Quick Links   You last visited May 16, 2022, 4:51 pm All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00) | Math Geniuses, Help!! "SLAG" Odd/Even Analysis - Chart I
United States Member #173010 February 13, 2016 1407 Posts Offline | That's a good idea as well.
For me, I know I'm never going to play certain combinations, so I refuse to bother with them. Five consecutive, five of the same back digit. That's one of those extremely rare happening that just materialize out of nowhere and Poof! They're gone!
Four of the same digits has happened once between Powerball and Mega Millions since 2017.
Strange thing, I was looking for an unmatched game last draw (all different back digits) and a triple showed. 15 26 28 35 45
Things like that do happen. Here's what I was looking at...... Charts a little screwy when it posted so when you see the last two digits 13, 14, 15, 34, those are the positions where the pair fell. 34 points to the 17,27 pair in the 3 and 4 position in the first draw. 15 points to the 9 in the first and last position......14 is first and fourth position and so forth.
| 393 | 1 | 9 | 17 | 27 | 34 | 7 | 20 | 34 | | 394 | 9 | 18 | 40 | 46 | 69 | 9 | 25 | 15 | | 395 | 29 | 45 | 50 | 59 | 62 | 9 | 20 | 14 | | 396 | 17 | 21 | 35 | 40 | 53 | 107 | 12345 | | 397 | 3 | 6 | 16 | 38 | 56 | 6 | 2 | 235 | | 398 | 41 | 43 | 51 | 57 | 70 | 1 | 32 | 13 | | 399 | 17 | 18 | 26 | 52 | 67 | 7 | 26 | 15 | | 400 | 1 | 10 | 44 | 47 | 56 | 108 | 12345 | | 401 | 8 | 14 | 31 | 58 | 68 | 8 | 2 | 145 | | 402 | 7 | 10 | 12 | 61 | 65 | 109 | 12345 | | 403 | 15 | 17 | 25 | 32 | 53 | 5 | 33 | 13 | | 404 | 20 | 32 | 35 | 47 | 64 | 110 | 12345 | | 405 | 4 | 13 | 19 | 63 | 64 | 4 | 15-23 | | 406 | 17 | 32 | 40 | 59 | 61 | 111 | 12345 | | 407 | 36 | 41 | 45 | 51 | 56 | 5 | 15-23 | | 408 | 17 | 21 | 27 | 43 | 56 | 7 | 34 | 13 | | 409 | 18 | 30 | 43 | 68 | 69 | 8 | 21 | 14 | | 410 | 21 | 25 | 36 | 62 | 63 | 112 | 12345 | | 411 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 30 | 36 | 113 | 12345 | | 412 | 21 | 24 | 36 | 40 | 70 | 0 | 20 | 45 | | 413 | 21 | 26 | 56 | 61 | 65 | 4 | 14-23 | | 414 | 3 | 20 | 31 | 34 | 65 | 114 | 12345 | | 415 | 3 | 12 | 13 | 19 | 52 | 4 | 13-25 | | 416 | 9 | 14 | 26 | 28 | 66 | 6 | 31 | 35 | | 417 | 6 | 14 | 19 | 56 | 62 | 6 | 22 | 14 | | 418 | 15 | 26 | 28 | 35 | 45 | 5 | 145 |
Trend said when you have a double or two doubles it would be broken by 5 unmatched back digits.
In draw 418 that did not happen. We got a triple. A FREAKING TRIPLE!
Same thing in second position. You have 6 evens, I expected an odd. Didn't happen.
I did go heavy on the 30's and 40s since they had been missing 3 and 5 draws. I chose three each.
None of mine hit. (33,38,37 and 42,47,48)
There's enough to trip you up without adding to the mix (IMO).
I'm learning/relearning a lot of the basics from the book that have been glossed over and repeated on the gossip line so long they have totally different meanings now. And its not easy unlearning things that you want to believe and things you've told yourself are true for so many years.
I actually question things she writes. Then I do the math and look at from what she's saying and it makes sense even if it doesn't agree with what I thought.
But I don't think there is a right and wrong way, as long as you're consistent in what you do. Still, I'm relying on her to make sense of everything. Makes it much easier on my old brain!
G Nice to see this analysis. Took some time for me to go over each one of them. MM has beautiful symmetry with no balance off... H/L;E/O;group splits,etc., Mega Millions : Main balls : 5/70 consecutive sets analysis:
01-02-03-04-05
02-03-04-05-06
03-04-05-06-07
------
64-65-66-67-68
65-66-67-68-69
66-67-68-69-70 66 combinations removal from 12,607,306 = 0.00052350597% removal.
Last digits appearance count 0-9 digits possible count 0-5: this was grabbed by running 12M+ full sets :
DIGITS SAME COUNT WB LAST DIGITS
DIGIT 0
COUNT : 0 IN COMBINATIONS : 7028847
COUNT : 1 IN COMBINATIONS : 4169655
COUNT : 2 IN COMBINATIONS : 833931
COUNT : 3 IN COMBINATIONS : 68355
COUNT : 4 IN COMBINATIONS : 2205
COUNT : 5 IN COMBINATIONS : 21
DIGIT 1
COUNT : 0 IN COMBINATIONS : 7028847
COUNT : 1 IN COMBINATIONS : 4169655
COUNT : 2 IN COMBINATIONS : 833931
COUNT : 3 IN COMBINATIONS : 68355
COUNT : 4 IN COMBINATIONS : 2205
COUNT : 5 IN COMBINATIONS : 21
DIGIT 2
COUNT : 0 IN COMBINATIONS : 7028847
COUNT : 1 IN COMBINATIONS : 4169655
COUNT : 2 IN COMBINATIONS : 833931
COUNT : 3 IN COMBINATIONS : 68355
COUNT : 4 IN COMBINATIONS : 2205
COUNT : 5 IN COMBINATIONS : 21
DIGIT 3
COUNT : 0 IN COMBINATIONS : 7028847
COUNT : 1 IN COMBINATIONS : 4169655
COUNT : 2 IN COMBINATIONS : 833931
COUNT : 3 IN COMBINATIONS : 68355
COUNT : 4 IN COMBINATIONS : 2205
COUNT : 5 IN COMBINATIONS : 21
DIGIT 4
COUNT : 0 IN COMBINATIONS : 7028847
COUNT : 1 IN COMBINATIONS : 4169655
COUNT : 2 IN COMBINATIONS : 833931
COUNT : 3 IN COMBINATIONS : 68355
COUNT : 4 IN COMBINATIONS : 2205
COUNT : 5 IN COMBINATIONS : 21
DIGIT 5
COUNT : 0 IN COMBINATIONS : 7028847
COUNT : 1 IN COMBINATIONS : 4169655
COUNT : 2 IN COMBINATIONS : 833931
COUNT : 3 IN COMBINATIONS : 68355
COUNT : 4 IN COMBINATIONS : 2205
COUNT : 5 IN COMBINATIONS : 21
DIGIT 6
COUNT : 0 IN COMBINATIONS : 7028847
COUNT : 1 IN COMBINATIONS : 4169655
COUNT : 2 IN COMBINATIONS : 833931
COUNT : 3 IN COMBINATIONS : 68355
COUNT : 4 IN COMBINATIONS : 2205
COUNT : 5 IN COMBINATIONS : 21
DIGIT 7
COUNT : 0 IN COMBINATIONS : 7028847
COUNT : 1 IN COMBINATIONS : 4169655
COUNT : 2 IN COMBINATIONS : 833931
COUNT : 3 IN COMBINATIONS : 68355
COUNT : 4 IN COMBINATIONS : 2205
COUNT : 5 IN COMBINATIONS : 21
DIGIT 8
COUNT : 0 IN COMBINATIONS : 7028847
COUNT : 1 IN COMBINATIONS : 4169655
COUNT : 2 IN COMBINATIONS : 833931
COUNT : 3 IN COMBINATIONS : 68355
COUNT : 4 IN COMBINATIONS : 2205
COUNT : 5 IN COMBINATIONS : 21
DIGIT 9
COUNT : 0 IN COMBINATIONS : 7028847
COUNT : 1 IN COMBINATIONS : 4169655
COUNT : 2 IN COMBINATIONS : 833931
COUNT : 3 IN COMBINATIONS : 68355
COUNT : 4 IN COMBINATIONS : 2205
COUNT : 5 IN COMBINATIONS : 21
same 5 last digits :
max wheel :
10,20,30,40,50,60,70
1,11,21,31,41,51,61
....
9,19,29,39,49,59,69
0-9 : 10 sets of 7 number wheels 7 choose 5. => 10*21 = 210 combinations removal from 12,607,306 = 0.00166570082% removal. Taking 4 main balls with same 4 digits + one main ball number with some other digit....
10 sets of 7 choose 4 *(70 all - 7 any with same digit already chosen) => 7C4 * 63 * 10 = 35*63 * 10 = 22050 sets. So had someone played these 22050 sets on all draws they could have grabbed one win => 22050 sets * 2 draws per week * 52 weeks * 4 yrs
22050 * 2 * 52 * 4 = 9172800$ to win 1,000,000$; post taxes still huge loss.
If it falls within the first year.
22050 * 2 * 52 * 1 = 2293200$ to win 1,000,000$; post taxes still huge loss.
If it falls within the first 6 months.
22050 * 2 * 26 * 1 = 1146600$ to win 1,000,000$; post taxes still huge loss.
If it falls within the first 2 months.
22050 * 2 * 4 * 1 = 176400$ to win 1,000,000$; post taxes huge win => 430k post taxes in Iowa 430k-176k = 254k profit;
so targeting few weeks to 2 months can get a big time pay(risky and even might not happen)
If there are multiple games to play in a state and if someone notices this hasn't happened in one of the large games, they can bet(possibly add some good filters) - pools can take this risk.
Note : I am not asking to chase it; Lesser the combinations We chase/lock and play, the chance to get 5/5 in every game is out and would resemble people waiting with luck numbers.
The day you track and catch that 3 matching last digits, if you were able to track and hold that for some time(keep that filter open include it for few days)
what happens is that, you end up dealing with :
10 sets of * 7 choose 3 * (70-7) choose 2 = 10* 7C3 * 63C2 = 10 * 35 * 1953 = 683,550 combination.
Beyond 3 same digits check, 2 numbers count can overlap(combinatorial counting and product will differ). So I am stopping with 3 and 4 same digits calculations.The combinations could go slightly lesser based on some numbers can't appear in few positions.
Gary, Don't miss that 5 unmatched last digit; It should be in line - hold that filter open for few drawings. It will come when you don't expect or stop playing it. Thanks & Good Luck | | |
Texas United States Member #4549 May 2, 2004 3132 Posts Online | Nice work!
I still have a lot to do to put everything together. Still have a lot of things to test too.
Right now trying to get into the Win7 drive with Excel, the files and most programs.
So far. No luck. But I'm not out of ideas (yet).
And its something to do while I'm taking a break.
Just have to see what happens.
G I'm probably here unless I'm not. | | |
Belgium Member #214858 April 17, 2021 2328 Posts Offline | I still wonder how you want to win with: The best you can do O/E patternwise is putting O and E correctly in each position.
Otherwise you are picking numbers directly. | | |
United States Member #173010 February 13, 2016 1407 Posts Offline | I still wonder how you want to win with: The best you can do O/E patternwise is putting O and E correctly in each position.
Otherwise you are picking numbers directly. Every position or few of the positions 1-5. Fixing correct filter per position helps reduce combinations. | | |
Thread Starter
Flat Earth United States Member #161360 November 27, 2014 721 Posts Online | I ended up with a huge html reply with too many html tags for table - that didn't go through and it crashed. Here are the images These are hit/skip, hit/skip skip sum tables for powerball 5/69 white balls with drawings till 10-13-2021 
The charts give a better view of what is happening(at least an eye pleasing view instead of console table views). These are something that I have been working on. I had the data for long time(few years). I am trying to make it usable to choose numbers on actual drawing day. Hope this will bring up more ideas/enhancements. Most of these are already existing criteria/choices used by lot of people. This is not just for the 5 white balls - any number characteristic or feature or digits or etc., can be plotted and used in a similar fashion. Good Luck Nice DSH and column graphs. I made a selection of 11 numbers off this chart a while back. This is how it looks. obviously this is old. 11 numbers in 9 lines will cost 18 dollars. Focus on 4 bonus numbers and play. The last results were 1 2 24 50 57. That I just looked up. I got the one. Off this chart I probably should have selected the 24 as adjacent. Too many choices. I dont know how long this pattern will hold. And now I did not check the other results, but I do know the 1 2 hit as I made my own DSH more recently in excel with some SL applications. Specifally the TGGC theory. That is for another day.
| | |
Thread Starter
Flat Earth United States Member #161360 November 27, 2014 721 Posts Online | I still wonder how you want to win with: The best you can do O/E patternwise is putting O and E correctly in each position.
Otherwise you are picking numbers directly. I am trying to get two low odds correct. So if I think odds are due, I play something like 5 7 9. Then I use a default gap of ten which will hopeful bring me to the high side. A gap of ten results in the next even number being an even number. If I play the same gap high then it is 20 22. Then I have to unfortunately wait. The more money you play and the bigger the wheel, the less science and more superstitition. Its called Smartastical Luckiness Patternwise Theoretics. The best you can do is try your best to analyze numbers scientifically. Otherwise you are picking numbers indirectly. | | |
Thread Starter
Flat Earth United States Member #161360 November 27, 2014 721 Posts Online | Mega Millions v % 2 pattern straight:
Scores: 5/5 to 0/5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 72 | 139 | 122 | 56 | 7 | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 63 | 137 | 123 | 62 | 15 | | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 66 | 119 | 118 | 80 | 17 | | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 80 | 118 | 119 | 66 | 18 | | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 51 | 125 | 135 | 75 | 15 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 63 | 120 | 143 | 64 | 11 | | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 75 | 142 | 117 | 59 | 9 | | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 78 | 137 | 133 | 48 | 6 | | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 75 | 135 | 125 | 51 | 17 | | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 64 | 133 | 123 | 69 | 14 | | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 62 | 139 | 130 | 63 | 9 | | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 68 | 147 | 119 | 55 | 14 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 62 | 123 | 137 | 63 | 18 | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 77 | 135 | 131 | 52 | 9 | | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 81 | 123 | 126 | 64 | 10 | | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 55 | 119 | 147 | 68 | 15 | | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 69 | 123 | 133 | 64 | 15 | | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 60 | 138 | 146 | 49 | 11 | | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 64 | 126 | 124 | 77 | 13 | | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 77 | 124 | 126 | 64 | 14 | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 64 | 143 | 120 | 63 | 17 | | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 49 | 146 | 138 | 60 | 14 | | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 66 | 140 | 131 | 67 | 4 | | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 64 | 126 | 123 | 81 | 14 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 77 | 144 | 115 | 63 | 9 | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 63 | 115 | 144 | 77 | 10 | | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 63 | 130 | 139 | 62 | 15 | | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 59 | 117 | 142 | 75 | 16 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 52 | 131 | 135 | 77 | 14 | | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 56 | 122 | 139 | 72 | 22 | | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 48 | 133 | 137 | 78 | 16 | | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 67 | 131 | 140 | 66 | 10 |
Maybe that helps? Boxed pattern: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 77 | 135 | 131 | 52 | 9 | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 77 | 149 | 131 | 52 | 9 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 135 | 208 | 66 | 9 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 131 | 187 | 86 | 14 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 52 | 140 | 135 | 77 | 14 | 0 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 52 | 131 | 135 | 77 | 14 |
Mega Millions v % 2 pattern straight:
Scores: 5/5 to 0/5 You dont define what Mega v % 2 pattern straight is. You lack knowlege. You need more studies in mathematics and probability. The courses suck and they hide the good stuff. I have better. A box only helps for a cat that has to go pee bad. | | |
United States Member #173010 February 13, 2016 1407 Posts Offline | Nice DSH and column graphs. I made a selection of 11 numbers off this chart a while back. This is how it looks. obviously this is old. 11 numbers in 9 lines will cost 18 dollars. Focus on 4 bonus numbers and play. The last results were 1 2 24 50 57. That I just looked up. I got the one. Off this chart I probably should have selected the 24 as adjacent. Too many choices. I dont know how long this pattern will hold. And now I did not check the other results, but I do know the 1 2 hit as I made my own DSH more recently in excel with some SL applications. Specifally the TGGC theory. That is for another day.
Thank you. I have to find ways to use trends and come up with my numbers to wheel. I have some charts and tables. TGGC- What is that? | | |
United States Member #173010 February 13, 2016 1407 Posts Offline | Mega Millions v % 2 pattern straight:
Scores: 5/5 to 0/5 You dont define what Mega v % 2 pattern straight is. You lack knowlege. You need more studies in mathematics and probability. The courses suck and they hide the good stuff. I have better. A box only helps for a cat that has to go pee bad. Jeet % is Mod. Modulus : e.g. 3 % 2= 1 The output is the remainder of division. N % 2 =0 is even and N % 2 = 1 is odd. He has listed all straight possibilities of even-odd as the remainder(modulus operation). 0 0 0 0 0 is 5 evens pattern 1 1 1 1 1 is 5 odds pattern He shows positional occurrence but without headers, can't be sure. This is same as EEEEE and OOOOO difference is numbers vs alphabets. This mod style tracking fits better when we try beyond even odd and choose to track modulus of 3,4,5,6... to 9 or so. It's another way to track and filter combinations. Combining math average/expected average and plotting hit/skips for these and comparing to game actual average might give some more filtering parameters. Hope you got it Good Luck | | |
Belgium Member #214858 April 17, 2021 2328 Posts Offline | Jeet % is Mod. Modulus : e.g. 3 % 2= 1 The output is the remainder of division. N % 2 =0 is even and N % 2 = 1 is odd. He has listed all straight possibilities of even-odd as the remainder(modulus operation). 0 0 0 0 0 is 5 evens pattern 1 1 1 1 1 is 5 odds pattern He shows positional occurrence but without headers, can't be sure. This is same as EEEEE and OOOOO difference is numbers vs alphabets. This mod style tracking fits better when we try beyond even odd and choose to track modulus of 3,4,5,6... to 9 or so. It's another way to track and filter combinations. Combining math average/expected average and plotting hit/skips for these and comparing to game actual average might give some more filtering parameters. Hope you got it Good Luck O/E or 1/0 remainder of integer division by 2 like learned as ten years old or younger. There is finer and better, that is the integer division by 3. If you make groups that is not better as you still make groups that don't change. This is stiff way penwork, not codework then. | | |
Belgium Member #214858 April 17, 2021 2328 Posts Offline | Mega Millions v % 2 pattern straight:
Scores: 5/5 to 0/5 You dont define what Mega v % 2 pattern straight is. You lack knowlege. You need more studies in mathematics and probability. The courses suck and they hide the good stuff. I have better. A box only helps for a cat that has to go pee bad. Do you mean Exkanzler Schröders Katze im Karton? | | |
United States Member #173010 February 13, 2016 1407 Posts Offline | O/E or 1/0 remainder of integer division by 2 like learned as ten years old or younger. There is finer and better, that is the integer division by 3. If you make groups that is not better as you still make groups that don't change. This is stiff way penwork, not codework then. Good. Some commercial lottery programs have these division based statistics and filters. | | |
Belgium Member #214858 April 17, 2021 2328 Posts Offline | Good. Some commercial lottery programs have these division based statistics and filters. They are not good at predicting. They would sell without ads. There was a team using SL at the sea. They stopped with SL after 1 year of playing lotto. The results were published on their website. I think that they had two ways, with and without SL. Those without scored as good if not better. | | |
United States Member #173010 February 13, 2016 1407 Posts Offline | They are not good at predicting. They would sell without ads. There was a team using SL at the sea. They stopped with SL after 1 year of playing lotto. The results were published on their website. I think that they had two ways, with and without SL. Those without scored as good if not better. I was going through one of the software's features videos. They have some sort of prediction algorithm. I don't see them bragging that they had a jackpot winner or so. I do see so many user feedbacks on their website. We won't know whether those are genuine or not. They are selling jackpot style games software at 150+$. And a pick game software for 150+$. | | |
Belgium Member #214858 April 17, 2021 2328 Posts Offline | I was going through one of the software's features videos. They have some sort of prediction algorithm. I don't see them bragging that they had a jackpot winner or so. I do see so many user feedbacks on their website. We won't know whether those are genuine or not. They are selling jackpot style games software at 150+$. And a pick game software for 150+$. I don't know of any prediction algorithm that works starting with random and mathematics. I don't buy, I win first and second prizes in simulations or real, depending of the games. For >$150 I can renew 365 Office and that is according to a friend not coming with in America existing updates (English American USA version).
It already comes with discrimination showing a black muslima in their gadget paint work panel that slows down their own system and work.
Displaying blacks here is racism against the local native population. ... | | |
|