i understand.
the point i was attempting to make using the 70/30 as an example is that "example" has been around quite awhile, long enough to be changed by systems users, and yet it remains consistently constant, which only suggests that systems are making ZERO headway.
just so we are clear, i realize the 70/30 is a percentage not only of purchases by whom, but it also a percentage of who wins what.
and that figure never moves.
it is every bit the indicator no one creates an edge, and in fact it qualifies every effort thrown at it, which means it's random
let's be realistic in comparison to the thousands of systems players just at LP, plus the level of lottery "intelligence" that really can't be surpassed outside of LP, and still.....no one moves that percentage.
LP is ground zero for lottery system assault.
most everyone of the people i challenge on their "claims" have me by a long--------------------->shot in the I.Q. race
brilliant mathematical / analytical minds, and yet nothing.
scanned winning tickets, sure. proof of sustained consistentcy screaming repeatability.....nope
doesn't that speak some common sense when we are discussing premises like the "70/30" ? it sure does to people who aren't sold out to wishful thinking
and remember what i said about a system being repeatable if it's 'legit", and duplicated by others?
neither of that happens, and if it doesn't happen after the most brilliant throw their efforts at it daily, then...
take RL for example......what i asked him to do would have taken him thousands of hours.
even RL can't do it after that kind of effort (lol).
you see, i don't mind being on the opposite ends of all this, but make lying statements like the one above made by RL, and expect to get raked over the coals about the "integrity" aspect of what you guys tell people you can do.
it becomes pretty obvious that a person "can't" ........when an obviously intelligent person resorts to that.
unfortunately, in the holding up of my end of the bargain about being a system skeptic, part of my job description is highlighting faux pas like RL's, so others can measure claims vs real ability.
integrity is every bit a part of claimed ability, because only a man that has integrity does what he claims he can do.
if he can't.....he can't be trusted
what "you people" don't realize is i am looking to qualify you.
it isn't my fault when you disqualify yourself
true skeptics arent one sided tainted dweebs. they are ambivalent, and look for the qualification equally, just as much as the info they are slicing open, when it ends up disqualifying itself.
been "looking" for 9 years.
still looking