- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 5:02 pm
You last visited
April 19, 2024, 3:24 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Math Geniuses, Help!! "SLAG" Odd/Even Analysis - Chart IPrev TopicNext Topic
Am I losing my mind here?
-
Quote: Originally posted by JeetKuneDoLotto on Oct 7, 2021
I came across this and I am not sure what to make of it.
Chart I is the Odd/Even Bias Tracker.
Honestly I almost never use "chart I" as I find there is almost never a strong bias, and its almost impossible to see a large bias in a long term trend in SLAP.
In the OLT (The Old Lottery Testament), La Propheta says (and I paraphrase) "wait until you have a large bias of perhaps 15E, and then do a wheel with all Odd numbers." Or something like that.
The trouble is that for lottery players, a bias of 15E has an occurence of perhaps once a year if you are lucky.
Unfortunately I don't have the patience to sit around and wait for that once a year chance. It would probably happen when I am at vacation in Greece anyway.
(and I never met a lottery player, who just sat around not playing.)
I started to look at a possible bias in excel using straight subtraction, and was testing things, and then I wanted to compare my data to SLAG data.
And this data in SLAG confuses me.
So this is for three different games.
PA 5/43
How can a 26odd/24even have no bias?
For NY Why would 10 more odd numbers have a bias of 4 odd?
Last but not least
FL
Thoughts, feelings, ideas?
Am I overlooking some metaphysical mathematical probabilty permutation distribution or something?
Where is the nexus?
Is there a better way to analyze this data?
What could be added to this chart to make it better?
Any feedback will be appreciated.
Until I can figure this out, I will not be using this chart.
Please ignore the previous spredsheets(PB,NY,FL sheets shared earlier) and tables in my posts - they have some wrong formula.
NY Take 5 data from: https://data.ny.gov/widgets/dg63-4siq
NY take 5
Date
Draw type
N1
N2
N3
N4
N5
Even Count
Odd Count
Total
Even Balance Count
Odd Balance Count
Total Balance Count
Even To Odd Totals Delta
last 10 even
last 10 odd
last 10 E bias
last 10 O bias
BIAS INDICATOR
10/7/2021
Evening
10
12
13
25
27
2
3
5
21916
23144
45060
-1228
18
32
-14
14
O7
10/7/2021
Midday
1
5
9
13
26
1
4
5
21914
23141
45055
-1227
18
32
-14
14
O7
10/6/2021
Evening
3
9
22
25
29
1
4
5
21913
23137
45050
-1224
19
31
-12
12
O6
10/6/2021
Midday
13
23
35
38
39
1
4
5
21912
23133
45045
-1221
19
31
-12
12
O6
10/5/2021
Evening
1
5
8
12
29
2
3
5
21911
23129
45040
-1218
20
30
-10
10
O5
10/5/2021
Midday
6
9
10
11
25
2
3
5
21909
23126
45035
-1217
21
29
-8
8
O4
10/4/2021
Evening
15
19
25
29
33
0
5
5
21907
23123
45030
-1216
21
29
-8
8
O4
10/4/2021
Midday
2
20
29
35
37
2
3
5
21907
23118
45025
-1211
22
28
-6
6
O3
10/3/2021
Evening
1
4
16
18
19
3
2
5
21905
23115
45020
-1210
22
28
-6
6
O3
10/3/2021
Midday
18
19
22
24
38
4
1
5
21902
23113
45015
-1211
22
28
-6
6
O3
10/2/2021
Evening
21
24
25
26
39
2
3
5
21898
23112
45010
-1214
21
29
-8
8
O4
10/2/2021
Midday
19
29
33
36
38
2
3
5
21896
23109
45005
-1213
20
30
-10
10
O5
10/1/2021
Evening
1
9
13
23
38
1
4
5
21894
23106
45000
-1212
22
28
-6
6
O3
10/1/2021
Midday
1
12
17
26
37
2
3
5
21893
23102
44995
-1209
24
26
-2
2
O1
9/30/2021
Evening
6
9
21
30
34
3
2
5
21891
23099
44990
-1208
24
26
-2
2
O1
9/30/2021
Midday
26
27
31
36
39
2
3
5
21888
23097
44985
-1209
22
28
-6
6
O3
9/29/2021
Evening
1
7
10
33
39
1
4
5
21886
23094
44980
-1208
22
28
-6
6
O3
9/29/2021
Midday
15
22
30
33
35
2
3
5
21885
23090
44975
-1205
22
28
-6
6
O3
9/28/2021
Evening
5
14
18
22
33
3
2
5
21883
23087
44970
-1204
23
27
-4
4
O2
9/28/2021
Midday
1
2
7
16
30
3
2
5
21880
23085
44965
-1205
23
27
-4
4
O2
9/27/2021
Evening
1
11
13
21
22
1
4
5
21877
23083
44960
-1206
24
26
-2
2
O1
9/27/2021
Midday
3
16
20
32
38
4
1
5
21876
23079
44955
-1203
24
26
-2
2
O1
9/26/2021
Evening
24
25
28
33
34
3
2
5
21872
23078
44950
-1206
20
30
-10
10
O5
9/26/2021
Midday
3
4
5
8
33
2
3
5
21869
23076
44945
-1207
18
32
-14
14
O7
Pivot Bias Notations:
Row Labels
Count of BIAS INDICATOR
E1
935
E10
12
E11
2
E12
2
E2
758
E3
544
E4
420
E5
242
E6
131
E7
97
E8
45
E9
25
None
1029
O0.5
2
O1
1100
O1.5
2
O10
25
O11
4
O2
1013
O3
856
O4
634
O5
525
O6
288
O7
183
O8
94
O9
43
Grand Total
9011
FL Fantasy 5
Date
Draw type
N1
N2
N3
N4
N5
Even Count
Odd Count
Total
Even Balance Count
Odd Balance Count
Total Balance Count
Even To Odd Totals Delta
last 10 even
last 10 odd
last 10 E bias
last 10 O bias
BIAS INDICATOR
10/6/2021
Evening
3
10
11
13
17
1
4
5
18393
18547
36940
-154
24
26
-2
2
O1
10/5/2021
Evening
9
12
13
17
26
2
3
5
18392
18543
36935
-151
24
26
-2
2
O1
10/4/2021
Evening
3
15
16
22
36
3
2
5
18390
18540
36930
-150
25
25
0
0
None
10/3/2021
Evening
2
10
12
14
17
4
1
5
18387
18538
36925
-151
24
26
-2
2
O1
10/2/2021
Evening
8
10
24
25
36
4
1
5
18383
18537
36920
-154
24
26
-2
2
O1
10/1/2021
Evening
4
13
15
23
25
1
4
5
18379
18536
36915
-157
22
28
-6
6
O3
9/30/2021
Evening
1
10
11
15
17
1
4
5
18378
18532
36910
-154
23
27
-4
4
O2
9/29/2021
Evening
14
19
23
26
32
3
2
5
18377
18528
36905
-151
24
26
-2
2
O1
9/28/2021
Evening
8
14
16
24
35
4
1
5
18374
18526
36900
-152
24
26
-2
2
O1
9/27/2021
Evening
1
5
7
11
34
1
4
5
18370
18525
36895
-155
23
27
-4
4
O2
9/26/2021
Evening
5
10
11
17
33
1
4
5
18369
18521
36890
-152
25
25
0
0
None
9/25/2021
Evening
7
8
17
18
22
3
2
5
18368
18517
36885
-149
26
24
2
-2
E1
9/24/2021
Evening
1
6
13
26
33
2
3
5
18365
18515
36880
-150
24
26
-2
2
O1
9/23/2021
Evening
6
14
18
21
26
4
1
5
18363
18512
36875
-149
25
25
0
0
None
9/22/2021
Evening
8
9
29
33
34
2
3
5
18359
18511
36870
-152
21
29
-8
8
O4
9/21/2021
Evening
2
5
8
17
23
2
3
5
18357
18508
36865
-151
22
28
-6
6
O3
9/20/2021
Evening
1
15
20
27
34
2
3
5
18355
18505
36860
-150
22
28
-6
6
O3
9/19/2021
Evening
3
4
5
6
30
3
2
5
18353
18502
36855
-149
22
28
-6
6
O3
9/18/2021
Evening
10
11
15
24
32
3
2
5
18350
18500
36850
-150
22
28
-6
6
O3
9/17/2021
Evening
7
20
26
27
28
3
2
5
18347
18498
36845
-151
21
29
-8
8
O4
Row Labels
Count of BIAS INDICATOR
E1
829
E10
10
E11
4
E2
740
E3
562
E4
438
E5
251
E6
172
E7
96
E8
40
E9
18
None
864
O1
857
O1.5
1
O10
10
O11
5
O12
1
O13
3
O14
2
O2
776
O2.5
1
O3
596
O4
457
O4.5
2
O5
321
O6
179
O7
96
O8
39
O8.5
1
O9
17
(blank)
Grand Total
7388
Shouldn't this how bias has to be calculated – ordered from latest draw to past draws in descending order?
For example, for 10/7/2021 Midday the row data should show me last ten counts 10/7/2021 Midday (including current day) to 10/3/2021 Evening
So, for pick 5 drawings in your example, 50 E/O indicators are present for 10 draws. A bias is when either even or odd goes above its ½ percentile. With 50: 25 E/25 O is normal - i.e., equally present without bias. The table points us to how the bias moved from Odd to Even every 10 draws.
Not sure how GH Advantage Gold handles it but for a normal user this tracking might be helpful.
Good Luck
-
Quote: Originally posted by thamizhpayan on Oct 8, 2021
Please ignore the previous spredsheets(PB,NY,FL sheets shared earlier) and tables in my posts - they have some wrong formula.
NY Take 5 data from: https://data.ny.gov/widgets/dg63-4siq
NY take 5
Date
Draw type
N1
N2
N3
N4
N5
Even Count
Odd Count
Total
Even Balance Count
Odd Balance Count
Total Balance Count
Even To Odd Totals Delta
last 10 even
last 10 odd
last 10 E bias
last 10 O bias
BIAS INDICATOR
10/7/2021
Evening
10
12
13
25
27
2
3
5
21916
23144
45060
-1228
18
32
-14
14
O7
10/7/2021
Midday
1
5
9
13
26
1
4
5
21914
23141
45055
-1227
18
32
-14
14
O7
10/6/2021
Evening
3
9
22
25
29
1
4
5
21913
23137
45050
-1224
19
31
-12
12
O6
10/6/2021
Midday
13
23
35
38
39
1
4
5
21912
23133
45045
-1221
19
31
-12
12
O6
10/5/2021
Evening
1
5
8
12
29
2
3
5
21911
23129
45040
-1218
20
30
-10
10
O5
10/5/2021
Midday
6
9
10
11
25
2
3
5
21909
23126
45035
-1217
21
29
-8
8
O4
10/4/2021
Evening
15
19
25
29
33
0
5
5
21907
23123
45030
-1216
21
29
-8
8
O4
10/4/2021
Midday
2
20
29
35
37
2
3
5
21907
23118
45025
-1211
22
28
-6
6
O3
10/3/2021
Evening
1
4
16
18
19
3
2
5
21905
23115
45020
-1210
22
28
-6
6
O3
10/3/2021
Midday
18
19
22
24
38
4
1
5
21902
23113
45015
-1211
22
28
-6
6
O3
10/2/2021
Evening
21
24
25
26
39
2
3
5
21898
23112
45010
-1214
21
29
-8
8
O4
10/2/2021
Midday
19
29
33
36
38
2
3
5
21896
23109
45005
-1213
20
30
-10
10
O5
10/1/2021
Evening
1
9
13
23
38
1
4
5
21894
23106
45000
-1212
22
28
-6
6
O3
10/1/2021
Midday
1
12
17
26
37
2
3
5
21893
23102
44995
-1209
24
26
-2
2
O1
9/30/2021
Evening
6
9
21
30
34
3
2
5
21891
23099
44990
-1208
24
26
-2
2
O1
9/30/2021
Midday
26
27
31
36
39
2
3
5
21888
23097
44985
-1209
22
28
-6
6
O3
9/29/2021
Evening
1
7
10
33
39
1
4
5
21886
23094
44980
-1208
22
28
-6
6
O3
9/29/2021
Midday
15
22
30
33
35
2
3
5
21885
23090
44975
-1205
22
28
-6
6
O3
9/28/2021
Evening
5
14
18
22
33
3
2
5
21883
23087
44970
-1204
23
27
-4
4
O2
9/28/2021
Midday
1
2
7
16
30
3
2
5
21880
23085
44965
-1205
23
27
-4
4
O2
9/27/2021
Evening
1
11
13
21
22
1
4
5
21877
23083
44960
-1206
24
26
-2
2
O1
9/27/2021
Midday
3
16
20
32
38
4
1
5
21876
23079
44955
-1203
24
26
-2
2
O1
9/26/2021
Evening
24
25
28
33
34
3
2
5
21872
23078
44950
-1206
20
30
-10
10
O5
9/26/2021
Midday
3
4
5
8
33
2
3
5
21869
23076
44945
-1207
18
32
-14
14
O7
Pivot Bias Notations:
Row Labels
Count of BIAS INDICATOR
E1
935
E10
12
E11
2
E12
2
E2
758
E3
544
E4
420
E5
242
E6
131
E7
97
E8
45
E9
25
None
1029
O0.5
2
O1
1100
O1.5
2
O10
25
O11
4
O2
1013
O3
856
O4
634
O5
525
O6
288
O7
183
O8
94
O9
43
Grand Total
9011
FL Fantasy 5
Date
Draw type
N1
N2
N3
N4
N5
Even Count
Odd Count
Total
Even Balance Count
Odd Balance Count
Total Balance Count
Even To Odd Totals Delta
last 10 even
last 10 odd
last 10 E bias
last 10 O bias
BIAS INDICATOR
10/6/2021
Evening
3
10
11
13
17
1
4
5
18393
18547
36940
-154
24
26
-2
2
O1
10/5/2021
Evening
9
12
13
17
26
2
3
5
18392
18543
36935
-151
24
26
-2
2
O1
10/4/2021
Evening
3
15
16
22
36
3
2
5
18390
18540
36930
-150
25
25
0
0
None
10/3/2021
Evening
2
10
12
14
17
4
1
5
18387
18538
36925
-151
24
26
-2
2
O1
10/2/2021
Evening
8
10
24
25
36
4
1
5
18383
18537
36920
-154
24
26
-2
2
O1
10/1/2021
Evening
4
13
15
23
25
1
4
5
18379
18536
36915
-157
22
28
-6
6
O3
9/30/2021
Evening
1
10
11
15
17
1
4
5
18378
18532
36910
-154
23
27
-4
4
O2
9/29/2021
Evening
14
19
23
26
32
3
2
5
18377
18528
36905
-151
24
26
-2
2
O1
9/28/2021
Evening
8
14
16
24
35
4
1
5
18374
18526
36900
-152
24
26
-2
2
O1
9/27/2021
Evening
1
5
7
11
34
1
4
5
18370
18525
36895
-155
23
27
-4
4
O2
9/26/2021
Evening
5
10
11
17
33
1
4
5
18369
18521
36890
-152
25
25
0
0
None
9/25/2021
Evening
7
8
17
18
22
3
2
5
18368
18517
36885
-149
26
24
2
-2
E1
9/24/2021
Evening
1
6
13
26
33
2
3
5
18365
18515
36880
-150
24
26
-2
2
O1
9/23/2021
Evening
6
14
18
21
26
4
1
5
18363
18512
36875
-149
25
25
0
0
None
9/22/2021
Evening
8
9
29
33
34
2
3
5
18359
18511
36870
-152
21
29
-8
8
O4
9/21/2021
Evening
2
5
8
17
23
2
3
5
18357
18508
36865
-151
22
28
-6
6
O3
9/20/2021
Evening
1
15
20
27
34
2
3
5
18355
18505
36860
-150
22
28
-6
6
O3
9/19/2021
Evening
3
4
5
6
30
3
2
5
18353
18502
36855
-149
22
28
-6
6
O3
9/18/2021
Evening
10
11
15
24
32
3
2
5
18350
18500
36850
-150
22
28
-6
6
O3
9/17/2021
Evening
7
20
26
27
28
3
2
5
18347
18498
36845
-151
21
29
-8
8
O4
Row Labels
Count of BIAS INDICATOR
E1
829
E10
10
E11
4
E2
740
E3
562
E4
438
E5
251
E6
172
E7
96
E8
40
E9
18
None
864
O1
857
O1.5
1
O10
10
O11
5
O12
1
O13
3
O14
2
O2
776
O2.5
1
O3
596
O4
457
O4.5
2
O5
321
O6
179
O7
96
O8
39
O8.5
1
O9
17
(blank)
Grand Total
7388
Shouldn't this how bias has to be calculated – ordered from latest draw to past draws in descending order?
For example, for 10/7/2021 Midday the row data should show me last ten counts 10/7/2021 Midday (including current day) to 10/3/2021 Evening
So, for pick 5 drawings in your example, 50 E/O indicators are present for 10 draws. A bias is when either even or odd goes above its ½ percentile. With 50: 25 E/25 O is normal - i.e., equally present without bias. The table points us to how the bias moved from Odd to Even every 10 draws.
Not sure how GH Advantage Gold handles it but for a normal user this tracking might be helpful.
Good Luck
The fraction indicators occur up until We get to 10 draws from the very first draw. After the 10 draws are available there won't be fractions.
Advantage Gold may be slightly different from this bias table. I haven't read the book nor do I have the software. This is how I see the E/O bias.
Good Luck
-
Its kinda strange looking at odd even only. The hi low odd even mix of 82 numbers comes out roughly 50 percent of the time in box pick 3 numbers. However it looks like you are looking at the big games. Thats a different ball of wax :)
-
Quote: Originally posted by lottologix on Oct 9, 2021
Its kinda strange looking at odd even only. The hi low odd even mix of 82 numbers comes out roughly 50 percent of the time in box pick 3 numbers. However it looks like you are looking at the big games. Thats a different ball of wax :)
Yes the software under discussion is more of for 5 or 6 pick JP/Big games.
-
Quote: Originally posted by thamizhpayan on Oct 9, 2021
Yes the software under discussion is more of for 5 or 6 pick JP/Big games.
The thing with the big games is that you can get a hit roughly 34.5 percent of the time looking at the numbers in the last 15 draws
-
Quote: Originally posted by lottologix on Oct 9, 2021
The thing with the big games is that you can get a hit roughly 34.5 percent of the time looking at the numbers in the last 15 draws
Hit - how many numbers in how many tickets and how often?
-
Quote: Originally posted by thamizhpayan on Oct 8, 2021
The fraction indicators occur up until We get to 10 draws from the very first draw. After the 10 draws are available there won't be fractions.
Advantage Gold may be slightly different from this bias table. I haven't read the book nor do I have the software. This is how I see the E/O bias.
Good Luck
In a 5/69 draw there is 1 more odd ball than Even Balls. Do you adjust the Even Count to account for this?
-
Quote: Originally posted by AllenB on Oct 9, 2021
In a 5/69 draw there is 1 more odd ball than Even Balls. Do you adjust the Even Count to account for this?
Allen
Good one.
Big reply so please take time to read it.
Even Odd is naturally occurring characteristic feature of numbers. I haven't tried to change the balancing by introducing any bias equalization factor in bias tracking or so. There would be slight bias towards odd than even in these cases where we can't divide the matrix into exact halves.
In big games, I tend to see Low/High and In/Out differently as we split them up the way we want and when matrixes change, a number in these groups will switch from Low to High or In to Out vice versa based on where they are in the matrix (middle - where more transitions happen over matrix changes). This makes it difficult to take any advantage in tracking complete history in one view over single matrix – but running stats on past matrix sets might help identify some patterns). Even/Odd is more constant when compared to Low/High or In/Out.
After you mentioned, I was thinking about whether a bias skew balancer factor is needed to tackle this imbalance in unequal split 5/69 to 35 Odds and 34 Evens. I am just used to seeing the trend in overall Even Odd Movement for the current matrix.
Powerball excel with bias equalizer factor(.05 on either end) : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12TOBf4q_wjrjNA0658URaXj3FffRL7V0/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=112494568569750215099&rtpof=true&sd=true
Odd Even
25:24
Balance factor for 1 draw:
Odd -.5: Even+.5
50 numbers drawn in 10 draws: expected balance in fully balanced ½ split matrix is 25 EVENS and 25 ODDS.
So, for unequal 10 draws bias
My factor for 10 draws in pick 5 when there is a bias : 0.5 * 10 = 0.05
last 10 E bias: for even: add factor
=(K2-L2) + (0.05*(L2-K2))
last 10 O bias: for odd: subtract factor
=L2-K2 - (0.05*(L2-K2))
Days when odd bias was in its peak:
02/14/2018
02/10/2018
09/24/2016
Taking 2/14/2018
Odd bias peak caused by:
Game
Date
Draw
Even Count
Odd Count
Total
Even Balance Count
Odd Balance Count
Total Balance Count
Even To Odd Totals Delta
last 10 even
last 10 odd
last 10 E bias
last 10 O bias
BIAS INDICATOR
Bias as Plottable number
POWERBALL
02/14/2018
37-39-44-46-69 [26]
2
3
5
608
627
1235
-19
16
34
-17.1
17.1
O8.55
-8.55
POWERBALL
02/10/2018
1-13-27-41-59 [20]
0
5
5
606
624
1230
-18
16
34
-17.1
17.1
O8.55
-8.55
POWERBALL
02/07/2018
23-34-35-40-47 [10]
2
3
5
606
619
1225
-13
18
32
-13.3
13.3
O6.65
-6.65
POWERBALL
02/03/2018
15-23-27-48-53 [6]
1
4
5
604
616
1220
-12
19
31
-11.4
11.4
O5.7
-5.70
POWERBALL
01/31/2018
4-7-14-46-59 [22]
3
2
5
603
612
1215
-9
21
29
-7.6
7.6
O3.8
-3.80
POWERBALL
01/27/2018
17-21-26-47-54 [7]
2
3
5
600
610
1210
-10
21
29
-7.6
7.6
O3.8
-3.80
slided down to other side with more hopping of 3-2 and 2-3 and more 2-3(O-E):
Game
Date
Draw
Even Count
Odd Count
Total
Even Balance Count
Odd Balance Count
Total Balance Count
Even To Odd Totals Delta
last 10 even
last 10 odd
last 10 E bias
last 10 O bias
BIAS INDICATOR
Bias as Plottable number
POWERBALL
03/10/2018
43-44-54-61-69 [22]
2
3
5
624
646
1270
-22
20
30
-9.5
9.5
O4.75
-4.75
POWERBALL
03/07/2018
6-13-19-36-51 [18]
2
3
5
622
643
1265
-21
19
31
-11.4
11.4
O5.7
-5.70
POWERBALL
03/03/2018
13-17-25-36-40 [5]
2
3
5
620
640
1260
-20
20
30
-9.5
9.5
O4.75
-4.75
POWERBALL
02/28/2018
12-30-59-65-69 [16]
2
3
5
618
637
1255
-19
20
30
-9.5
9.5
O4.75
-4.75
POWERBALL
02/24/2018
24-25-38-62-63 [6]
3
2
5
616
634
1250
-18
19
31
-11.4
11.4
O5.7
-5.70
POWERBALL
02/21/2018
7-15-31-34-36 [8]
2
3
5
613
632
1245
-19
19
31
-11.4
11.4
O5.7
-5.70
POWERBALL
02/17/2018
13-26-39-44-62 [2]
3
2
5
611
629
1240
-18
17
33
-15.2
15.2
O7.6
-7.60
Fully brought down to no bias with:
Game
Date
Draw
Even Count
Odd Count
Total
Even Balance Count
Odd Balance Count
Total Balance Count
Even To Odd Totals Delta
last 10 even
last 10 odd
last 10 E bias
last 10 O bias
BIAS INDICATOR
Bias as Plottable number
POWERBALL
03/17/2018
22-57-59-60-66 [7]
3
2
5
631
649
1280
-18
25
25
0
0
None
0.00
POWERBALL
03/14/2018
6-12-24-41-68 [9]
4
1
5
628
647
1275
-19
22
28
-5.7
5.7
O2.85
-2.85
Not sure about the 10-count bias.
For even similar days when the bias was even peak value:
06/17/2020
12/06/2017
12/02/2017
11/15/2017
Game
Date
Draw
Even Count
Odd Count
Total
Even Balance Count
Odd Balance Count
Total Balance Count
Even To Odd Totals Delta
last 10 even
last 10 odd
last 10 E bias
last 10 O bias
BIAS INDICATOR
Bias as Plottable number
POWERBALL
07/01/2020
15-28-52-53-63 [18]
2
3
5
1213
1262
2475
-49
25
25
0
0
None
0.00
POWERBALL
06/27/2020
9-36-49-56-62 [8]
3
2
5
1211
1259
2470
-48
27
23
3.8
-3.8
E1.9
1.9
POWERBALL
06/24/2020
15-22-27-33-46 [23]
2
3
5
1208
1257
2465
-49
27
23
3.8
-3.8
E1.9
1.9
POWERBALL
06/20/2020
10-31-41-63-67 [5]
1
4
5
1206
1254
2460
-48
30
20
9.5
-9.5
E4.75
4.75
POWERBALL
06/17/2020
7-10-63-64-68 [10]
3
2
5
1205
1250
2455
-45
33
17
15.2
-15.2
E7.6
7.6
POWERBALL
06/13/2020
2-12-32-50-65 [5]
4
1
5
1202
1248
2450
-46
32
18
13.3
-13.3
E6.65
6.65
POWERBALL
06/10/2020
10-33-41-52-54 [18]
3
2
5
1198
1247
2445
-49
32
18
13.3
-13.3
E6.65
6.65
POWERBALL
06/06/2020
1-17-38-68-69 [18]
2
3
5
1195
1245
2440
-50
31
19
11.4
-11.4
E5.7
5.7
POWERBALL
06/03/2020
1-3-26-41-64 [17]
2
3
5
1193
1242
2435
-49
32
18
13.3
-13.3
E6.65
6.65
POWERBALL
05/30/2020
13-32-41-58-60 [14]
3
2
5
1191
1239
2430
-48
32
18
13.3
-13.3
E6.65
6.65
POWERBALL
05/27/2020
38-58-59-64-68 [21]
4
1
5
1188
1237
2425
-49
29
21
7.6
-7.6
E3.8
3.8
POWERBALL
05/23/2020
2-8-18-21-23 [16]
3
2
5
1184
1236
2420
-52
26
24
1.9
-1.9
E0.95
0.95
POWERBALL
05/20/2020
18-34-40-42-50 [9]
5
0
5
1181
1234
2415
-53
27
23
3.8
-3.8
E1.9
1.9
POWERBALL
05/16/2020
8-12-26-39-42 [11]
4
1
5
1176
1234
2410
-58
25
25
0
0
None
0.00
5/0, 4/1 and some 3/2 on one end favors the peak value. A trap can be set to catch 4/1 or ¼ or 5/1 or 1/5 bias. But it would be for short duration of 5 to 6 draws. And then retract. Total of 7 times the top peak values for each side together happened.
Odd
02/14/2018
02/10/2018
09/24/2016
Even
06/17/2020
12/06/2017
12/02/2017
11/15/2017
Once a year the extreme peak happens(or 4 times in 5 years). There will be some more near extreme identifiers that might also be good candidate. Finders Keepers.
If we can lock that 4-1 and 5-0 then it’s lesser set of numbers to deal with e.g., ½ of the numbers for 5-0 or 0-5. The catch is that the rest of the filters from own software/wheel/paid software/wheel or perfect combination of filters in tools like DMP-MG, TLEX and DMP-HT have to be set correctly to get 3/5, 4/5 or 5/5.
I started filtering my set of combos through DMP-MG. And as RL mentions, the numbers themselves need not be looked at directly till filling slips instead various filters with expected times and average times by probability can be used instead of them. I like DMP-MG, TLEX and DMP-HT as they focus on different characteristics of the same winning combos/all combos from another view.
This is just the Even Odd Bias. We can do In/Out, Low/High. There is no limit to tracking.
Using 2/3 3/2 O/E or E/O gives more combos to filter and deal with and in the game on more days to win. Whereas ¼ 0/5 4/1 5/0 give lesser combos to filter and deal with but keep us out of the game for more days and we are in real play on fewer days. I am more of unstable – I keep switching filters on every draw.
Let me know whether you you have any ideas or suggestions.
Good Luck
-
Quote: Originally posted by thamizhpayan on Oct 9, 2021
Allen
Good one.
Big reply so please take time to read it.
Even Odd is naturally occurring characteristic feature of numbers. I haven't tried to change the balancing by introducing any bias equalization factor in bias tracking or so. There would be slight bias towards odd than even in these cases where we can't divide the matrix into exact halves.
In big games, I tend to see Low/High and In/Out differently as we split them up the way we want and when matrixes change, a number in these groups will switch from Low to High or In to Out vice versa based on where they are in the matrix (middle - where more transitions happen over matrix changes). This makes it difficult to take any advantage in tracking complete history in one view over single matrix – but running stats on past matrix sets might help identify some patterns). Even/Odd is more constant when compared to Low/High or In/Out.
After you mentioned, I was thinking about whether a bias skew balancer factor is needed to tackle this imbalance in unequal split 5/69 to 35 Odds and 34 Evens. I am just used to seeing the trend in overall Even Odd Movement for the current matrix.
Powerball excel with bias equalizer factor(.05 on either end) : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12TOBf4q_wjrjNA0658URaXj3FffRL7V0/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=112494568569750215099&rtpof=true&sd=true
Odd Even
25:24
Balance factor for 1 draw:
Odd -.5: Even+.5
50 numbers drawn in 10 draws: expected balance in fully balanced ½ split matrix is 25 EVENS and 25 ODDS.
So, for unequal 10 draws bias
My factor for 10 draws in pick 5 when there is a bias : 0.5 * 10 = 0.05
last 10 E bias: for even: add factor
=(K2-L2) + (0.05*(L2-K2))
last 10 O bias: for odd: subtract factor
=L2-K2 - (0.05*(L2-K2))
Days when odd bias was in its peak:
02/14/2018
02/10/2018
09/24/2016
Taking 2/14/2018
Odd bias peak caused by:
Game
Date
Draw
Even Count
Odd Count
Total
Even Balance Count
Odd Balance Count
Total Balance Count
Even To Odd Totals Delta
last 10 even
last 10 odd
last 10 E bias
last 10 O bias
BIAS INDICATOR
Bias as Plottable number
POWERBALL
02/14/2018
37-39-44-46-69 [26]
2
3
5
608
627
1235
-19
16
34
-17.1
17.1
O8.55
-8.55
POWERBALL
02/10/2018
1-13-27-41-59 [20]
0
5
5
606
624
1230
-18
16
34
-17.1
17.1
O8.55
-8.55
POWERBALL
02/07/2018
23-34-35-40-47 [10]
2
3
5
606
619
1225
-13
18
32
-13.3
13.3
O6.65
-6.65
POWERBALL
02/03/2018
15-23-27-48-53 [6]
1
4
5
604
616
1220
-12
19
31
-11.4
11.4
O5.7
-5.70
POWERBALL
01/31/2018
4-7-14-46-59 [22]
3
2
5
603
612
1215
-9
21
29
-7.6
7.6
O3.8
-3.80
POWERBALL
01/27/2018
17-21-26-47-54 [7]
2
3
5
600
610
1210
-10
21
29
-7.6
7.6
O3.8
-3.80
slided down to other side with more hopping of 3-2 and 2-3 and more 2-3(O-E):
Game
Date
Draw
Even Count
Odd Count
Total
Even Balance Count
Odd Balance Count
Total Balance Count
Even To Odd Totals Delta
last 10 even
last 10 odd
last 10 E bias
last 10 O bias
BIAS INDICATOR
Bias as Plottable number
POWERBALL
03/10/2018
43-44-54-61-69 [22]
2
3
5
624
646
1270
-22
20
30
-9.5
9.5
O4.75
-4.75
POWERBALL
03/07/2018
6-13-19-36-51 [18]
2
3
5
622
643
1265
-21
19
31
-11.4
11.4
O5.7
-5.70
POWERBALL
03/03/2018
13-17-25-36-40 [5]
2
3
5
620
640
1260
-20
20
30
-9.5
9.5
O4.75
-4.75
POWERBALL
02/28/2018
12-30-59-65-69 [16]
2
3
5
618
637
1255
-19
20
30
-9.5
9.5
O4.75
-4.75
POWERBALL
02/24/2018
24-25-38-62-63 [6]
3
2
5
616
634
1250
-18
19
31
-11.4
11.4
O5.7
-5.70
POWERBALL
02/21/2018
7-15-31-34-36 [8]
2
3
5
613
632
1245
-19
19
31
-11.4
11.4
O5.7
-5.70
POWERBALL
02/17/2018
13-26-39-44-62 [2]
3
2
5
611
629
1240
-18
17
33
-15.2
15.2
O7.6
-7.60
Fully brought down to no bias with:
Game
Date
Draw
Even Count
Odd Count
Total
Even Balance Count
Odd Balance Count
Total Balance Count
Even To Odd Totals Delta
last 10 even
last 10 odd
last 10 E bias
last 10 O bias
BIAS INDICATOR
Bias as Plottable number
POWERBALL
03/17/2018
22-57-59-60-66 [7]
3
2
5
631
649
1280
-18
25
25
0
0
None
0.00
POWERBALL
03/14/2018
6-12-24-41-68 [9]
4
1
5
628
647
1275
-19
22
28
-5.7
5.7
O2.85
-2.85
Not sure about the 10-count bias.
For even similar days when the bias was even peak value:
06/17/2020
12/06/2017
12/02/2017
11/15/2017
Game
Date
Draw
Even Count
Odd Count
Total
Even Balance Count
Odd Balance Count
Total Balance Count
Even To Odd Totals Delta
last 10 even
last 10 odd
last 10 E bias
last 10 O bias
BIAS INDICATOR
Bias as Plottable number
POWERBALL
07/01/2020
15-28-52-53-63 [18]
2
3
5
1213
1262
2475
-49
25
25
0
0
None
0.00
POWERBALL
06/27/2020
9-36-49-56-62 [8]
3
2
5
1211
1259
2470
-48
27
23
3.8
-3.8
E1.9
1.9
POWERBALL
06/24/2020
15-22-27-33-46 [23]
2
3
5
1208
1257
2465
-49
27
23
3.8
-3.8
E1.9
1.9
POWERBALL
06/20/2020
10-31-41-63-67 [5]
1
4
5
1206
1254
2460
-48
30
20
9.5
-9.5
E4.75
4.75
POWERBALL
06/17/2020
7-10-63-64-68 [10]
3
2
5
1205
1250
2455
-45
33
17
15.2
-15.2
E7.6
7.6
POWERBALL
06/13/2020
2-12-32-50-65 [5]
4
1
5
1202
1248
2450
-46
32
18
13.3
-13.3
E6.65
6.65
POWERBALL
06/10/2020
10-33-41-52-54 [18]
3
2
5
1198
1247
2445
-49
32
18
13.3
-13.3
E6.65
6.65
POWERBALL
06/06/2020
1-17-38-68-69 [18]
2
3
5
1195
1245
2440
-50
31
19
11.4
-11.4
E5.7
5.7
POWERBALL
06/03/2020
1-3-26-41-64 [17]
2
3
5
1193
1242
2435
-49
32
18
13.3
-13.3
E6.65
6.65
POWERBALL
05/30/2020
13-32-41-58-60 [14]
3
2
5
1191
1239
2430
-48
32
18
13.3
-13.3
E6.65
6.65
POWERBALL
05/27/2020
38-58-59-64-68 [21]
4
1
5
1188
1237
2425
-49
29
21
7.6
-7.6
E3.8
3.8
POWERBALL
05/23/2020
2-8-18-21-23 [16]
3
2
5
1184
1236
2420
-52
26
24
1.9
-1.9
E0.95
0.95
POWERBALL
05/20/2020
18-34-40-42-50 [9]
5
0
5
1181
1234
2415
-53
27
23
3.8
-3.8
E1.9
1.9
POWERBALL
05/16/2020
8-12-26-39-42 [11]
4
1
5
1176
1234
2410
-58
25
25
0
0
None
0.00
5/0, 4/1 and some 3/2 on one end favors the peak value. A trap can be set to catch 4/1 or ¼ or 5/1 or 1/5 bias. But it would be for short duration of 5 to 6 draws. And then retract. Total of 7 times the top peak values for each side together happened.
Odd
02/14/2018
02/10/2018
09/24/2016
Even
06/17/2020
12/06/2017
12/02/2017
11/15/2017
Once a year the extreme peak happens(or 4 times in 5 years). There will be some more near extreme identifiers that might also be good candidate. Finders Keepers.
If we can lock that 4-1 and 5-0 then it’s lesser set of numbers to deal with e.g., ½ of the numbers for 5-0 or 0-5. The catch is that the rest of the filters from own software/wheel/paid software/wheel or perfect combination of filters in tools like DMP-MG, TLEX and DMP-HT have to be set correctly to get 3/5, 4/5 or 5/5.
I started filtering my set of combos through DMP-MG. And as RL mentions, the numbers themselves need not be looked at directly till filling slips instead various filters with expected times and average times by probability can be used instead of them. I like DMP-MG, TLEX and DMP-HT as they focus on different characteristics of the same winning combos/all combos from another view.
This is just the Even Odd Bias. We can do In/Out, Low/High. There is no limit to tracking.
Using 2/3 3/2 O/E or E/O gives more combos to filter and deal with and in the game on more days to win. Whereas ¼ 0/5 4/1 5/0 give lesser combos to filter and deal with but keep us out of the game for more days and we are in real play on fewer days. I am more of unstable – I keep switching filters on every draw.
Let me know whether you you have any ideas or suggestions.
Good Luck
It Seems logical to me to multiply the Even Count by 1.05 to "Level the Field"
Despite doing this there still is Bias to a larger Odd Count than Even.
I Track 5/39 Games (currently maintaining California and Ohio)
Tracking Total Game Counts. Also doing a 365 Count and setting up formulas to do lesser counts like 10 or maybe 39 Draws.
I am getting the feeling that this might be a Rabbit Hole so I flipped on my headlamp and I will slide on down to have a Look.
Your Bias Indicators Values in the Right 2 Columns are 1/2 of Bias Counts. Why?
Back to the Tunnels.
Remember the episode of Star Trek where Frank Gorshin played 2 different characters? One had the right side of his face Black and the Left side was White. The other Character was the Exact Opposite. I was "born" in the OE Clan. We are the exact opposite of your EO Clan. We say minus when you say plus.
-
Quote: Originally posted by AllenB on Oct 9, 2021
It Seems logical to me to multiply the Even Count by 1.05 to "Level the Field"
Despite doing this there still is Bias to a larger Odd Count than Even.
I Track 5/39 Games (currently maintaining California and Ohio)
Tracking Total Game Counts. Also doing a 365 Count and setting up formulas to do lesser counts like 10 or maybe 39 Draws.
I am getting the feeling that this might be a Rabbit Hole so I flipped on my headlamp and I will slide on down to have a Look.
Your Bias Indicators Values in the Right 2 Columns are 1/2 of Bias Counts. Why?
Back to the Tunnels.
Remember the episode of Star Trek where Frank Gorshin played 2 different characters? One had the right side of his face Black and the Left side was White. The other Character was the Exact Opposite. I was "born" in the OE Clan. We are the exact opposite of your EO Clan. We say minus when you say plus.
Hi AllenB,
For me, last 10 E bias and last 10 O bias are how much space of odd that even took over from the total 25 spaces and vice versa. I derived the bias indicator off of OP(JeetKuneDoLotto)’s SLAG (Smart Luck Advantage Gold) value(almost) – It looks like in-order to reach the evenness (not even/odd even but the ½ balance), how far we have to slide odd or even to the other side.
So, far -13.3 Odd bias, I have to drag the balance stick (like a FM radio knob/slider) -6.65 to bring it to the center. This is because the columns show how far away, they are from each other – not center (last 10 E bias and last 10 O bias).
Remember I didn’t add the 1 odd difference factor to last 10 even and last 10 odd, rather I took it from last 10 E bias and last 10 O bias.
I think 20,30,40 draws might be good periods to go after.
I am stuck between two tools/languages – Java to produce excel output and then few excel manipulations with formulae.
Good Luck
-
That comes out to approximately 324,640 possible combinations in the last 15 games if all the numbers were with no repeating digits. It does vary from draw to draw so the possible combinations are less, this is where G Howards methods come in.
-
Quote: Originally posted by lottologix on Oct 9, 2021
That comes out to approximately 324,640 possible combinations in the last 15 games if all the numbers were with no repeating digits. It does vary from draw to draw so the possible combinations are less, this is where G Howards methods come in.
No last digit repetition?
And wheel all numbers from last 15 games and filter out every combo that has at least one lat digit repeat?
Is this how you arrive at 324,640 combos?
-
No looking at my backtest I see that with repeating digits in the last 15 games it usually comes out around 35 numbers in a 69 number game only counting each repeating digit once this is where i get the approximate 324,640 number from. It is not written in stone the game constantly fluctuates. Also I noticed that some of the numbers that show up in the next draw only came out once in the last 15 games. So if I were to try to pick out numbers to play in the next game I would use Gail Howard's tools looking at sums and other indicators that not just all of the numbers in a set from the last 15 games but try to find those number sets that came out only once in the last 15 games. However keep in mind you dont just play only numbers that came out once in the last 15 games but look for balanced number sets from all the digits in the last 15 games that include numbers that only came out once.
-
Quote: Originally posted by thamizhpayan on Oct 8, 2021
The fraction indicators occur up until We get to 10 draws from the very first draw. After the 10 draws are available there won't be fractions.
Advantage Gold may be slightly different from this bias table. I haven't read the book nor do I have the software. This is how I see the E/O bias.
Good Luck
Thanks for the replies Mr. Thamiz. I only looked at PB so far in the google docs. I have to look at your updated stuff later.
I dont use sheetz. I have office 365. (Which I am a little upset about since Bill Gates probably eats babies with Marina Abramovich)
That ok, they are probably just Haitian babies. The worser part is that Google probably raises the babies in D.U.M.B.'s under the Mother of Darkness Castle in Belgium...but going off topic....
I suppose I will focus on NY and FL, as I dont play PB yet. I am waiting for them to raise the cost to five dollars a game, 6 with power play. Then I will be really interested in it!!!
The only thing that would get me more interested in PB would be if when the JP reached the 1 BILLION DOLLAR mark, they replaced the money with some of that Hunter Biden Cocaine and Hooker inspired artwork, I would buy 1000 thousand lines for shizzle my nizzle!!!
(Sorry going off topic again.)
With SLAG, I can import to Notepad and then paste in excel.
Here is what it looks like for Florida.
You can see that the odds and even bias would have to be parsed into different columns and I would have to make one of them negative to separate the Bias column values.
I may try it to see how the long term trend looks when I get some more free time.
Now my "ghetto" bias math method currently in excel is just to take the sum odds in the last ten games and subtract the sum even in the last ten games.
I guess its not the "purist" form of math/trend analysis, but I do see that you can get some major extremes and also a general trend over time.
I just made this today, and it is approx last 720 draws, which is approx last TWO YEARS.
Does this help? I dont know. Its very hard to get a birds eye view on the trends on this little computer screen.
I dont know if I labeled this graph correctly.
It is the sum of odds in the last ten games minus sum of evens in last ten games.
[ΣOddslast10 - ΣEvenslast10 ]
So the 30 is the max bias towards the Odds side, and the negative 20 is the max bias towards the evens side.
And this is assuming my math is correct, as I did not double check my work.
Teacher Help!!!
Is it even correct to call that a "BIAS"? Well obviously it is not a BIAS as defined in SLAG, is their a more correct "mathematical term" for bias?
IMHO, this graph would be best utilized when cross-referencing with the DSH.
-
Quote: Originally posted by JeetKuneDoLotto on Oct 9, 2021
Thanks for the replies Mr. Thamiz. I only looked at PB so far in the google docs. I have to look at your updated stuff later.
I dont use sheetz. I have office 365. (Which I am a little upset about since Bill Gates probably eats babies with Marina Abramovich)
That ok, they are probably just Haitian babies. The worser part is that Google probably raises the babies in D.U.M.B.'s under the Mother of Darkness Castle in Belgium...but going off topic....
I suppose I will focus on NY and FL, as I dont play PB yet. I am waiting for them to raise the cost to five dollars a game, 6 with power play. Then I will be really interested in it!!!
The only thing that would get me more interested in PB would be if when the JP reached the 1 BILLION DOLLAR mark, they replaced the money with some of that Hunter Biden Cocaine and Hooker inspired artwork, I would buy 1000 thousand lines for shizzle my nizzle!!!
(Sorry going off topic again.)
With SLAG, I can import to Notepad and then paste in excel.
Here is what it looks like for Florida.
You can see that the odds and even bias would have to be parsed into different columns and I would have to make one of them negative to separate the Bias column values.
I may try it to see how the long term trend looks when I get some more free time.
Now my "ghetto" bias math method currently in excel is just to take the sum odds in the last ten games and subtract the sum even in the last ten games.
I guess its not the "purist" form of math/trend analysis, but I do see that you can get some major extremes and also a general trend over time.
I just made this today, and it is approx last 720 draws, which is approx last TWO YEARS.
Does this help? I dont know. Its very hard to get a birds eye view on the trends on this little computer screen.
I dont know if I labeled this graph correctly.
It is the sum of odds in the last ten games minus sum of evens in last ten games.
[ΣOddslast10 - ΣEvenslast10 ]
So the 30 is the max bias towards the Odds side, and the negative 20 is the max bias towards the evens side.
And this is assuming my math is correct, as I did not double check my work.
Teacher Help!!!
Is it even correct to call that a "BIAS"? Well obviously it is not a BIAS as defined in SLAG, is their a more correct "mathematical term" for bias?
IMHO, this graph would be best utilized when cross-referencing with the DSH.
The right most column in yours is the bias. It's the points that we have to move even or odd's difference.
E.g., 28o22e 28 is 3 ahead of 25 and 22 is 3 behind 25. So odd has +3 bias and even has -3 bias.
What Allen and I added is more of a equalizer factor to balance the 35 odd 34 even inequal split.
Does this make sense?
Good Luck