Frenchie
I know at the start that the excitement can get a little out of hand and once the real play begins several
may droup out. The comming battle is going to be tough even for the most experienced players and some
may have expectations are not grounded in the real world. It may be six months before we see some big
wins and maybe not even then. One persons settings could keep everyone from winning, once we start I do
not think it will be a good idea to post who done what because we don't want people pointing the finger.
If someone over the course of time however does not pull there weight then they may not asked to continue.
This I think would be the only fair way to go. We should allow others that are interested the opportunity to
submit choices which could be monitered over time and then invite them in as some fall out or quit along the
way. I can hit the suggest button and get 80% or more correct without input from anyone. Before I invest
my money I want to know that others are going to do there very best. I was thinking that winsum should
be allowed to skip submissions because he is going to be very busy running things. He can submit anything
he wants to but we should not require it of him. Some people are jack of all trades and some become very
good at what they do but they are not specialist. Using the words specialist and lottery in the same sentence
is more than likely an oxymoron but I think people understand what I am saying. We will get everything worked
out or maybe we won't but I hope we all have some fun in the process. Who knows, I may get booted off as
time goes along.
RL