Talk about "Water and Oil", I had to say that, instead of you know what, so people won't call me racist.
The Eve game is full of "Normal" Target numbers and the Mid game is full of the "Other" numbers, at least on those few draws.
It is almost as if both games were being manipulated, that is "Fixed", I am not saying that they were or are being, only that they look as if they are.
For one thing, look at the so very many doubles on the Midday game and also at the number that repeated straight from last to next draw, this looks as some kind of a backfire due to some kind(s) of excessive undue manipulation, what I mean is that it seems to me that "Normal" random behavior does not produce that kind of draws history, it is very biased.
The Night draws are not "Normal" either, they were and are also biased, but now seem to be in transition, but still biased.
Texas Pick 3 Day Previous Lottery Results
Draw Date Results
Sat, Oct 25, 2008 8-8-5, Sum It Up: 21
Fri, Oct 24, 2008 8-8-5, Sum It Up: 21
Thu, Oct 23, 2008 5-2-5, Sum It Up: 12
Wed, Oct 22, 2008 8-9-6, Sum It Up: 23
Tue, Oct 21, 2008 7-9-3, Sum It Up: 19
Mon, Oct 20, 2008 2-9-0, Sum It Up: 11
Sat, Oct 18, 2008 1-1-7, Sum It Up: 9
Fri, Oct 17, 2008 2-5-4, Sum It Up: 11
Thu, Oct 16, 2008 7-5-5, Sum It Up: 17
Wed, Oct 15, 2008 7-1-0, Sum It Up: 8
------------
Texas Pick 3 Night Previous Lottery Results
Draw Date Results
Sat, Oct 25, 2008 2-0-6, Sum It Up: 8
Fri, Oct 24, 2008 6-1-1, Sum It Up: 8
Thu, Oct 23, 2008 2-6-0, Sum It Up: 8
Wed, Oct 22, 2008 1-7-3, Sum It Up: 11
Tue, Oct 21, 2008 0-5-8, Sum It Up: 13
Mon, Oct 20, 2008 8-3-5, Sum It Up: 16
Sat, Oct 18, 2008 6-1-9, Sum It Up: 16
Fri, Oct 17, 2008 5-1-6, Sum It Up: 12
Thu, Oct 16, 2008 2-7-0, Sum It Up: 9
Wed, Oct 15, 2008 8-1-3, Sum It Up: 12
At this time the Tx lottery seems to be more rotten than the Indiana Lottery is or was.
No wonder that some people don't trust the lotteries nor any gambling.
As always, the past draws tell their tale.
That is why it is so important to study them and not just the last 10 draws, but Months or Years of them, so one can see the changes (movements), things don't stay in a particular way forever.
What to do? Depends on what a much longer history of draws shows.
You can try to use tham as they are and or you can mix both games to homogenize the games-draws some, that is to even-distribute them up some, that is to unbiase them some.
That is the main reason to want to mix games, to unbiase the draws, to distribute the patterns-numbers more evenly, that does not always work and or work as well as we want to, but it will work to some degree.
Prediction is a flex-able relative thing.
While events seem to be connected, they might only be connected by their statistics, that is unless the draws are being "Fixed".
When things are not being "Fixed" events are not connected by anything other than by their statistics.
As one ball, draw or digit, should not have anything to do with another ball, draw or digit, they have to do with each other only thru their stats.
That is why random events can up to some kind of flexable (Flexible) point be statisticaly predicted, if the game is not being fixed in some way to favor the lottery or somebody.
A truly random game is a game that up to a point can be predicted (if you are in the know-how).
Chances are that chances are.
Many will say no, cuz they don't know any better!
-------------
I make a kind of retraction:
A random game can produce draws like those, but would only for some period of draws-time and then the draws would be more normal like, that is that then for some time the patterns would be more evenly mixed, later sometime the 'Bad" draws could again come, but overall for the game the draws-patterns would be more evenly mixed.
If the game overall, that is more often or most of the time, or than what would seem normal seems to be more biased towards some particular patterns, then the game in some way is being unbalanced and might be "fixed" or there might be something wrong with it.
So if this happens, but not too often, it might still be within random normal limits and it would be O.K, otherwise there is something wrong.