Texas United States
Member #86,151
January 30, 2010
1,889 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Ronnie316 on Jun 12, 2012
No problem,
I want to post the 49,140 lines on the blog and see how they do for about 10-12 draws. I don't see any harm in that?? I'm not sure if I can actually post that many lines, but once I get them on my computer I can either post them or outline what they are.
The objective is to at least TRY to hit to a JP.
It is hard for me to believe that there are so many people on here that either DONT WANT (anti-capitalists) to hit a JP or are soooooo negative about the possibility of hitting one..........
If med can play 175,000 lines and give up, it seems 49,140 would be small in comparison.
Besides Ive got "Thriftys positive energy flow system" working for me and I plan on giving him some credit when I start hitting JPs and of course LP for making it possible. lol.
Nope, there's no harm in it at all and the only thing that's beats a failure is a TRY. I really don't see that people here are negative. Rather, they're realists when it comes to tons and tons of odds against them along with the hope of a possibility to still win. Truth be known, this is what keeps people playing, and, the lotteries in business...some will win and some won't.
Now, regarding the math in your lines...and don't take this the wrong way, okay. You want to play approximately 50,000 lines, which is less than 1/3 the lines med played and nothing came out of his. If we put a dollar amount on these figures, we're talkin' roughly only $100K for yours ($2 per line) and $350K for his. Make no mistake, I'm not saying it's impossible but, history has proven that substantially less money can and has secured the prize...much less than even $100.
However, I understand your goal and I'm rooting for at least (5) numbers. Just remember, if you do hit for the JP or the $1mil, you must then come up with the money to run it live so you'll know it wasn't a fluke. I really like your drive, and, if the odds only matched your and others drive here, there would be lots of millionaires on this site.
United States
Member #116,263
September 7, 2011
20,243 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Lucky Loser on Jun 12, 2012
Nope, there's no harm in it at all and the only thing that's beats a failure is a TRY. I really don't see that people here are negative. Rather, they're realists when it comes to tons and tons of odds against them along with the hope of a possibility to still win. Truth be known, this is what keeps people playing, and, the lotteries in business...some will win and some won't.
Now, regarding the math in your lines...and don't take this the wrong way, okay. You want to play approximately 50,000 lines, which is less than 1/3 the lines med played and nothing came out of his. If we put a dollar amount on these figures, we're talkin' roughly only $100K for yours ($2 per line) and $350K for his. Make no mistake, I'm not saying it's impossible but, history has proven that substantially less money can and has secured the prize...much less than even $100.
However, I understand your goal and I'm rooting for at least (5) numbers. Just remember, if you do hit for the JP or the $1mil, you must then come up with the money to run it live so you'll know it wasn't a fluke. I really like your drive, and, if the odds only matched your and others drive here, there would be lots of millionaires on this site.
L.L.
Thanks LL,
When I say negativity I'm talking more about the prevailing idea that there is no way to find better odds in certain groups of combinations. In the end I may get proven wrong just like everyone else but it wont stop me from trying and believing that BECAUSE THE BALL ARE NUMBERED the event is not COMPLETELY random.
I do need to produce the lines though, in order to prove what I'm playing prior to the draws. I have never used Note Pad or any other type of software, lol, I thought I was doing real good using the combination generator to get the 5/28 combinations. lol.
My objective is to wheel all the even numbers using a 2 frequency and then "time" when I believe all even numbers will be drawn. OK, it sounds crazy but I'm betting on the next 10 draws (or so). Of course if it hits I will have a 50/50 chance of 5 out of 5 using the 2 frequency. AND I will still be fighting 1 in 46 mega ball odds by rotating all 46 into the lines.
Also note that I will only play Mega Ball, so 49,140 lines will be $49,140. dollars.
Tonight could be the night. Remember, you heard it here first. LOL.
mid-Ohio United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
20,272 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Ronnie316 on Jun 12, 2012
No problem,
I want to post the 49,140 lines on the blog and see how they do for about 10-12 draws. I don't see any harm in that?? I'm not sure if I can actually post that many lines, but once I get them on my computer I can either post them or outline what they are.
The objective is to at least TRY to hit to a JP.
It is hard for me to believe that there are so many people on here that either DONT WANT (anti-capitalists) to hit a JP or are soooooo negative about the possibility of hitting one..........
If med can play 175,000 lines and give up, it seems 49,140 would be small in comparison.
Besides Ive got "Thriftys positive energy flow system" working for me and I plan on giving him some credit when I start hitting JPs and of course LP for making it possible. lol.
Of the 1572 official MegaMillions drawings since its start in '96, only 41 had all even numbers in the first five:
NY United States
Member #23,834
October 16, 2005
4,772 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Ronnie316 on Jun 13, 2012
Thanks LL,
When I say negativity I'm talking more about the prevailing idea that there is no way to find better odds in certain groups of combinations. In the end I may get proven wrong just like everyone else but it wont stop me from trying and believing that BECAUSE THE BALL ARE NUMBERED the event is not COMPLETELY random.
I do need to produce the lines though, in order to prove what I'm playing prior to the draws. I have never used Note Pad or any other type of software, lol, I thought I was doing real good using the combination generator to get the 5/28 combinations. lol.
My objective is to wheel all the even numbers using a 2 frequency and then "time" when I believe all even numbers will be drawn. OK, it sounds crazy but I'm betting on the next 10 draws (or so). Of course if it hits I will have a 50/50 chance of 5 out of 5 using the 2 frequency. AND I will still be fighting 1 in 46 mega ball odds by rotating all 46 into the lines.
Also note that I will only play Mega Ball, so 49,140 lines will be $49,140. dollars.
Tonight could be the night. Remember, you heard it here first. LOL.
"When I say negativity I'm talking more about the prevailing idea that there is no way to find better odds in certain groups of combinations."
You're still confusing negativity and realism. There are two possibilities. One is that the drawing results are significantly non-random, but there's no reasonable evidence for that. The other is that there's some way to predict the resuts of a random event. Believing that's possible makes other ideas that are on the fringe look completely mainstream. It defies everything that's known by people who actually understand how it works.
You'll notice in 2005 and 2011 not one combinations had all even numbers.
Thanks for this post RJ,
I'm glad to see your information gathering abilities. lol. I was looking through "past 25 results" page by page to see these results. lol. I'm sure it sounds stupid to be behind the techlogy curve but some of us just are.
United States
Member #116,263
September 7, 2011
20,243 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by KY Floyd on Jun 13, 2012
"When I say negativity I'm talking more about the prevailing idea that there is no way to find better odds in certain groups of combinations."
You're still confusing negativity and realism. There are two possibilities. One is that the drawing results are significantly non-random, but there's no reasonable evidence for that. The other is that there's some way to predict the resuts of a random event. Believing that's possible makes other ideas that are on the fringe look completely mainstream. It defies everything that's known by people who actually understand how it works.
Im not the one who is confused KY,
You are not alone in using the excuse of "realism" as a cover for your stubborn and close minded attitude. Unless you are talking about a coin toss, there is almost never ONLY two possibilities. If you would stop and consider what I ACUALLY SAID you would realize that the event is not "completely" random.....
BECAUSE THE BALL ARE NUMBERED the event is not COMPLETELY random
United States
Member #116,263
September 7, 2011
20,243 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by KY Floyd on Jun 13, 2012
BECAUSE THE BALL ARE NUMBERED the event is not COMPLETELY random
Yes, perhaps I shouldn't describe you as confused.
If you want to lower yourself to personal attacks, then by all means go right ahead and be my guest.
All I'm saying is that the draw event is not COMPLETLY random. You maybe correct for the most part and the event could be 99.99999% random, but I DONT KNOW and you don't know either.
If everything everyone every THOUGHT THEY KNEW TO BE FACT was true we would still be walking on a flat earth and traveling by foot. Not to mention the fact that you would be sending me a letter instead of talking to me here,