Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited January 16, 2017, 11:54 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

RL's Digit Master Pro Big Game software download.

Topic closed. 2092 replies. Last post 3 years ago by sandnan.

Page 36 of 140
4.820
PrintE-mailLink
Avatar
Krakow
Poland
Member #86302
February 2, 2010
892 Posts
Offline
Posted: July 18, 2012, 4:56 pm - IP Logged

Adam:

I forgot to ask what were your auto cover settings for this run?

Thanks

M

I'm using 3,6,25,30

meskhov

That's a very important and relevant question. I think that the default values set by RL for this game are the best i.e.:

1

5

25

30

 

Adam

    Avatar
    MA
    United States
    Member #89094
    March 30, 2010
    245 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: July 18, 2012, 4:57 pm - IP Logged

    Adam:

    Thanks for the reply.

    Yes, I'll try those out.

    Reagards

    M

      watch out's avatar - behold
      Georgia
      United States
      Member #129908
      July 1, 2012
      207 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: July 18, 2012, 5:55 pm - IP Logged

      Adam

       

      Whoa that's heavy....I can't today as I have already got tonights game set. I have also got MM Fri nights game set, but tonight after the game I will do more testing on how I use the RLP wheel.

      I will get back in a couple days on this. 

      Thank you

      Just do it......

        Avatar
        Krakow
        Poland
        Member #86302
        February 2, 2010
        892 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: July 18, 2012, 6:07 pm - IP Logged

        Adam

         

        Whoa that's heavy....I can't today as I have already got tonights game set. I have also got MM Fri nights game set, but tonight after the game I will do more testing on how I use the RLP wheel.

        I will get back in a couple days on this. 

        Thank you

        watch out,

        Of course, no need to hurry. However I think it should be done.

         

        Adam

          RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

          United States
          Member #59354
          March 13, 2008
          4052 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: July 18, 2012, 9:58 pm - IP Logged

          Adam

          When using RLP you can R-click to test the current draw.  When you R-click it skips the top

          set in the database and starts with the second line.  This way you don't have to remove

          a set to backtest,  R-Click simulates removing the top set.  The way you describe above will

          also work, the only difference between the two methods is that you don't have to remove the

          set before you run then update it before you check.  Note! just make sure you click the correct

          option, it's easy to get them mixed up.

          RL

          Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

          I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

          they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

          USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

            US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

            watch out's avatar - behold
            Georgia
            United States
            Member #129908
            July 1, 2012
            207 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: July 19, 2012, 1:35 am - IP Logged

            Adam

            Here's the results of my first RLP test and I will go into detail how I ran the test.  Please feel free to correct me in my error.

            First I took last night's PB game. I corrected my predicted errors and corrected the right filters fit that game. I then removed all games until 7-4-12 then ran the same filters. This would be the same had if I predicted them correctly before the game.

            1ST test

            I ran the RFW and got 69 lines

            I then ran the RLP and got 16 lines

            Then I updated the games to 7-18-12

            The 69 RFW lines produced

            one 5

            The 16 LRP lines produced

            One 5

            I then right clicked LRP  and got

            One 5

            Second test removing games to 7-4-12

            RFW 267 Lines produced then I updated to 7-18-12 to test

            one 5

            three 4's

            17 3's

            The RLP produced 36 lines

            one 5

            two 4's

            four 3's

            Right clicked RLP

            One 5

            two 4's

            four 3"S

            Third test

            RFW produced 641 lines then updated to 7-18-12

            one 5

            steven 4's

            39 3's

            The RLP produced 75 lines

            one 5

            two 4's

            five 3's

            Right clicked RLP

            one 5

            two 4's

            five 3's

            In summary I took 7-18-12 filters and then removed games back to 7-4-12 then ran filters. Then I checked the files after updating games back to 7-18-12.

             

            Your input will be greatly appreciated and I will wait until after your review before further testing.

            Just do it......

              Avatar
              Krakow
              Poland
              Member #86302
              February 2, 2010
              892 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: July 19, 2012, 3:05 am - IP Logged

              Adam

              When using RLP you can R-click to test the current draw.  When you R-click it skips the top

              set in the database and starts with the second line.  This way you don't have to remove

              a set to backtest,  R-Click simulates removing the top set.  The way you describe above will

              also work, the only difference between the two methods is that you don't have to remove the

              set before you run then update it before you check.  Note! just make sure you click the correct

              option, it's easy to get them mixed up.

              RL

              RL

               

              Thanks. That's how I started backtesting. However the problem I've found is that doing this way I didn't get the same results always. Meaning the number of sets sometimes differed. Thus to play safe I sort of traveled back in time and removed the last draw.

               

              Adam

                Avatar
                Krakow
                Poland
                Member #86302
                February 2, 2010
                892 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: July 19, 2012, 3:17 am - IP Logged

                Adam

                Here's the results of my first RLP test and I will go into detail how I ran the test.  Please feel free to correct me in my error.

                First I took last night's PB game. I corrected my predicted errors and corrected the right filters fit that game. I then removed all games until 7-4-12 then ran the same filters. This would be the same had if I predicted them correctly before the game.

                1ST test

                I ran the RFW and got 69 lines

                I then ran the RLP and got 16 lines

                Then I updated the games to 7-18-12

                The 69 RFW lines produced

                one 5

                The 16 LRP lines produced

                One 5

                I then right clicked LRP  and got

                One 5

                Second test removing games to 7-4-12

                RFW 267 Lines produced then I updated to 7-18-12 to test

                one 5

                three 4's

                17 3's

                The RLP produced 36 lines

                one 5

                two 4's

                four 3's

                Right clicked RLP

                One 5

                two 4's

                four 3"S

                Third test

                RFW produced 641 lines then updated to 7-18-12

                one 5

                steven 4's

                39 3's

                The RLP produced 75 lines

                one 5

                two 4's

                five 3's

                Right clicked RLP

                one 5

                two 4's

                five 3's

                In summary I took 7-18-12 filters and then removed games back to 7-4-12 then ran filters. Then I checked the files after updating games back to 7-18-12.

                 

                Your input will be greatly appreciated and I will wait until after your review before further testing.

                watch out,

                Looking forward to hearing how you went about testing the RLP.

                 

                Adam

                  Avatar
                  Krakow
                  Poland
                  Member #86302
                  February 2, 2010
                  892 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: July 19, 2012, 3:33 am - IP Logged

                  watch out,

                  Sorry to disappoint you but there's no way you could've gotten a 5 of 5 using RLP for the last draw. Unfiltered sets do not hold it, hence filtered cannot have it either. Probably what you did was left-clicking and not right-clicking on RLP. That makes a world of difference in results. Only 9 x 4 of 5 was there in unfiltered sets.PB

                  Adam

                    RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

                    United States
                    Member #59354
                    March 13, 2008
                    4052 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: July 19, 2012, 5:12 am - IP Logged

                    RL

                     

                    Thanks. That's how I started backtesting. However the problem I've found is that doing this way I didn't get the same results always. Meaning the number of sets sometimes differed. Thus to play safe I sort of traveled back in time and removed the last draw.

                     

                    Adam

                    Adam

                    If the exact same sets are not produced using the two methods then I would expect that a bug exist.

                    The RLP option is undergoing a major overhall but it's taking longer than expected to work out the new

                    algorithms for the reduction process.  Once it's finished I will be puttting the update up for download. 

                    RL

                    Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

                    I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

                    they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

                    USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

                      US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

                      Avatar
                      Krakow
                      Poland
                      Member #86302
                      February 2, 2010
                      892 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: July 19, 2012, 6:04 am - IP Logged

                      Adam

                      If the exact same sets are not produced using the two methods then I would expect that a bug exist.

                      The RLP option is undergoing a major overhall but it's taking longer than expected to work out the new

                      algorithms for the reduction process.  Once it's finished I will be puttting the update up for download. 

                      RL

                      RL

                       

                      Thanks a lot. It crossed my mind that it could be a bug. You mentioned a couple of times that the RLP is work in progress so it's understandable that it could be the case. I just wanted to remind people of it and make them do not jump to nice conclusions too fast.

                      Perhaps expectations have been set too high in that respect. If a formula reduces the number of sets to 1-5% of combinations in the game, it's hard to expect that it will hit as often as desired. One would rationally expect it to hit not more than 10% of the time and that would be great.

                       

                      Adam

                        Avatar
                        MA
                        United States
                        Member #89094
                        March 30, 2010
                        245 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: July 19, 2012, 8:32 am - IP Logged

                        Adam:

                        I tried using suggest last night on the PB game and I opened up some filters as you suggested in the mm draw but got too many sets even blocking 2 groups.  Should I have continued to block some filters or digits to get the lines down?

                        Thanks for your help.

                        M

                          Avatar
                          Krakow
                          Poland
                          Member #86302
                          February 2, 2010
                          892 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: July 19, 2012, 8:42 am - IP Logged

                          Adam:

                          I tried using suggest last night on the PB game and I opened up some filters as you suggested in the mm draw but got too many sets even blocking 2 groups.  Should I have continued to block some filters or digits to get the lines down?

                          Thanks for your help.

                          M

                          meskhov,

                          As you already picked 2 groups to block which is good for a start, I'd think of blocking or putting 1 digit in play. Try to look at those least and  most active ones in the last draws. Perhaps checking F4 might also help.  Digit 0 looks a bit like hitting, though of course I cannot be 100% sure.

                           

                          Adam

                            Avatar
                            Krakow
                            Poland
                            Member #86302
                            February 2, 2010
                            892 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: July 19, 2012, 8:51 am - IP Logged

                            Also GM looks like a very strong value of 1, whereas I'd have doubts as to DM skipping the value of 0.

                             

                            Adam

                              Avatar
                              Krakow
                              Poland
                              Member #86302
                              February 2, 2010
                              892 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: July 19, 2012, 10:22 am - IP Logged

                              meskhov,

                               

                              What you might also do is setting one or two of the ranged filters to one value. Given you were doing so good with them it might even give you a better chance. Probably it would bring the sets down to ar. 200 which is good for RAC.

                               

                              Adam

                                 
                                Page 36 of 140