Poland
Member #86,299
February 2, 2010
1,068 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by meskhov on Jul 20, 2012
RL:
Did you mean T/B not T/G? It seems like T/b hits 3-4 a lot more than T/G which likes the 4-5 spread.
Just wanted to confirm.
Thanks
M
Sorry to butt in, but for sure RL meant TG so groups. TG=3 on average hits every 6 games in your MM and now it's 12 games out. TB=3 is on the other side of the spectrum as it hit recently. That does not mean, of course, that TG=3 will hit and TB=3 will miss. The fact is that selecting TG=3 one immediately slices the number of sets and it does hit every now and then.
MA United States
Member #89,091
March 30, 2010
245 Posts
Offline
Watchout:
Thanks for the reply. Didn't know you were still on paper. I just started playing for real 2 games ago.
Just need a plan of action to consistently keep the lines below 200 or so that Auto Cover an have a chance of reduction with some hits.
I'm glad we were seeing mostly the same things for this game.
Are you doing better with MM or PB? Does one seem easier to work with? I think the values on PB don't move as much as MM. Sometimes the values jump 4 on MM whereas on Pb I see a lot of 1-2 value changes.
Anyway, thanks for the reply and will keep trying!
Georgia United States
Member #129,902
July 1, 2012
513 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by meskhov on Jul 20, 2012
Watchout:
Thanks for the reply. Didn't know you were still on paper. I just started playing for real 2 games ago.
Just need a plan of action to consistently keep the lines below 200 or so that Auto Cover an have a chance of reduction with some hits.
I'm glad we were seeing mostly the same things for this game.
Are you doing better with MM or PB? Does one seem easier to work with? I think the values on PB don't move as much as MM. Sometimes the values jump 4 on MM whereas on Pb I see a lot of 1-2 value changes.
Anyway, thanks for the reply and will keep trying!
M
I was almost embarassed to reply on MM. PB by far seems easyer. It could just be the cycle they are in.
MA United States
Member #89,091
March 30, 2010
245 Posts
Offline
Adam:
Well, I guess we should be glad we got the hard filters correct! Can't believe we missed the other 5 filters though, especially after seeing where they went. I was going to block the decades 20 and 30 but it wouldn't have helped this time. I need to visualize more as you said before, "complete the picture". You are so right as viewing the graph to determine where it will go up or down or neutral. I think I'm going to play 2 versions of filters settings, some that might increase or the other case decrease and see if I an over all the options.
So frustrating to miss that many especially when you see after where they went to!
Poland
Member #86,299
February 2, 2010
1,068 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by meskhov on Jul 20, 2012
Adam:
Well, I guess we should be glad we got the hard filters correct! Can't believe we missed the other 5 filters though, especially after seeing where they went. I was going to block the decades 20 and 30 but it wouldn't have helped this time. I need to visualize more as you said before, "complete the picture". You are so right as viewing the graph to determine where it will go up or down or neutral. I think I'm going to play 2 versions of filters settings, some that might increase or the other case decrease and see if I an over all the options.
So frustrating to miss that many especially when you see after where they went to!
Will try again tommorrow with PB game.
Can you have a look at that one for me?
Thank you!
M
meskhov
It was a very hard draw to predict. I was almost right with UT and TB, but was wrong with group H. I also blocked correct digits. RL was absolutely right with TG=3.
Visualizing the graph can often times give an idea what may happen, though sometimes it can lead us astray. I think that it has much in common with so- called technical analysis of the stock.
That's why it so important to play some filters while leaving others running wild as you have no way of being correct with all the filters, unless you leave them wild open.
Do not worry. You are playing a very tough game and it's very hard to go down with the number of sets and be correct.
Poland
Member #86,299
February 2, 2010
1,068 Posts
Offline
Hi guys,
I've noticed, at least in my game, that for some filters bias search results give pretty often good suggestions as to what might hit. For others it may be highly misleading. I for one would never use bias for picking groups to play or block.
Poland
Member #86,299
February 2, 2010
1,068 Posts
Offline
As to the last MM draw, provided that some good choices were made that was possible using both RSG and RAC on 351 sets. I post it to prove how powerful RAC and RSG may be on much more than 100-200 sets. So do not force yourself into using some more filters or tightening the ones already set as even with a bit more sets after the RFW you can still hit nicely.
Poland
Member #86,299
February 2, 2010
1,068 Posts
Offline
Hi guys,
I think if I were in your place, I'd try and focus on one game only. Perhaps looking at both but only to find out where I make better choices and am more likely to take right decisions. Every game is a bit or more than a bit different and you may find yourselves better suited for one of them. That would also cut down the cost of play which at the end of the day is important. There's no fun playing lottery without hitting a prize once in a while.