azares
We probably would have done much better than a couple 3+0 but I am still building trust in group selection
process that I use. I have 15 inputs which are all different. From these 15 sets of choices I make a few cal-
culations based on chance how many each member will most likely get correct. Next I make a series of counts
that I believe will produce the best set based on all the choices made by everyone.
I ran my analysis using all the members inputs and came up with E-F-H-I-J. I would have removed the (J) from
the list so we had all 4 groups. The whole process is still in the testing phase but so far looks very good. I
did not have the confidence to play E-F-H-I and block all the rest so I kind of made a middle or the road setup
for last night. I am still working on the processes which I will use to extract the final setup from the members
selections. Last night it worked perfect but needs more testing. As long as everyone keeps sending in there
choices I will keep working on it. It is very important that everyone sends their selections and once I get the
groups worked out we will move on to the digits. Once we get both worked out we are going to put a really
big dent in mega-millions. Frenchie did the best overall with a 4of4 in 6 but I don't use any one persons picks
more than anothers. The entire process is based on the probability that each person will only get so many
correct. The top two filters suggested by everyone did not do too well but I am focused on the groups at this
time. Step by step we are moving along nicely. Again I don't want any one person to feel bad if they did not
do well in their selections because in the analysis I use, their inputs are as important as a person who hits all
of them. I need both to make this work, a person playing on their own needs to be correct but for the pool it
dosen't work that way.
RL