me like the reason you use physics is to make your ideas seem like they're somehow scientific, but they're most certainly not. If I misunderstood your intentions, I apologize. But the fact remains, that just because you use some scientific facts in your arguments, does not make the whole argument and your extrapolations science.

             

            I personally feel that because of your writing skills, you write in such a way that is really misleading. The use of "one" was one example. There are many others, but I am not intelligent enough to accurately point them all out, one by one.

             

            Basically, your theory is unfalsifiable. It's like saying there's an invisible, undetectable unicorn in my pocket. You can't prove that it doesn't exist, since it is, by definition undetectable.

             

            In such cases, you need to support your argument with hard data, proofs, calculations or any other supporting evidence. You can't just say it might be this way, so you're right.

             

            Let's see if I understood this correctly: Let's push away all that useless stuff and "One energy" and whatever. That doesn't have anything to do with your actual purpose and argument, which is this statement:

            It is possible to predict lottery numbers based on past results.

            Am I correct? I mean I understand you said all that to support your argument, but in the end, everything you said can be summed up thus, right?

             

            And when I mentioned the wisp of wind in another galaxy, your response means something like this:

            Even if the wisp of wind affects the lottery numbers, we don't need to know how it affects it. Because if you take all past, present and future draws, and look for  the pattern there, the affect of that wind is already included.

             

            Did I understand that correctly? If so, I disagree with this statement. To see a pattern in something, you MUST know all the variables. If there's even one unknown variable, you won't be able to see the pattern in the first place.

             

            I understand that you don't want to share your research and methods you mentioned for pick 3. Because it seems like you got some positive results. That's perfectly understandable and reasonable. I'm not going to ask you for your system and methods. I'm just going to trust you to answer honestly on this one question:

            Taking the past results (let's say from 2000-2010) of any pick 3 game, how often can you guess correctly the numbers from 2011-2013? Is it really a higher probability than a purely random method?

              helpmewin's avatar - dandy
              u$a
              United States
              Member #106665
              February 22, 2011
              19911 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: June 8, 2013, 8:42 pm - IP Logged

              "Multiple "short term windfall" sound just plain awesome to me."

              Betting $18.75 (75 Quarter boxes) to win $18.75 isn't exactly my idea of a windfall either. For the same amount Larry Hughes will win $87,600.

              BananaI Agree! 

              Box hit for $18.75 that's what i call Mastering the p3

              BananaBananaBananaBananaBananaBananaBanana


                United States
                Member #138440
                January 27, 2013
                44 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: June 8, 2013, 8:48 pm - IP Logged

                BananaI Agree! 

                Box hit for $18.75 that's what i call Mastering the p3

                BananaBananaBananaBananaBananaBananaBanana

                 You're very narrow-minded. Honestly, how are you doing with your game? I'm making money. What about you?


                  United States
                  Member #138440
                  January 27, 2013
                  44 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: June 8, 2013, 8:49 pm - IP Logged

                  Well, I'm not interested in touring or anything. But, it's not necessary to go anywhere to play other states. One could just do that online.  I'm on here to help stir people in the right direction. I'm also in the midst of writing a book on the subject. If you're wondering, I'm not on here to sell anything either.

                   

                  so your really here to sell a book LOL

                   Are you at it again? You highlighted it yourself. Why don't you look at the last sentence. NO!!


                    United States
                    Member #116268
                    September 7, 2011
                    20244 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: June 8, 2013, 8:52 pm - IP Logged

                     You're very narrow-minded. Honestly, how are you doing with your game? I'm making money. What about you?

                    Is the $18.75 the only thing you have ever won? Can you post some photos of winning tickets?


                      United States
                      Member #116268
                      September 7, 2011
                      20244 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: June 8, 2013, 8:55 pm - IP Logged

                      This is my last big winner for $7.

                        helpmewin's avatar - dandy
                        u$a
                        United States
                        Member #106665
                        February 22, 2011
                        19911 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: June 8, 2013, 9:05 pm - IP Logged

                         Are you at it again? You highlighted it yourself. Why don't you look at the last sentence. NO!!

                        The systems' coding ,and everything else, will be ,publicly, made available in my book one day. This is the only TRUE code to the game that exists. I've been told by everyone I know to keep it to myself. But, that goes against my nature. Once I'm gone it will be gone forever. No one else will ever rediscover it. I don't want this to happen.

                         

                        then what you ganna do give the book away for FREE

                          helpmewin's avatar - dandy
                          u$a
                          United States
                          Member #106665
                          February 22, 2011
                          19911 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: June 8, 2013, 9:06 pm - IP Logged

                          Is the $18.75 the only thing you have ever won? Can you post some photos of winning tickets?

                          MAYBE  2 GALLON OF GASGreen laugh

                            helpmewin's avatar - dandy
                            u$a
                            United States
                            Member #106665
                            February 22, 2011
                            19911 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: June 8, 2013, 9:08 pm - IP Logged

                             You're very narrow-minded. Honestly, how are you doing with your game? I'm making money. What about you?

                            Crying


                              United States
                              Member #116268
                              September 7, 2011
                              20244 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: June 8, 2013, 9:11 pm - IP Logged

                               You're very narrow-minded. Honestly, how are you doing with your game? I'm making money. What about you?

                              Making money with .25 tickets means you must have LOTS of winners that you could show without giving away your system. Do you save all the losers and winners for taxes?

                                 
                                Page 23 of 34