Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 3, 2016, 6:31 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

RL's Digit Master Pro Big Game software download.

Topic closed. 2092 replies. Last post 3 years ago by sandnan.

Page 62 of 140
4.820
PrintE-mailLink

United States
Member #97695
September 21, 2010
358 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 1, 2012, 12:43 am - IP Logged

Boy, skunked again on a few filters!  I had as I said earlier I went with blocking 6, had 7=01 , 9 was 11 and cd=01.

I missed the md filter as I had 2-3 and it went to 5 naturally.  I also missed on the 1's had only a high of 2 instead of 3.  I had A to P and gr b to B as orignally thought.  I think I will run the TB and Md wide open as these 2 always seem to get me as they jump around so much. I did have 50's at 00.

Definitely getting better just need to adjust some ranges on the unstable filters so I don't keep missing them.

Will keep trying and try again tomorrow with PB see if we can get a plan together.

Thanks Guys.

M

Lost $5.00 I need to play on paper.

    adulane62's avatar - file php?avatar=16228.gif
    From Denver, Rocky Mountain Empire,
    United States
    Member #49750
    February 13, 2007
    439 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: August 1, 2012, 12:47 am - IP Logged

    RL,

    I have a different idea, if possible ?

    When all the filters are set up and ready to go, then when you click on the tab " R-F-W " to get the combinations sets, at this moment, if some filters are set

    wrong, they would come up in a red color for example ? then we know they would need to be readjusted.

    Would it be hard to write a code for this one ?

    I'm not a programmer, so I wouldn't know.

    Thank you.

    Serge.

    Frenchie, Your suggestions will help a lot. Most of the time after I run RFW I get a result of 0 as in nada, zero! I am absolutely sure some of the filters and digits are conflicting with each other and I am having a hard time which filter goes with which groups or digits, etc... Your suggested idea might improve the problem! I ALWAYS use #"s 36 & 48 for wheeling and I also use # 36 for mega ball exclusively. Unfortunately for me this two numbers have let me down for quite a while now. But being the stubborn person I am, I have stuck with it! Oh, well...

      Avatar
      New Member
      Nairobi
      Kenya
      Member #93075
      June 21, 2010
      16 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: August 1, 2012, 12:59 am - IP Logged

      Hello,

      I have not read everything on this thread and may be somebody has already asked the question.

      Using ID filter how do you filter the following combinations which have all the digits from 0 to 9 i.e 10 independent digits?

      10 27 38 49 56 
      10 27 39 48 56 
      10 28 37 49 56 
      10 28 39 47 56 
      10 29 37 48 56 
      10 29 38 47 56 
      16 27 38 49 50 
      16 27 39 48 50 
      16 28 37 49 50 
      16 28 39 47 50 
      16 29 37 48 50 
      16 29 38 47 50 
      17 20 38 49 56 
      17 20 39 48 56 
      17 26 38 49 50 
      17 26 39 48 50 
      17 28 30 49 56 
      17 28 36 49 50 
      17 28 39 40 56 
      17 28 39 46 50 
      17 29 30 48 56 
      17 29 36 48 50 
      17 29 38 40 56 
      17 29 38 46 50 
      18 20 37 49 56 
      18 20 39 47 56 
      18 26 37 49 50 
      18 26 39 47 50 
      18 27 30 49 56 
      18 27 36 49 50 
      18 27 39 40 56 
      18 27 39 46 50 
      18 29 30 47 56 
      18 29 36 47 50 
      18 29 37 40 56 
      18 29 37 46 50 
      19 20 37 48 56 
      19 20 38 47 56 
      19 26 37 48 50 
      19 26 38 47 50 
      19 27 30 48 56 
      19 27 36 48 50 
      19 27 38 40 56 
      19 27 38 46 50 
      19 28 30 47 56 
      19 28 36 47 50 
      19 28 37 40 56 
      19 28 37 46 50

       

      Regards

      Kenya649


        United States
        Member #97695
        September 21, 2010
        358 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: August 1, 2012, 1:04 am - IP Logged

        RL,

        I am learning I set the filters too close, many of them I got correct, but their was a choice say between 0 and 2, and some I know for a certain.

        So next time when I have two conflicting choices, I will play them both.

        Will send up the sets, but RAC should handle it. I need to be patient, and play on paper and learn until I start hitting them.

        I am going to study my results, and start gearing up for Thursday.

        Should do better than today.

        I am surprised I did not get the bonus ball.  I suspect they changed the ball sets for this draw.

          jimjwright's avatar - Yellow 3.png
          Park City, UT
          United States
          Member #69864
          January 18, 2009
          993 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: August 1, 2012, 1:16 am - IP Logged

          Hello,

          I have not read everything on this thread and may be somebody has already asked the question.

          Using ID filter how do you filter the following combinations which have all the digits from 0 to 9 i.e 10 independent digits?

          10 27 38 49 56 
          10 27 39 48 56 
          10 28 37 49 56 
          10 28 39 47 56 
          10 29 37 48 56 
          10 29 38 47 56 
          16 27 38 49 50 
          16 27 39 48 50 
          16 28 37 49 50 
          16 28 39 47 50 
          16 29 37 48 50 
          16 29 38 47 50 
          17 20 38 49 56 
          17 20 39 48 56 
          17 26 38 49 50 
          17 26 39 48 50 
          17 28 30 49 56 
          17 28 36 49 50 
          17 28 39 40 56 
          17 28 39 46 50 
          17 29 30 48 56 
          17 29 36 48 50 
          17 29 38 40 56 
          17 29 38 46 50 
          18 20 37 49 56 
          18 20 39 47 56 
          18 26 37 49 50 
          18 26 39 47 50 
          18 27 30 49 56 
          18 27 36 49 50 
          18 27 39 40 56 
          18 27 39 46 50 
          18 29 30 47 56 
          18 29 36 47 50 
          18 29 37 40 56 
          18 29 37 46 50 
          19 20 37 48 56 
          19 20 38 47 56 
          19 26 37 48 50 
          19 26 38 47 50 
          19 27 30 48 56 
          19 27 36 48 50 
          19 27 38 40 56 
          19 27 38 46 50 
          19 28 30 47 56 
          19 28 36 47 50 
          19 28 37 40 56 
          19 28 37 46 50

           

          Regards

          Kenya649

          Is this a trick question?  Just set all the digits to 1/1 as follows:

           

           

          Jimmy

            frenchie's avatar - Lottery-041.jpg
            Los Angeles
            United States
            Member #75410
            June 2, 2009
            479 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: August 1, 2012, 1:22 am - IP Logged

            Frenchie, Your suggestions will help a lot. Most of the time after I run RFW I get a result of 0 as in nada, zero! I am absolutely sure some of the filters and digits are conflicting with each other and I am having a hard time which filter goes with which groups or digits, etc... Your suggested idea might improve the problem! I ALWAYS use #"s 36 & 48 for wheeling and I also use # 36 for mega ball exclusively. Unfortunately for me this two numbers have let me down for quite a while now. But being the stubborn person I am, I have stuck with it! Oh, well...

            adulane,

            That is what happen to me too, I get a 0 return also, and that make me go back and redue everything untill I get some combinations in return, why do you think,

            I ask to create this list is for all of us to get better result and not get frustrated when that happen, so I'm trying to ignite the process but it doesn't take off quick

            this list must be done in one way or another, I'm trying on my side to work on it but I'm slow because I'm not familiar enough with the system it takes longer.

            Frenchie.

              frenchie's avatar - Lottery-041.jpg
              Los Angeles
              United States
              Member #75410
              June 2, 2009
              479 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: August 1, 2012, 2:06 am - IP Logged

              I think we should separate the task between who is willing to do some of it.

              I already post a link of a table that I made on excel about those filters series for a personnel purpose but I'm gone post it again.

              What I did is that, I numbered each RL's Filters from 1 to 57 in the order they show in his software ( The filters that have multiple

              selections are separated per each value ).I set up this table for myself to have a better look for the selection of the filters that have

              a list of numbers, which are named in column A and B. Now maybe some of you can download it and make it better ? let see what happen ?

              https://www.box.com/s/40e7ad830052eee84f4e


              here below a picture for the one that don't have excel.

               

              I know it look a bit confusing but this is RL's filters that have a list of numbers, and I hope that might help in some way ?

              Frenchie.

                RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

                United States
                Member #59354
                March 13, 2008
                3962 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: August 1, 2012, 2:12 am - IP Logged

                kenya649

                For any filter who's value can show above 9 it is covered by setting the upper value to 9.   

                Setting ID=9 covers 9 and up or in this instance 10.   JW answer is correct if you want to

                pick only sets with 10 ID's but the upper value of ID must be set to 9.  TB follows the same

                rule 11-12-13-21-23 has 10 TB's but is covered when the TB's upper value is set to 9.

                The database also list any value 9 and up as 9.    When the program was first written it was

                for a 5-39 matrix which cannot have 10 ID's.  I should have changed these values to reflect 

                double digit values but decided using 9 as 9 and up works just as well, as only a few sets

                fall within this range.

                RL

                Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

                I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

                they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

                USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

                  US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

                  frenchie's avatar - Lottery-041.jpg
                  Los Angeles
                  United States
                  Member #75410
                  June 2, 2009
                  479 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: August 1, 2012, 2:24 am - IP Logged

                  For example if you look at filters 4,5 and 6 none of the numbers are in commun each filter  have it's list and no numbers are found in the other ones

                  DO have 12 numbers,

                  DE have 14 numbers,

                  MD have 28 numbers,

                  so we can see from this list than MD would have a higher min. and max than the other one, which maybe can lock a min. 1 and it would be more risky

                  to do that with DO and DE ?   If you look at a number from which ever filter looking in that same column could triger you to adjust the filters below ?

                  Those are just example I'm not sure if every one would folow, but to me I see better with this file.

                  Frenchie.

                    frenchie's avatar - Lottery-041.jpg
                    Los Angeles
                    United States
                    Member #75410
                    June 2, 2009
                    479 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: August 1, 2012, 2:56 am - IP Logged

                    Sorry there is a small mistake in the excel file, in filter DO type the number : 55 and in filter MD type the number : 16 they will change color.Sorry about that !

                      RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

                      United States
                      Member #59354
                      March 13, 2008
                      3962 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: August 1, 2012, 2:59 am - IP Logged

                      Frenchie, Your suggestions will help a lot. Most of the time after I run RFW I get a result of 0 as in nada, zero! I am absolutely sure some of the filters and digits are conflicting with each other and I am having a hard time which filter goes with which groups or digits, etc... Your suggested idea might improve the problem! I ALWAYS use #"s 36 & 48 for wheeling and I also use # 36 for mega ball exclusively. Unfortunately for me this two numbers have let me down for quite a while now. But being the stubborn person I am, I have stuck with it! Oh, well...

                      Hi Guys

                      There are millions of ways to set the filters which will return zero sets.  The task of adding the ability

                      to find/show a conflict before the run process would be very hard to code for the following reasons.

                      Lets say that you have DO set to 2/2 and  and DE set to 2/2 and MD set to 2/3.  The code would say

                      that all 3 values need to be changed while any one of them could be adjusted to make the other 2 work.

                      The bigger problem would be if these settings caused a bunch of other filters to also conflict, You might

                      end up with 15 values showing a problem all based on one of the 3 above meaning that you would need

                      to sort through them all looking for the problem.   To automate the process to tell you which filter or filters

                      need to be changed, well, I think it would be easier to build a program to pick the winning set on one line.

                      I would have to add rules for each different matrix, I have no free time as it is and this is something that

                      would take a lot of time to develop

                      RL

                      Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

                      I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

                      they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

                      USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

                        US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

                        Avatar
                        Krakow
                        Poland
                        Member #86302
                        February 2, 2010
                        859 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: August 1, 2012, 6:13 am - IP Logged

                        Hi Guys

                        There are millions of ways to set the filters which will return zero sets.  The task of adding the ability

                        to find/show a conflict before the run process would be very hard to code for the following reasons.

                        Lets say that you have DO set to 2/2 and  and DE set to 2/2 and MD set to 2/3.  The code would say

                        that all 3 values need to be changed while any one of them could be adjusted to make the other 2 work.

                        The bigger problem would be if these settings caused a bunch of other filters to also conflict, You might

                        end up with 15 values showing a problem all based on one of the 3 above meaning that you would need

                        to sort through them all looking for the problem.   To automate the process to tell you which filter or filters

                        need to be changed, well, I think it would be easier to build a program to pick the winning set on one line.

                        I would have to add rules for each different matrix, I have no free time as it is and this is something that

                        would take a lot of time to develop

                        RL

                        Guys,

                        I think you expect too much. The thing is it's pretty easy. When after setting your filters you get 0 sets, it simply means that at least two filters are in coonflict with each other. Looking at a few of them and setting them either a bit wider or changing one value will give you sets.

                         

                        Adam

                          Avatar
                          Eugene Oregan
                          United States
                          Member #128629
                          May 29, 2012
                          419 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: August 1, 2012, 7:53 am - IP Logged

                          Guys,

                          I think you expect too much. The thing is it's pretty easy. When after setting your filters you get 0 sets, it simply means that at least two filters are in coonflict with each other. Looking at a few of them and setting them either a bit wider or changing one value will give you sets.

                           

                          Adam

                          Adam,

                          This might be a dumb question but i will ask anyway when you say run wide open do you mean,/ Min 0 and Max 9/ ex/ Min 0 ID 9 Max./  So if i ran the same filter say Min /1 ID 2 Max/ that would be very tight, and/ Min 8 ID 9 Max/ would be very open.  Sorry just need to know.  dld


                            United States
                            Member #110594
                            May 8, 2011
                            885 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: August 1, 2012, 8:56 am - IP Logged

                            I hear you. I have the same issue about conflicting filters and trying to figure out which ones are conflicting.

                              Avatar
                              Krakow
                              Poland
                              Member #86302
                              February 2, 2010
                              859 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: August 1, 2012, 10:46 am - IP Logged

                              Adam,

                              This might be a dumb question but i will ask anyway when you say run wide open do you mean,/ Min 0 and Max 9/ ex/ Min 0 ID 9 Max./  So if i ran the same filter say Min /1 ID 2 Max/ that would be very tight, and/ Min 8 ID 9 Max/ would be very open.  Sorry just need to know.  dld

                              dld,

                              I do not think this is a dumb question. There's a difference between running filters wide open and running them a bit wider. Let's say you did a very tight setup and got no sets. One of the elements of the setup might be setting DO=0. By running them wider I mean setting them to the range 0-2, which in most cases is correct. Setting them wide open would be the range 0-3 which covers almost anything which happened in the game.

                              As to problems with setup which produces no sets there are a couple of checkpoints.

                              1. You can have conflicting values in DO, DE and MD

                              2. Your ID may be in conflict with digits you selected to play/ block.

                              3. Your TB may have conflicting values with what you selected for base digits and higher ones.

                              4. DO may be in conflict with O/N

                              5. RD may be in conflict with the digits selected

                              6. LT and UT may be in conflict with groups selected to play/ block

                              7. TG may be in conflict with groups selected 

                              8. Decades may be in conflict with the selected groups

                              9. E/D , O/D may be in conflict with the selected digits, DO and O/N

                              10. DB may be in conflict with the settings of  base digits

                               

                              That's not all of it, but as you can see it's pretty easy to do a setup which will produce 0 sets.

                               

                              Adam

                                 
                                Page 62 of 140