Welcome Guest
You last visited January 28, 2022, 10:29 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

# Math Geniuses, Help!! "SLAG" Odd/Even Analysis - Chart I

156 replies. Last post 23 days ago by JeetKuneDoLotto.

 Page 2 of 11

Am I losing my mind here?

 Yes you are, the math is correct. [ 1 ] [11.11%] No you are not, the math is incorect. [ 2 ] [22.22%] I don't know, I lost my abacus. [ 4 ] [44.44%] I dont do Math, Math is Racist. [ 2 ] [22.22%] Total Valid Votes [ 9 ] Discarded Votes [ 5 ]

United States
Member #173010
February 13, 2016
1403 Posts
Offline

I came across this and I am not sure what to make of it.

Chart I is the Odd/Even Bias Tracker.

Honestly I almost never use "chart I" as I find there is almost never a strong bias, and its almost impossible to see a large bias in a long term trend in SLAP.

In the OLT (The Old Lottery Testament),  La Propheta says (and I paraphrase) "wait until you have a large bias of perhaps 15E, and then do a wheel with all Odd numbers."  Or something like that.

The trouble is that for lottery players, a bias of 15E has an occurence of perhaps once a year if you are lucky.

Unfortunately I don't have the patience to sit around and wait for that once a year chance.  It would probably happen when I am at vacation in Greece anyway.

(and I never met a lottery player, who just sat around not playing.)

I started to look at a possible bias in excel using straight subtraction, and was testing things, and then I wanted to compare my data to SLAG data.

And this data in SLAG confuses me.

So this is for three different games.

PA 5/43

How can a 26odd/24even have no bias?

For NY  Why would 10 more odd numbers have a bias of 4 odd?

Last but not least

FL

Thoughts, feelings, ideas?

Am I overlooking some metaphysical mathematical probabilty permutation distribution or something?

Where is the nexus?

Is there a better way to analyze this data?

What could be added to this chart to make it better?

Any feedback will be appreciated.

Until I can figure this out,  I will not be using this chart.

Please ignore the previous spredsheets(PB,NY,FL sheets shared earlier) and tables in my posts - they have some wrong formula.

NY Take 5 data from: https://data.ny.gov/widgets/dg63-4siq

NY take 5

 Date Draw type N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 Even Count Odd Count Total Even Balance Count Odd Balance Count Total Balance Count Even To Odd Totals Delta last 10 even last 10 odd last 10 E bias last 10 O bias BIAS INDICATOR 10/7/2021 Evening 10 12 13 25 27 2 3 5 21916 23144 45060 -1228 18 32 -14 14 O7 10/7/2021 Midday 1 5 9 13 26 1 4 5 21914 23141 45055 -1227 18 32 -14 14 O7 10/6/2021 Evening 3 9 22 25 29 1 4 5 21913 23137 45050 -1224 19 31 -12 12 O6 10/6/2021 Midday 13 23 35 38 39 1 4 5 21912 23133 45045 -1221 19 31 -12 12 O6 10/5/2021 Evening 1 5 8 12 29 2 3 5 21911 23129 45040 -1218 20 30 -10 10 O5 10/5/2021 Midday 6 9 10 11 25 2 3 5 21909 23126 45035 -1217 21 29 -8 8 O4 10/4/2021 Evening 15 19 25 29 33 0 5 5 21907 23123 45030 -1216 21 29 -8 8 O4 10/4/2021 Midday 2 20 29 35 37 2 3 5 21907 23118 45025 -1211 22 28 -6 6 O3 10/3/2021 Evening 1 4 16 18 19 3 2 5 21905 23115 45020 -1210 22 28 -6 6 O3 10/3/2021 Midday 18 19 22 24 38 4 1 5 21902 23113 45015 -1211 22 28 -6 6 O3 10/2/2021 Evening 21 24 25 26 39 2 3 5 21898 23112 45010 -1214 21 29 -8 8 O4 10/2/2021 Midday 19 29 33 36 38 2 3 5 21896 23109 45005 -1213 20 30 -10 10 O5 10/1/2021 Evening 1 9 13 23 38 1 4 5 21894 23106 45000 -1212 22 28 -6 6 O3 10/1/2021 Midday 1 12 17 26 37 2 3 5 21893 23102 44995 -1209 24 26 -2 2 O1 9/30/2021 Evening 6 9 21 30 34 3 2 5 21891 23099 44990 -1208 24 26 -2 2 O1 9/30/2021 Midday 26 27 31 36 39 2 3 5 21888 23097 44985 -1209 22 28 -6 6 O3 9/29/2021 Evening 1 7 10 33 39 1 4 5 21886 23094 44980 -1208 22 28 -6 6 O3 9/29/2021 Midday 15 22 30 33 35 2 3 5 21885 23090 44975 -1205 22 28 -6 6 O3 9/28/2021 Evening 5 14 18 22 33 3 2 5 21883 23087 44970 -1204 23 27 -4 4 O2 9/28/2021 Midday 1 2 7 16 30 3 2 5 21880 23085 44965 -1205 23 27 -4 4 O2 9/27/2021 Evening 1 11 13 21 22 1 4 5 21877 23083 44960 -1206 24 26 -2 2 O1 9/27/2021 Midday 3 16 20 32 38 4 1 5 21876 23079 44955 -1203 24 26 -2 2 O1 9/26/2021 Evening 24 25 28 33 34 3 2 5 21872 23078 44950 -1206 20 30 -10 10 O5 9/26/2021 Midday 3 4 5 8 33 2 3 5 21869 23076 44945 -1207 18 32 -14 14 O7

Pivot Bias Notations:

 Row Labels Count of BIAS INDICATOR E1 935 E10 12 E11 2 E12 2 E2 758 E3 544 E4 420 E5 242 E6 131 E7 97 E8 45 E9 25 None 1029 O0.5 2 O1 1100 O1.5 2 O10 25 O11 4 O2 1013 O3 856 O4 634 O5 525 O6 288 O7 183 O8 94 O9 43 Grand Total 9011

FL Fantasy 5

 Date Draw type N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 Even Count Odd Count Total Even Balance Count Odd Balance Count Total Balance Count Even To Odd Totals Delta last 10 even last 10 odd last 10 E bias last 10 O bias BIAS INDICATOR 10/6/2021 Evening 3 10 11 13 17 1 4 5 18393 18547 36940 -154 24 26 -2 2 O1 10/5/2021 Evening 9 12 13 17 26 2 3 5 18392 18543 36935 -151 24 26 -2 2 O1 10/4/2021 Evening 3 15 16 22 36 3 2 5 18390 18540 36930 -150 25 25 0 0 None 10/3/2021 Evening 2 10 12 14 17 4 1 5 18387 18538 36925 -151 24 26 -2 2 O1 10/2/2021 Evening 8 10 24 25 36 4 1 5 18383 18537 36920 -154 24 26 -2 2 O1 10/1/2021 Evening 4 13 15 23 25 1 4 5 18379 18536 36915 -157 22 28 -6 6 O3 9/30/2021 Evening 1 10 11 15 17 1 4 5 18378 18532 36910 -154 23 27 -4 4 O2 9/29/2021 Evening 14 19 23 26 32 3 2 5 18377 18528 36905 -151 24 26 -2 2 O1 9/28/2021 Evening 8 14 16 24 35 4 1 5 18374 18526 36900 -152 24 26 -2 2 O1 9/27/2021 Evening 1 5 7 11 34 1 4 5 18370 18525 36895 -155 23 27 -4 4 O2 9/26/2021 Evening 5 10 11 17 33 1 4 5 18369 18521 36890 -152 25 25 0 0 None 9/25/2021 Evening 7 8 17 18 22 3 2 5 18368 18517 36885 -149 26 24 2 -2 E1 9/24/2021 Evening 1 6 13 26 33 2 3 5 18365 18515 36880 -150 24 26 -2 2 O1 9/23/2021 Evening 6 14 18 21 26 4 1 5 18363 18512 36875 -149 25 25 0 0 None 9/22/2021 Evening 8 9 29 33 34 2 3 5 18359 18511 36870 -152 21 29 -8 8 O4 9/21/2021 Evening 2 5 8 17 23 2 3 5 18357 18508 36865 -151 22 28 -6 6 O3 9/20/2021 Evening 1 15 20 27 34 2 3 5 18355 18505 36860 -150 22 28 -6 6 O3 9/19/2021 Evening 3 4 5 6 30 3 2 5 18353 18502 36855 -149 22 28 -6 6 O3 9/18/2021 Evening 10 11 15 24 32 3 2 5 18350 18500 36850 -150 22 28 -6 6 O3 9/17/2021 Evening 7 20 26 27 28 3 2 5 18347 18498 36845 -151 21 29 -8 8 O4

 Row Labels Count of BIAS INDICATOR E1 829 E10 10 E11 4 E2 740 E3 562 E4 438 E5 251 E6 172 E7 96 E8 40 E9 18 None 864 O1 857 O1.5 1 O10 10 O11 5 O12 1 O13 3 O14 2 O2 776 O2.5 1 O3 596 O4 457 O4.5 2 O5 321 O6 179 O7 96 O8 39 O8.5 1 O9 17 (blank) Grand Total 7388

Shouldn't this how bias has to be calculated – ordered from latest draw to past draws in descending order?

For example, for 10/7/2021 Midday the row data should show me last ten counts 10/7/2021 Midday (including current day) to 10/3/2021 Evening

So, for pick 5 drawings in your example, 50 E/O indicators are present for 10 draws. A bias is when either even or odd goes above its ½ percentile. With 50: 25 E/25 O is normal - i.e., equally present without bias. The table points us to how the bias moved from Odd to Even every 10 draws.

Not sure how GH Advantage Gold handles it but for a normal user this tracking might be helpful.

Good Luck

United States
Member #173010
February 13, 2016
1403 Posts
Offline

Please ignore the previous spredsheets(PB,NY,FL sheets shared earlier) and tables in my posts - they have some wrong formula.

NY Take 5 data from: https://data.ny.gov/widgets/dg63-4siq

NY take 5

 Date Draw type N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 Even Count Odd Count Total Even Balance Count Odd Balance Count Total Balance Count Even To Odd Totals Delta last 10 even last 10 odd last 10 E bias last 10 O bias BIAS INDICATOR 10/7/2021 Evening 10 12 13 25 27 2 3 5 21916 23144 45060 -1228 18 32 -14 14 O7 10/7/2021 Midday 1 5 9 13 26 1 4 5 21914 23141 45055 -1227 18 32 -14 14 O7 10/6/2021 Evening 3 9 22 25 29 1 4 5 21913 23137 45050 -1224 19 31 -12 12 O6 10/6/2021 Midday 13 23 35 38 39 1 4 5 21912 23133 45045 -1221 19 31 -12 12 O6 10/5/2021 Evening 1 5 8 12 29 2 3 5 21911 23129 45040 -1218 20 30 -10 10 O5 10/5/2021 Midday 6 9 10 11 25 2 3 5 21909 23126 45035 -1217 21 29 -8 8 O4 10/4/2021 Evening 15 19 25 29 33 0 5 5 21907 23123 45030 -1216 21 29 -8 8 O4 10/4/2021 Midday 2 20 29 35 37 2 3 5 21907 23118 45025 -1211 22 28 -6 6 O3 10/3/2021 Evening 1 4 16 18 19 3 2 5 21905 23115 45020 -1210 22 28 -6 6 O3 10/3/2021 Midday 18 19 22 24 38 4 1 5 21902 23113 45015 -1211 22 28 -6 6 O3 10/2/2021 Evening 21 24 25 26 39 2 3 5 21898 23112 45010 -1214 21 29 -8 8 O4 10/2/2021 Midday 19 29 33 36 38 2 3 5 21896 23109 45005 -1213 20 30 -10 10 O5 10/1/2021 Evening 1 9 13 23 38 1 4 5 21894 23106 45000 -1212 22 28 -6 6 O3 10/1/2021 Midday 1 12 17 26 37 2 3 5 21893 23102 44995 -1209 24 26 -2 2 O1 9/30/2021 Evening 6 9 21 30 34 3 2 5 21891 23099 44990 -1208 24 26 -2 2 O1 9/30/2021 Midday 26 27 31 36 39 2 3 5 21888 23097 44985 -1209 22 28 -6 6 O3 9/29/2021 Evening 1 7 10 33 39 1 4 5 21886 23094 44980 -1208 22 28 -6 6 O3 9/29/2021 Midday 15 22 30 33 35 2 3 5 21885 23090 44975 -1205 22 28 -6 6 O3 9/28/2021 Evening 5 14 18 22 33 3 2 5 21883 23087 44970 -1204 23 27 -4 4 O2 9/28/2021 Midday 1 2 7 16 30 3 2 5 21880 23085 44965 -1205 23 27 -4 4 O2 9/27/2021 Evening 1 11 13 21 22 1 4 5 21877 23083 44960 -1206 24 26 -2 2 O1 9/27/2021 Midday 3 16 20 32 38 4 1 5 21876 23079 44955 -1203 24 26 -2 2 O1 9/26/2021 Evening 24 25 28 33 34 3 2 5 21872 23078 44950 -1206 20 30 -10 10 O5 9/26/2021 Midday 3 4 5 8 33 2 3 5 21869 23076 44945 -1207 18 32 -14 14 O7

Pivot Bias Notations:

 Row Labels Count of BIAS INDICATOR E1 935 E10 12 E11 2 E12 2 E2 758 E3 544 E4 420 E5 242 E6 131 E7 97 E8 45 E9 25 None 1029 O0.5 2 O1 1100 O1.5 2 O10 25 O11 4 O2 1013 O3 856 O4 634 O5 525 O6 288 O7 183 O8 94 O9 43 Grand Total 9011

FL Fantasy 5

 Date Draw type N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 Even Count Odd Count Total Even Balance Count Odd Balance Count Total Balance Count Even To Odd Totals Delta last 10 even last 10 odd last 10 E bias last 10 O bias BIAS INDICATOR 10/6/2021 Evening 3 10 11 13 17 1 4 5 18393 18547 36940 -154 24 26 -2 2 O1 10/5/2021 Evening 9 12 13 17 26 2 3 5 18392 18543 36935 -151 24 26 -2 2 O1 10/4/2021 Evening 3 15 16 22 36 3 2 5 18390 18540 36930 -150 25 25 0 0 None 10/3/2021 Evening 2 10 12 14 17 4 1 5 18387 18538 36925 -151 24 26 -2 2 O1 10/2/2021 Evening 8 10 24 25 36 4 1 5 18383 18537 36920 -154 24 26 -2 2 O1 10/1/2021 Evening 4 13 15 23 25 1 4 5 18379 18536 36915 -157 22 28 -6 6 O3 9/30/2021 Evening 1 10 11 15 17 1 4 5 18378 18532 36910 -154 23 27 -4 4 O2 9/29/2021 Evening 14 19 23 26 32 3 2 5 18377 18528 36905 -151 24 26 -2 2 O1 9/28/2021 Evening 8 14 16 24 35 4 1 5 18374 18526 36900 -152 24 26 -2 2 O1 9/27/2021 Evening 1 5 7 11 34 1 4 5 18370 18525 36895 -155 23 27 -4 4 O2 9/26/2021 Evening 5 10 11 17 33 1 4 5 18369 18521 36890 -152 25 25 0 0 None 9/25/2021 Evening 7 8 17 18 22 3 2 5 18368 18517 36885 -149 26 24 2 -2 E1 9/24/2021 Evening 1 6 13 26 33 2 3 5 18365 18515 36880 -150 24 26 -2 2 O1 9/23/2021 Evening 6 14 18 21 26 4 1 5 18363 18512 36875 -149 25 25 0 0 None 9/22/2021 Evening 8 9 29 33 34 2 3 5 18359 18511 36870 -152 21 29 -8 8 O4 9/21/2021 Evening 2 5 8 17 23 2 3 5 18357 18508 36865 -151 22 28 -6 6 O3 9/20/2021 Evening 1 15 20 27 34 2 3 5 18355 18505 36860 -150 22 28 -6 6 O3 9/19/2021 Evening 3 4 5 6 30 3 2 5 18353 18502 36855 -149 22 28 -6 6 O3 9/18/2021 Evening 10 11 15 24 32 3 2 5 18350 18500 36850 -150 22 28 -6 6 O3 9/17/2021 Evening 7 20 26 27 28 3 2 5 18347 18498 36845 -151 21 29 -8 8 O4

 Row Labels Count of BIAS INDICATOR E1 829 E10 10 E11 4 E2 740 E3 562 E4 438 E5 251 E6 172 E7 96 E8 40 E9 18 None 864 O1 857 O1.5 1 O10 10 O11 5 O12 1 O13 3 O14 2 O2 776 O2.5 1 O3 596 O4 457 O4.5 2 O5 321 O6 179 O7 96 O8 39 O8.5 1 O9 17 (blank) Grand Total 7388

Shouldn't this how bias has to be calculated – ordered from latest draw to past draws in descending order?

For example, for 10/7/2021 Midday the row data should show me last ten counts 10/7/2021 Midday (including current day) to 10/3/2021 Evening

So, for pick 5 drawings in your example, 50 E/O indicators are present for 10 draws. A bias is when either even or odd goes above its ½ percentile. With 50: 25 E/25 O is normal - i.e., equally present without bias. The table points us to how the bias moved from Odd to Even every 10 draws.

Not sure how GH Advantage Gold handles it but for a normal user this tracking might be helpful.

Good Luck

The fraction indicators occur up until We get to 10 draws from the very first draw. After the 10 draws are available there won't be fractions.

Advantage Gold may be slightly different from this bias table. I haven't read the book nor do I have the software. This is how I see the E/O bias.

Good Luck

 lottologixUnited StatesMember #139773March 3, 2013424 PostsOffline October 9, 2021, 12:34 amIts kinda strange looking at odd even only. The hi low odd even mix of 82 numbers comes out roughly 50 percent of the time in box pick 3 numbers. However it looks like you are looking at the big games. Thats a different ball of wax :)
 thamizhpayanUnited StatesMember #173010February 13, 20161403 PostsOffline October 9, 2021, 1:05 amQuote: Originally posted by lottologix on October 9, 2021Its kinda strange looking at odd even only. The hi low odd even mix of 82 numbers comes out roughly 50 percent of the time in box pick 3 numbers. However it looks like you are looking at the big games. Thats a different ball of wax :)Yes the software under discussion is more of for 5 or 6 pick JP/Big games.
 lottologixUnited StatesMember #139773March 3, 2013424 PostsOffline October 9, 2021, 1:45 amQuote: Originally posted by thamizhpayan on October 9, 2021Yes the software under discussion is more of for 5 or 6 pick JP/Big games.The thing with the big games is that you can get a hit roughly 34.5 percent of the time looking at the numbers in the last 15 draws
 thamizhpayanUnited StatesMember #173010February 13, 20161403 PostsOffline October 9, 2021, 4:00 amQuote: Originally posted by lottologix on October 9, 2021The thing with the big games is that you can get a hit roughly 34.5 percent of the time looking at the numbers in the last 15 drawsHit - how many numbers in how many tickets and how often?
 AllenBCaliforniaUnited StatesMember #167122June 27, 20151164 PostsOnline October 9, 2021, 4:47 amQuote: Originally posted by thamizhpayan on October 8, 2021The fraction indicators occur up until We get to 10 draws from the very first draw. After the 10 draws are available there won't be fractions. Advantage Gold may be slightly different from this bias table. I haven't read the book nor do I have the software. This is how I see the E/O bias. Good LuckIn a 5/69 draw there is 1 more odd ball than Even Balls.  Do you adjust the Even Count to account for this?

United States
Member #173010
February 13, 2016
1403 Posts
Offline

In a 5/69 draw there is 1 more odd ball than Even Balls.  Do you adjust the Even Count to account for this?

Allen

Good one.

Even Odd is naturally occurring characteristic feature of numbers. I haven't tried to change the balancing by introducing any bias equalization factor in bias tracking or so. There would be slight bias towards odd than even in these cases where we can't divide the matrix into exact halves.

In big games, I tend to see Low/High and In/Out differently as we split them up the way we want and when matrixes change, a number in these groups will switch from Low to High or In to Out vice versa based on where they are in the matrix (middle - where more transitions happen over matrix changes). This makes it difficult to take any advantage in tracking complete history in one view over single matrix – but running stats on past matrix sets might help identify some patterns). Even/Odd is more constant when compared to Low/High or In/Out.

After you mentioned, I was thinking about whether a bias skew balancer factor is needed to tackle this imbalance in unequal split 5/69 to 35 Odds and 34 Evens. I am just used to seeing the trend in overall Even Odd Movement for the current matrix.

Odd Even

25:24

Balance factor for 1 draw:

Odd -.5: Even+.5

50 numbers drawn in 10 draws: expected balance in fully balanced ½ split matrix is 25 EVENS and 25 ODDS.

So, for unequal 10 draws bias

My factor for 10 draws in pick 5 when there is a bias : 0.5 * 10 = 0.05

last 10 E bias: for even:  add factor

=(K2-L2) + (0.05*(L2-K2))

last 10 O bias: for odd: subtract factor

=L2-K2 - (0.05*(L2-K2))

Days when odd bias was in its peak:

02/14/2018

02/10/2018

09/24/2016

Taking 2/14/2018

Odd bias peak caused by:

 Game Date Draw Even Count Odd Count Total Even Balance Count Odd Balance Count Total Balance Count Even To Odd Totals Delta last 10 even last 10 odd last 10 E bias last 10 O bias BIAS INDICATOR Bias as Plottable number POWERBALL 02/14/2018 37-39-44-46-69 [26] 2 3 5 608 627 1235 -19 16 34 -17.1 17.1 O8.55 -8.55 POWERBALL 02/10/2018 1-13-27-41-59 [20] 0 5 5 606 624 1230 -18 16 34 -17.1 17.1 O8.55 -8.55 POWERBALL 02/07/2018 23-34-35-40-47 [10] 2 3 5 606 619 1225 -13 18 32 -13.3 13.3 O6.65 -6.65 POWERBALL 02/03/2018 15-23-27-48-53 [6] 1 4 5 604 616 1220 -12 19 31 -11.4 11.4 O5.7 -5.70 POWERBALL 01/31/2018 4-7-14-46-59 [22] 3 2 5 603 612 1215 -9 21 29 -7.6 7.6 O3.8 -3.80 POWERBALL 01/27/2018 17-21-26-47-54 [7] 2 3 5 600 610 1210 -10 21 29 -7.6 7.6 O3.8 -3.80

slided down to other side with more hopping of 3-2 and 2-3 and more 2-3(O-E):

 Game Date Draw Even Count Odd Count Total Even Balance Count Odd Balance Count Total Balance Count Even To Odd Totals Delta last 10 even last 10 odd last 10 E bias last 10 O bias BIAS INDICATOR Bias as Plottable number POWERBALL 03/10/2018 43-44-54-61-69 [22] 2 3 5 624 646 1270 -22 20 30 -9.5 9.5 O4.75 -4.75 POWERBALL 03/07/2018 6-13-19-36-51 [18] 2 3 5 622 643 1265 -21 19 31 -11.4 11.4 O5.7 -5.70 POWERBALL 03/03/2018 13-17-25-36-40 [5] 2 3 5 620 640 1260 -20 20 30 -9.5 9.5 O4.75 -4.75 POWERBALL 02/28/2018 12-30-59-65-69 [16] 2 3 5 618 637 1255 -19 20 30 -9.5 9.5 O4.75 -4.75 POWERBALL 02/24/2018 24-25-38-62-63 [6] 3 2 5 616 634 1250 -18 19 31 -11.4 11.4 O5.7 -5.70 POWERBALL 02/21/2018 7-15-31-34-36 [8] 2 3 5 613 632 1245 -19 19 31 -11.4 11.4 O5.7 -5.70 POWERBALL 02/17/2018 13-26-39-44-62 [2] 3 2 5 611 629 1240 -18 17 33 -15.2 15.2 O7.6 -7.60

Fully brought down to no bias with:

 Game Date Draw Even Count Odd Count Total Even Balance Count Odd Balance Count Total Balance Count Even To Odd Totals Delta last 10 even last 10 odd last 10 E bias last 10 O bias BIAS INDICATOR Bias as Plottable number POWERBALL 03/17/2018 22-57-59-60-66 [7] 3 2 5 631 649 1280 -18 25 25 0 0 None 0.00 POWERBALL 03/14/2018 6-12-24-41-68 [9] 4 1 5 628 647 1275 -19 22 28 -5.7 5.7 O2.85 -2.85

Not sure about the 10-count bias.

For even similar days when the bias was even peak value:

 06/17/2020 12/06/2017 12/02/2017 11/15/2017

 Game Date Draw Even Count Odd Count Total Even Balance Count Odd Balance Count Total Balance Count Even To Odd Totals Delta last 10 even last 10 odd last 10 E bias last 10 O bias BIAS INDICATOR Bias as Plottable number POWERBALL 07/01/2020 15-28-52-53-63 [18] 2 3 5 1213 1262 2475 -49 25 25 0 0 None 0.00 POWERBALL 06/27/2020 9-36-49-56-62 [8] 3 2 5 1211 1259 2470 -48 27 23 3.8 -3.8 E1.9 1.9 POWERBALL 06/24/2020 15-22-27-33-46 [23] 2 3 5 1208 1257 2465 -49 27 23 3.8 -3.8 E1.9 1.9 POWERBALL 06/20/2020 10-31-41-63-67 [5] 1 4 5 1206 1254 2460 -48 30 20 9.5 -9.5 E4.75 4.75 POWERBALL 06/17/2020 7-10-63-64-68 [10] 3 2 5 1205 1250 2455 -45 33 17 15.2 -15.2 E7.6 7.6 POWERBALL 06/13/2020 2-12-32-50-65 [5] 4 1 5 1202 1248 2450 -46 32 18 13.3 -13.3 E6.65 6.65 POWERBALL 06/10/2020 10-33-41-52-54 [18] 3 2 5 1198 1247 2445 -49 32 18 13.3 -13.3 E6.65 6.65 POWERBALL 06/06/2020 1-17-38-68-69 [18] 2 3 5 1195 1245 2440 -50 31 19 11.4 -11.4 E5.7 5.7 POWERBALL 06/03/2020 1-3-26-41-64 [17] 2 3 5 1193 1242 2435 -49 32 18 13.3 -13.3 E6.65 6.65 POWERBALL 05/30/2020 13-32-41-58-60 [14] 3 2 5 1191 1239 2430 -48 32 18 13.3 -13.3 E6.65 6.65 POWERBALL 05/27/2020 38-58-59-64-68 [21] 4 1 5 1188 1237 2425 -49 29 21 7.6 -7.6 E3.8 3.8 POWERBALL 05/23/2020 2-8-18-21-23 [16] 3 2 5 1184 1236 2420 -52 26 24 1.9 -1.9 E0.95 0.95 POWERBALL 05/20/2020 18-34-40-42-50 [9] 5 0 5 1181 1234 2415 -53 27 23 3.8 -3.8 E1.9 1.9 POWERBALL 05/16/2020 8-12-26-39-42 [11] 4 1 5 1176 1234 2410 -58 25 25 0 0 None 0.00

5/0, 4/1 and some 3/2 on one end favors the peak value. A trap can be set to catch 4/1 or ¼ or 5/1 or 1/5 bias. But it would be for short duration of 5 to 6 draws. And then retract.  Total of 7 times the top peak values for each side together happened.

Odd

02/14/2018

02/10/2018

09/24/2016

Even

06/17/2020

12/06/2017

12/02/2017

11/15/2017

Once a year the extreme peak happens(or 4 times in 5 years). There will be some more near extreme identifiers that might also be good candidate.  Finders Keepers.

If we can lock that 4-1 and 5-0 then it’s lesser set of numbers to deal with e.g., ½ of the numbers for 5-0 or 0-5. The catch is that the rest of the filters from own software/wheel/paid software/wheel or perfect combination of filters in tools like DMP-MG, TLEX and DMP-HT have to be set correctly to get 3/5, 4/5 or 5/5.

I started filtering my set of combos through DMP-MG. And as RL mentions, the numbers themselves need not be looked at directly till filling slips instead various filters with expected times and average times by probability can be used instead of them. I like DMP-MG, TLEX and DMP-HT as they focus on different characteristics of the same winning combos/all combos from another view.

This is just the Even Odd Bias. We can do In/Out, Low/High. There is no limit to tracking.

Using 2/3 3/2 O/E or E/O gives more combos to filter and deal with and in the game on more days to win. Whereas ¼ 0/5 4/1 5/0 give lesser combos to filter and deal with but keep us out of the game for more days and we are in real play on fewer days. I am more of unstable – I keep switching filters on every draw.

Let me know whether you you have any ideas or suggestions.

Good Luck

California
United States
Member #167122
June 27, 2015
1164 Posts
Online

Allen

Good one.

Even Odd is naturally occurring characteristic feature of numbers. I haven't tried to change the balancing by introducing any bias equalization factor in bias tracking or so. There would be slight bias towards odd than even in these cases where we can't divide the matrix into exact halves.

In big games, I tend to see Low/High and In/Out differently as we split them up the way we want and when matrixes change, a number in these groups will switch from Low to High or In to Out vice versa based on where they are in the matrix (middle - where more transitions happen over matrix changes). This makes it difficult to take any advantage in tracking complete history in one view over single matrix – but running stats on past matrix sets might help identify some patterns). Even/Odd is more constant when compared to Low/High or In/Out.

After you mentioned, I was thinking about whether a bias skew balancer factor is needed to tackle this imbalance in unequal split 5/69 to 35 Odds and 34 Evens. I am just used to seeing the trend in overall Even Odd Movement for the current matrix.

Odd Even

25:24

Balance factor for 1 draw:

Odd -.5: Even+.5

50 numbers drawn in 10 draws: expected balance in fully balanced ½ split matrix is 25 EVENS and 25 ODDS.

So, for unequal 10 draws bias

My factor for 10 draws in pick 5 when there is a bias : 0.5 * 10 = 0.05

last 10 E bias: for even:  add factor

=(K2-L2) + (0.05*(L2-K2))

last 10 O bias: for odd: subtract factor

=L2-K2 - (0.05*(L2-K2))

Days when odd bias was in its peak:

02/14/2018

02/10/2018

09/24/2016

Taking 2/14/2018

Odd bias peak caused by:

 Game Date Draw Even Count Odd Count Total Even Balance Count Odd Balance Count Total Balance Count Even To Odd Totals Delta last 10 even last 10 odd last 10 E bias last 10 O bias BIAS INDICATOR Bias as Plottable number POWERBALL 02/14/2018 37-39-44-46-69 [26] 2 3 5 608 627 1235 -19 16 34 -17.1 17.1 O8.55 -8.55 POWERBALL 02/10/2018 1-13-27-41-59 [20] 0 5 5 606 624 1230 -18 16 34 -17.1 17.1 O8.55 -8.55 POWERBALL 02/07/2018 23-34-35-40-47 [10] 2 3 5 606 619 1225 -13 18 32 -13.3 13.3 O6.65 -6.65 POWERBALL 02/03/2018 15-23-27-48-53 [6] 1 4 5 604 616 1220 -12 19 31 -11.4 11.4 O5.7 -5.70 POWERBALL 01/31/2018 4-7-14-46-59 [22] 3 2 5 603 612 1215 -9 21 29 -7.6 7.6 O3.8 -3.80 POWERBALL 01/27/2018 17-21-26-47-54 [7] 2 3 5 600 610 1210 -10 21 29 -7.6 7.6 O3.8 -3.80

slided down to other side with more hopping of 3-2 and 2-3 and more 2-3(O-E):

 Game Date Draw Even Count Odd Count Total Even Balance Count Odd Balance Count Total Balance Count Even To Odd Totals Delta last 10 even last 10 odd last 10 E bias last 10 O bias BIAS INDICATOR Bias as Plottable number POWERBALL 03/10/2018 43-44-54-61-69 [22] 2 3 5 624 646 1270 -22 20 30 -9.5 9.5 O4.75 -4.75 POWERBALL 03/07/2018 6-13-19-36-51 [18] 2 3 5 622 643 1265 -21 19 31 -11.4 11.4 O5.7 -5.70 POWERBALL 03/03/2018 13-17-25-36-40 [5] 2 3 5 620 640 1260 -20 20 30 -9.5 9.5 O4.75 -4.75 POWERBALL 02/28/2018 12-30-59-65-69 [16] 2 3 5 618 637 1255 -19 20 30 -9.5 9.5 O4.75 -4.75 POWERBALL 02/24/2018 24-25-38-62-63 [6] 3 2 5 616 634 1250 -18 19 31 -11.4 11.4 O5.7 -5.70 POWERBALL 02/21/2018 7-15-31-34-36 [8] 2 3 5 613 632 1245 -19 19 31 -11.4 11.4 O5.7 -5.70 POWERBALL 02/17/2018 13-26-39-44-62 [2] 3 2 5 611 629 1240 -18 17 33 -15.2 15.2 O7.6 -7.60

Fully brought down to no bias with:

 Game Date Draw Even Count Odd Count Total Even Balance Count Odd Balance Count Total Balance Count Even To Odd Totals Delta last 10 even last 10 odd last 10 E bias last 10 O bias BIAS INDICATOR Bias as Plottable number POWERBALL 03/17/2018 22-57-59-60-66 [7] 3 2 5 631 649 1280 -18 25 25 0 0 None 0.00 POWERBALL 03/14/2018 6-12-24-41-68 [9] 4 1 5 628 647 1275 -19 22 28 -5.7 5.7 O2.85 -2.85

Not sure about the 10-count bias.

For even similar days when the bias was even peak value:

 06/17/2020 12/06/2017 12/02/2017 11/15/2017

 Game Date Draw Even Count Odd Count Total Even Balance Count Odd Balance Count Total Balance Count Even To Odd Totals Delta last 10 even last 10 odd last 10 E bias last 10 O bias BIAS INDICATOR Bias as Plottable number POWERBALL 07/01/2020 15-28-52-53-63 [18] 2 3 5 1213 1262 2475 -49 25 25 0 0 None 0.00 POWERBALL 06/27/2020 9-36-49-56-62 [8] 3 2 5 1211 1259 2470 -48 27 23 3.8 -3.8 E1.9 1.9 POWERBALL 06/24/2020 15-22-27-33-46 [23] 2 3 5 1208 1257 2465 -49 27 23 3.8 -3.8 E1.9 1.9 POWERBALL 06/20/2020 10-31-41-63-67 [5] 1 4 5 1206 1254 2460 -48 30 20 9.5 -9.5 E4.75 4.75 POWERBALL 06/17/2020 7-10-63-64-68 [10] 3 2 5 1205 1250 2455 -45 33 17 15.2 -15.2 E7.6 7.6 POWERBALL 06/13/2020 2-12-32-50-65 [5] 4 1 5 1202 1248 2450 -46 32 18 13.3 -13.3 E6.65 6.65 POWERBALL 06/10/2020 10-33-41-52-54 [18] 3 2 5 1198 1247 2445 -49 32 18 13.3 -13.3 E6.65 6.65 POWERBALL 06/06/2020 1-17-38-68-69 [18] 2 3 5 1195 1245 2440 -50 31 19 11.4 -11.4 E5.7 5.7 POWERBALL 06/03/2020 1-3-26-41-64 [17] 2 3 5 1193 1242 2435 -49 32 18 13.3 -13.3 E6.65 6.65 POWERBALL 05/30/2020 13-32-41-58-60 [14] 3 2 5 1191 1239 2430 -48 32 18 13.3 -13.3 E6.65 6.65 POWERBALL 05/27/2020 38-58-59-64-68 [21] 4 1 5 1188 1237 2425 -49 29 21 7.6 -7.6 E3.8 3.8 POWERBALL 05/23/2020 2-8-18-21-23 [16] 3 2 5 1184 1236 2420 -52 26 24 1.9 -1.9 E0.95 0.95 POWERBALL 05/20/2020 18-34-40-42-50 [9] 5 0 5 1181 1234 2415 -53 27 23 3.8 -3.8 E1.9 1.9 POWERBALL 05/16/2020 8-12-26-39-42 [11] 4 1 5 1176 1234 2410 -58 25 25 0 0 None 0.00

5/0, 4/1 and some 3/2 on one end favors the peak value. A trap can be set to catch 4/1 or ¼ or 5/1 or 1/5 bias. But it would be for short duration of 5 to 6 draws. And then retract.  Total of 7 times the top peak values for each side together happened.

Odd

02/14/2018

02/10/2018

09/24/2016

Even

06/17/2020

12/06/2017

12/02/2017

11/15/2017

Once a year the extreme peak happens(or 4 times in 5 years). There will be some more near extreme identifiers that might also be good candidate.  Finders Keepers.

If we can lock that 4-1 and 5-0 then it’s lesser set of numbers to deal with e.g., ½ of the numbers for 5-0 or 0-5. The catch is that the rest of the filters from own software/wheel/paid software/wheel or perfect combination of filters in tools like DMP-MG, TLEX and DMP-HT have to be set correctly to get 3/5, 4/5 or 5/5.

I started filtering my set of combos through DMP-MG. And as RL mentions, the numbers themselves need not be looked at directly till filling slips instead various filters with expected times and average times by probability can be used instead of them. I like DMP-MG, TLEX and DMP-HT as they focus on different characteristics of the same winning combos/all combos from another view.

This is just the Even Odd Bias. We can do In/Out, Low/High. There is no limit to tracking.

Using 2/3 3/2 O/E or E/O gives more combos to filter and deal with and in the game on more days to win. Whereas ¼ 0/5 4/1 5/0 give lesser combos to filter and deal with but keep us out of the game for more days and we are in real play on fewer days. I am more of unstable – I keep switching filters on every draw.

Let me know whether you you have any ideas or suggestions.

Good Luck

It Seems logical to me to multiply the Even Count by 1.05 to "Level the Field"

Despite doing this there still is Bias to a larger Odd Count than Even.

I Track 5/39 Games (currently maintaining California and Ohio)

Tracking Total Game Counts.  Also doing a 365 Count and setting up formulas to do lesser counts like 10 or maybe 39 Draws.

I am getting the feeling that this might be a Rabbit Hole so I flipped on my headlamp and I will slide on down to have a Look.

Your Bias Indicators Values in the Right 2 Columns are 1/2 of Bias Counts.  Why?

Back to the Tunnels.

Remember the episode of Star Trek where Frank Gorshin played 2 different characters?  One had the right side of his face Black and the Left side was White.  The other Character was the Exact Opposite.  I was "born" in the OE Clan.  We are the exact opposite of your EO Clan.  We say minus when you say plus.

 thamizhpayanUnited StatesMember #173010February 13, 20161403 PostsOffline October 9, 2021, 1:03 pmQuote: Originally posted by AllenB on October 9, 2021It Seems logical to me to multiply the Even Count by 1.05 to "Level the Field"Despite doing this there still is Bias to a larger Odd Count than Even.I Track 5/39 Games (currently maintaining California and Ohio)Tracking Total Game Counts.  Also doing a 365 Count and setting up formulas to do lesser counts like 10 or maybe 39 Draws.I am getting the feeling that this might be a Rabbit Hole so I flipped on my headlamp and I will slide on down to have a Look.Your Bias Indicators Values in the Right 2 Columns are 1/2 of Bias Counts.  Why?Back to the Tunnels.Remember the episode of Star Trek where Frank Gorshin played 2 different characters?  One had the right side of his face Black and the Left side was White.  The other Character was the Exact Opposite.  I was "born" in the OE Clan.  We are the exact opposite of your EO Clan.  We say minus when you say plus.Hi AllenB,For me, last 10 E bias and last 10 O bias are how much space of odd that even took over from the total 25 spaces and vice versa. I derived the bias indicator off of OP(JeetKuneDoLotto)’s SLAG (Smart Luck Advantage Gold) value(almost) – It looks like in-order to reach the evenness (not even/odd even but the ½ balance), how far we have to slide odd or even to the other side.So, far -13.3 Odd bias, I have to drag the balance stick (like a FM radio knob/slider) -6.65 to bring it to the center. This is because the columns show how far away, they are from each other – not center (last 10 E bias and last 10 O bias). Remember I didn’t add the 1 odd difference factor to last 10 even and last 10 odd, rather I took it from last 10 E bias and last 10 O bias.I think 20,30,40 draws might be good periods to go after. I am stuck between two tools/languages – Java to produce excel output and then few excel manipulations with formulae. Good Luck
 lottologixUnited StatesMember #139773March 3, 2013424 PostsOffline October 9, 2021, 7:44 pmThat comes out to approximately 324,640 possible combinations in the last 15 games if all the numbers were with no repeating digits. It does vary from draw to draw so the possible combinations are less, this is where G Howards methods come in.
 thamizhpayanUnited StatesMember #173010February 13, 20161403 PostsOffline October 9, 2021, 7:58 pmQuote: Originally posted by lottologix on October 9, 2021That comes out to approximately 324,640 possible combinations in the last 15 games if all the numbers were with no repeating digits. It does vary from draw to draw so the possible combinations are less, this is where G Howards methods come in.No last digit repetition?And wheel all numbers from last 15 games and filter out every combo that has at least one lat digit repeat?Is this how you arrive at 324,640 combos?
 lottologixUnited StatesMember #139773March 3, 2013424 PostsOffline October 9, 2021, 8:19 pmNo looking at my backtest I see that with repeating digits in the last 15 games it usually comes out around 35 numbers in a 69 number game only counting each repeating digit once this is where i get the approximate 324,640 number from. It is not written in stone the game constantly fluctuates. Also I noticed that some of the numbers that show up in the next draw only came out once in the last 15 games. So if I were to try to pick out numbers to play in the next game I would use Gail Howard's tools looking at sums and other indicators that not just  all of the numbers in a set from the last 15 games but try to find those number sets that came out only once in the last 15 games. However keep in mind you dont just play only numbers that came out once in the last 15 games but look for balanced number sets from all the digits in the last 15 games that include numbers that only came out once.
 JeetKuneDoLottoThread StarterFlat EarthUnited StatesMember #161360November 27, 2014476 PostsOffline October 9, 2021, 8:36 pmQuote: Originally posted by thamizhpayan on October 8, 2021The fraction indicators occur up until We get to 10 draws from the very first draw. After the 10 draws are available there won't be fractions. Advantage Gold may be slightly different from this bias table. I haven't read the book nor do I have the software. This is how I see the E/O bias. Good LuckThanks for the replies Mr. Thamiz.  I only looked at PB so far in the google docs.  I have to look at your updated stuff later.I dont use sheetz.  I have office 365. (Which I am a little upset about since Bill Gates probably eats babies with Marina Abramovich)That ok, they are probably just Haitian babies.  The worser part is that Google probably raises the babies in D.U.M.B.'s under the Mother of Darkness Castle in Belgium...but going off topic....I suppose I will focus on NY and FL, as I dont play PB yet.  I am waiting for them to raise the cost to five dollars a game, 6 with power play.  Then I will be really interested in it!!!The only thing that would get me more interested in PB would be if when the JP reached the 1 BILLION DOLLAR mark, they replaced the money with some of that Hunter Biden Cocaine and Hooker inspired artwork, I would buy 1000 thousand lines for shizzle my nizzle!!!(Sorry going off topic again.)With SLAG, I can import to Notepad and then paste in excel.   Here is what it looks like for Florida.You can see that the odds and even bias would have to be parsed into different columns and I would have to make one of them negative to separate the Bias column values.I may try it to see how the long term trend looks when I get some more free time.  Now my "ghetto" bias math method currently in excel is just to take the sum odds in the last ten games and subtract the sum even in the last ten games.I guess its not the "purist" form of math/trend analysis, but I do see that you can get some major extremes and also a general trend over time.I just made this today, and it is approx last 720 draws, which is approx last TWO YEARS. Does this help?  I dont know.  Its very hard to get a birds eye view on the trends on this little computer screen.I dont know if I labeled this graph correctly. It is the sum of odds in the last ten games minus sum of evens in last ten games.[ΣOddslast10  - ΣEvenslast10  ]So the 30 is the max bias towards the Odds side, and the negative 20 is the max bias towards the evens side.And this is assuming my math is correct, as I did not double check my work. Teacher Help!!!Is it even correct to call that a "BIAS"?  Well obviously it is not a BIAS as defined in SLAG,  is their a more correct "mathematical term" for bias?   IMHO, this graph would be best utilized when cross-referencing with the DSH.
 thamizhpayanUnited StatesMember #173010February 13, 20161403 PostsOffline October 9, 2021, 8:50 pmQuote: Originally posted by JeetKuneDoLotto on October 9, 2021Thanks for the replies Mr. Thamiz.  I only looked at PB so far in the google docs.  I have to look at your updated stuff later.I dont use sheetz.  I have office 365. (Which I am a little upset about since Bill Gates probably eats babies with Marina Abramovich)That ok, they are probably just Haitian babies.  The worser part is that Google probably raises the babies in D.U.M.B.'s under the Mother of Darkness Castle in Belgium...but going off topic....I suppose I will focus on NY and FL, as I dont play PB yet.  I am waiting for them to raise the cost to five dollars a game, 6 with power play.  Then I will be really interested in it!!!