Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 3, 2016, 10:50 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

RL's T-Lex program download, free software

Topic closed. 1459 replies. Last post 7 months ago by frenchie.

Page 87 of 98
4.922
PrintE-mailLink
lottoburg's avatar - wiggle
NYC
United States
Member #54483
August 20, 2007
886 Posts
Offline
Posted: February 3, 2016, 1:55 am - IP Logged

I see and thanks a lots!

In addition, I can not delete any line from the data file of NY5390

since these files in T-lex can be read only but written.

How can I do that next?

Best regards,

lb

Hi, RL:

Following your suggestion:"I suggest opening the game database using notepad

and deleting all but around 1000 to 1500 lines. "

I have deleted the all lines from 1992-2002 in my NY5390.

Now the function is working for me.

Also, I don't think the deleting will effect the prediction comparing the full data by using T-Lex.

I'm so sorry for the carelessness and confusion.

Best regards,

lb

  • Saying Lotto #s Can be Predicted means that Lotto's ODD can be reduced down  to an economical level by a system.
  • Saying a Lotto System Works means that we can win constantly (not each draw)  and economically (get a real profit) by using the System.
  • Practice is the only criterion for testing truth.
    Avatar
    Krakow
    Poland
    Member #86302
    February 2, 2010
    859 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: February 3, 2016, 3:45 am - IP Logged

    RL,

    Thanks for your clear and detail explanations!

    Could you let us know further how can you confirm your SC prediction by using the Steps Tool

    or Game Mode? Please keep to using the same example and picture above for your confirmation.

    Appreciate greatly your smart analysis and nice sharing!

    Best regards,

    lb

    lottoburg

    You got it all. You can use Steps or c/s charts or both, I think now it's absolutely clear how to do it after RL's explanations. Just practice, that's what you need to improve your selections.

    Adam

      Avatar
      Krakow
      Poland
      Member #86302
      February 2, 2010
      859 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: February 3, 2016, 3:52 am - IP Logged

      For last night's draw I used the following setup. So 1 choice incorrect and it's a pity as $ 1.7 million was at stake.

      Mark my words- choose 1 game only and stick to it, no matter what.

      Adam

      lexie2lexie1

        Avatar
        Krakow
        Poland
        Member #86302
        February 2, 2010
        859 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: February 3, 2016, 10:02 am - IP Logged

        Guys,

        One more thing I'd like to add. Do not think that there's one magic formula that will work with all the games in the same way. You remember what RL wrote that he finds significant differences between P-3 and P-4 using the same method and the game which has better odds for a player turns out for him more difficult to hit. It can be the same with you. Pick a game and try to work out your best method to deal with it, be it s/c cart steps or whatever. Once you've chosen it stick to it and do not get distracted by other games. Learning one game is hard enough while learning 2 different and playing both borders on impossible and inevitably leads to winning none of them.

        Adam

          lottoburg's avatar - wiggle
          NYC
          United States
          Member #54483
          August 20, 2007
          886 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: February 4, 2016, 12:29 am - IP Logged

          lottoburg

          You got it all. You can use Steps or c/s charts or both, I think now it's absolutely clear how to do it after RL's explanations. Just practice, that's what you need to improve your selections.

          Adam

          Adam,

          You're right! Thumbs Up

          I'm working for my backtests following RL's and your smart strategies now.

          I believe firmly that we can win the lottery by using T-LEX in the future. Cheers

          Thanks for your sincere help and nice sharing again!!!

          Best regards,

          lb

          • Saying Lotto #s Can be Predicted means that Lotto's ODD can be reduced down  to an economical level by a system.
          • Saying a Lotto System Works means that we can win constantly (not each draw)  and economically (get a real profit) by using the System.
          • Practice is the only criterion for testing truth.
            lottoburg's avatar - wiggle
            NYC
            United States
            Member #54483
            August 20, 2007
            886 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: February 4, 2016, 12:45 am - IP Logged

            Here are the links for the newest version of T-lex that includes the new SC-tool option.

            I advise to watch the video as some basic stuff has changed.  I tried to keep the video

            short but I think it still ended up around 77mb zipped.  I removed the previous patch

            links to prevent people from running the old patch file on the new version.  This is a

            full install so uninstall the old version first.  Failure to do this will cause errors as I made

            changes to the file structure.  I think with this addition T-lex has reached maturity and

            nothing else is needed.  The databases have been updated to 01-27-16 so  you may

            need to update a few games.  Please report any bugs you may find.  I think it's working

            100% but there are just too many things for me to test.   If bugs are found I will fix them

            and create a update/patch at a later date.  Any old patch files should not be applied to this

            version.

            RL

             

            Changes / instructions video.  I Strongly recommend you watch it.

            https://app.box.com/s/tpy4u5bhgl8nidsquiwxycyuwymd8t8h

             

            Full install link  T-lex

            https://app.box.com/s/qv3nx5noj0bod1z7y770ypeohkzjvnwc

            Hi, RL:

            I find another problem for the new version of T-lex.

            I'm not sure why I can not zoom in the pictures by changing the settings in my PC. 

            Only the top words such as RL's Tyrannosaurus Lex, S/C Tools, ... have been 

            magnified but the pictures are not working.

            I remember that I can do the same thing for the previous version of T-LEX.

            The previous version is working very well for my adjustment.

            Could you let me know how can I do that for the new version?

            Thanks a lots.

            Best regards,

            lb

            • Saying Lotto #s Can be Predicted means that Lotto's ODD can be reduced down  to an economical level by a system.
            • Saying a Lotto System Works means that we can win constantly (not each draw)  and economically (get a real profit) by using the System.
            • Practice is the only criterion for testing truth.
              RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

              United States
              Member #59354
              March 13, 2008
              3962 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: February 4, 2016, 6:01 am - IP Logged

              T-Lex has a footprint of 1060 X 686.  Set your computers screen resolution to anything larger.

              RL

              Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

              I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

              they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

              USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

                US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

                frenchie's avatar - Lottery-041.jpg
                Los Angeles
                United States
                Member #75410
                June 2, 2009
                479 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: February 4, 2016, 1:07 pm - IP Logged

                For last night's draw I used the following setup. So 1 choice incorrect and it's a pity as $ 1.7 million was at stake.

                Mark my words- choose 1 game only and stick to it, no matter what.

                Adam

                lexie2lexie1

                Adam,

                You always gone surprise me, your selections are so close I'm not worry about you, you'll be a Millionaire very soon.

                Frenchie.

                  RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

                  United States
                  Member #59354
                  March 13, 2008
                  3962 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: February 4, 2016, 2:48 pm - IP Logged

                  Hi all

                  I will be uploading a patch for the steps tool in the next day or so.  The version I included was not the one

                  I intended to add to T-lex.  The current version recalculates each step depending on the previous step.  This

                  cuts down on the amount of data that can be analyzed.  The new version uses all the data regardless of 

                  which is value is set in the previous step.

                  RL

                  Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

                  I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

                  they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

                  USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

                    US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

                    Avatar
                    Krakow
                    Poland
                    Member #86302
                    February 2, 2010
                    859 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: February 5, 2016, 3:17 am - IP Logged

                    Craig

                    I wonder how it will affect choices in steps 2 and 3.

                    Adam

                      Avatar
                      Krakow
                      Poland
                      Member #86302
                      February 2, 2010
                      859 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: February 5, 2016, 4:57 am - IP Logged

                      Adam,

                      You always gone surprise me, your selections are so close I'm not worry about you, you'll be a Millionaire very soon.

                      frenchie

                      There are lots of draws when I miss correct values. The point is I'm doing my best not to get discouraged by those failures and keep on at it. From the moment RL offered his software, I've always stuck to it no matter what. I never jumped from one software to another or tried to use a handful of them at the same time. Patience is the  key. I do not know how many of those who downloaded it really put some effort into learning how it works. I think very few. Most people do not have the patience to stick to it or use it alongside many other tools from various sources. You cannot expect good results jumping here and there every now and then. Add to it the fact that there is no direct and magic formula to get there and you got the picture.

                      Adam

                        Avatar
                        Horwood NL
                        Canada
                        Member #70613
                        February 6, 2009
                        296 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: February 5, 2016, 8:40 am - IP Logged

                        frenchie

                        There are lots of draws when I miss correct values. The point is I'm doing my best not to get discouraged by those failures and keep on at it. From the moment RL offered his software, I've always stuck to it no matter what. I never jumped from one software to another or tried to use a handful of them at the same time. Patience is the  key. I do not know how many of those who downloaded it really put some effort into learning how it works. I think very few. Most people do not have the patience to stick to it or use it alongside many other tools from various sources. You cannot expect good results jumping here and there every now and then. Add to it the fact that there is no direct and magic formula to get there and you got the picture.

                        Adam

                        RL , Adam

                        I too have used RL's software since it was first offered . Most times I manage to get 3 of 6 but to many lines to play . I have had as high as 10 lines with 5 of 6 but with a little over 1000 lines to play . I'm having a hard time reducing the 1000 lines without loosing any of the 5 of 6 . One question I have is there one of the lexie numbers (in 649 8 of them) that effects a particular draw number or does changing any one of them effect all the numbers in the draw ?

                        I use RL's method from his video . I copy and paste the s/c chart to notepad++ , using search I find and mark all the c's then print it out . I all so print out a copy of the colour chart produced from F10 as a reference .

                        Thanks RL for the great software and help you are willing to give to us that are not so skillful at programming as you are .

                        GW

                          Avatar
                          Krakow
                          Poland
                          Member #86302
                          February 2, 2010
                          859 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: February 5, 2016, 8:49 am - IP Logged

                          RL , Adam

                          I too have used RL's software since it was first offered . Most times I manage to get 3 of 6 but to many lines to play . I have had as high as 10 lines with 5 of 6 but with a little over 1000 lines to play . I'm having a hard time reducing the 1000 lines without loosing any of the 5 of 6 . One question I have is there one of the lexie numbers (in 649 8 of them) that effects a particular draw number or does changing any one of them effect all the numbers in the draw ?

                          I use RL's method from his video . I copy and paste the s/c chart to notepad++ , using search I find and mark all the c's then print it out . I all so print out a copy of the colour chart produced from F10 as a reference .

                          Thanks RL for the great software and help you are willing to give to us that are not so skillful at programming as you are .

                          GW

                          Gwoof

                          I think you are doing pretty well. How do you reduce your 1000 lines? Pls post your typical setup, ok?

                          Changing any digit changes the numbers you will get. You can easily test it doing a couple of setups and looking at the numbers you are getting. The most dramatic changes are a result of setting the second lexie digit of your 6/49( assuming that you let the first one run wild). Even if all the remaining ones are correct you will most likely miss all the numbers in the draw. So utmost care must be taken when setting this position to one value only.

                          Hope it helps.

                          Adam

                            Avatar
                            Horwood NL
                            Canada
                            Member #70613
                            February 6, 2009
                            296 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: February 5, 2016, 9:17 am - IP Logged

                            Gwoof

                            I think you are doing pretty well. How do you reduce your 1000 lines? Pls post your typical setup, ok?

                            Changing any digit changes the numbers you will get. You can easily test it doing a couple of setups and looking at the numbers you are getting. The most dramatic changes are a result of setting the second lexie digit of your 6/49( assuming that you let the first one run wild). Even if all the remaining ones are correct you will most likely miss all the numbers in the draw. So utmost care must be taken when setting this position to one value only.

                            Hope it helps.

                            Adam

                            Adam

                             The c/s settings I used are

                                Lexie   

                                A        B           C         D         E         F           G         H

                             WWS    WWW      SCS    WWW    CCC     WWW      CCS     WWW

                            The next draw numbers for this game Atlantic 649 which are not in the history yet were  4 , 14 , 17 , 19 , 24 , 43 , B 12  when put into check gave me 10 lines of 5 of 6 plus several 4's and 3's .

                            It takes a while to produce the set using that many wilds . I'm still trying to reduce the number of lines without loosing the 5 of 6 . I don't know if those settings will give you the same results with the game you are playing .

                             GW

                              Avatar
                              Krakow
                              Poland
                              Member #86302
                              February 2, 2010
                              859 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: February 5, 2016, 9:25 am - IP Logged

                              Adam

                               The c/s settings I used are

                                  Lexie   

                                  A        B           C         D         E         F           G         H

                               WWS    WWW      SCS    WWW    CCC     WWW      CCS     WWW

                              The next draw numbers for this game Atlantic 649 which are not in the history yet were  4 , 14 , 17 , 19 , 24 , 43 , B 12  when put into check gave me 10 lines of 5 of 6 plus several 4's and 3's .

                              It takes a while to produce the set using that many wilds . I'm still trying to reduce the number of lines without loosing the 5 of 6 . I don't know if those settings will give you the same results with the game you are playing .

                               GW

                              Ok, so you base your setups on s/c chart. I'm not very good at it so I think that RL would guide you much better here.

                              However what seems obvious is that you would at least have to fill in all the wilds in positions 2 and 3 to have a chance of getting a smaller number of sets. It is always a gamble so do not expect to be right all the time. I play the same game as you do so there's not much difference here.

                              Adam

                                 
                                Page 87 of 98