Santee United States
Member #75,435
June 3, 2009
4 Posts
Offline
You are full of it (you know what "it" is).
If what you have said were true, you would be sipping drinks on the beach of your personal island right now. Not talking to us on Lottery Post.
If you want to convince me of your plan/program/whatever, send me some of the cash each time you win. Since you will be very rich and not need the money anymore. :o)
As for me, I'll be satisfied when I can live off the interest of my winnings. Good luck everyone. May the best numbers win! :o)
Virginia United States
Member #73,816
April 25, 2009
173 Posts
Offline
I think he has some problems myself the way he talks and answers questions but he could be right about his "system". I have more then one system that will always return a profit. The more you invest in the numbers the larger the profit.
United States
Member #72,738
March 26, 2009
73 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by BobJones on Jun 6, 2009
I think he has some problems myself the way he talks and answers questions but he could be right about his "system". I have more then one system that will always return a profit. The more you invest in the numbers the larger the profit.
Long Island, NY United States
Member #57,410
January 3, 2008
446 Posts
Offline
Wow! 5779 views on this thread as of this post. Usually high viewership reflects interest. True?
We see folks like this come on to various forums like this all the time. It's really fun to even consider that these types of folks are legit.
Tell me LP old timers. Have any of them ever turned out to be the real thing and put there predictions on the line..and proven themselves correct? End up being for real? That would be cool.
Regardless, in short, I highly commend Todd for allowing it to continue. Very little useable information, but Matchmaker has conducted himself like a Gentlemen through 13 pages. Somtimes they don't.
Sunny California United States
Member #40,294
May 31, 2006
9,088 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by DownandDirty on Jun 6, 2009
Wow! 5779 views on this thread as of this post. Usually high viewership reflects interest. True?
We see folks like this come on to various forums like this all the time. It's really fun to even consider that these types of folks are legit.
Tell me LP old timers. Have any of them ever turned out to be the real thing and put there predictions on the line..and proven themselves correct? End up being for real? That would be cool.
Regardless, in short, I highly commend Todd for allowing it to continue. Very little useable information, but Matchmaker has conducted himself like a Gentlemen through 13 pages. Somtimes they don't.
Being a somewhat "old timer", most of these threads do turn out to be fluff. Such high views indicate that people are looking for that "miracle" system which doesn't exist, folks. The best you can hope for with any system is to better your odds. Matchmaker came on here full of vim and vigor with his system and even though people shot him down for not revealing his "secret" he still might have something. If I were Matchmaker, I wouldn't tell anyone my system either after the resistance he's been faced with here. I'm guilty of that myself and have to give kudos to Matchy for sticking it out this long. We have to remember what we're dealing with here, THE LOTTERY, a game of chance. No one has ever come up with a system that beats the odds all the time because it is impossible.
New York, NY United States
Member #39,470
May 16, 2006
2,820 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by lottolaughs on Jun 6, 2009
Being a somewhat "old timer", most of these threads do turn out to be fluff. Such high views indicate that people are looking for that "miracle" system which doesn't exist, folks. The best you can hope for with any system is to better your odds. Matchmaker came on here full of vim and vigor with his system and even though people shot him down for not revealing his "secret" he still might have something. If I were Matchmaker, I wouldn't tell anyone my system either after the resistance he's been faced with here. I'm guilty of that myself and have to give kudos to Matchy for sticking it out this long. We have to remember what we're dealing with here, THE LOTTERY, a game of chance. No one has ever come up with a system that beats the odds all the time because it is impossible.
Lottolaughs with all due respect I think you give Matchy too much credit.
1. It's not because he would not reveal details of his system that he got so much flack. I sympathize with the many reasons for not revealing the hows and why's of little systems. In fact Matchy proves a point I made some time ago--on LP you get more intention by merely suggesting you have a system than actually demonstrating it works (by posting sample numbers or using the predicvtion board or by posting details of how it works.).
2. Matchy got flack because he breached fundamental rules of etiquette. He apparently did not try to figure out the unwritten community rules (on LP we do have a strong sense of community) while respecting each other's rights to hold back on information. Matchy came here trying to get a business partner before offering anything to prove he had something worth partnering with.
3. The calm demeanor that Matchy displayed for the most part was to his credit. But if he is a good con artist (I am not suggesting he is) that's exactly what I would expect.
Could Match prove his detractors (yours truly the number 1) wrong? Possibly but highly unlikely. I am betting against Matchy being for real and I am betting bigtime and asking for no partners, because I feel so sure of my wager.
United States
Member #75,058
May 26, 2009
300 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by BobJones on Jun 6, 2009
I think he has some problems myself the way he talks and answers questions but he could be right about his "system". I have more then one system that will always return a profit. The more you invest in the numbers the larger the profit.
This falls directly in line with the old cliche, "There's more than one way to skin a cat." I only have one system but, many many ways of extracting profit from it. I agree with your last sentence.
United States
Member #75,058
May 26, 2009
300 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by ca-dreamin* on Jun 5, 2009
LOL OK I'm TOTALLY confused! Is this your system?
And it took you 12 pages to tell everyone what they already know? Except I wouldnt play an equal balance of "most common" "least common" numbers. But then again with 1,500 you can play a whole lot of everything!
Anthony read WIN D's posts about pick 3........a whole lot of good info! There's a few other good posts as well (sorry can't remember off the top of my head who wrote them)
Matchmaker I never doubted your system and by what you posted I see you've done your homework. I wish you the best with pick 3 and will gladly cheer you on! Keep us posted!
Hello Miss Dreamin'. First of all, quit worrying about that 1500 thing because I just threw that out there, okay. The information I offered to Anthony is baseline and fundamental if you want a fair chance at this game. You said you wouldn't play an "equal balance" of picks right? Taking the numbers for granted is the worse thing you can do because they always change. Trust me, I know who's doing what in this forum and there are some sharp people here.
Thanks for rooting me on and I won't disappoint...I promise! Only believe...only believe!!!!
United States
Member #75,058
May 26, 2009
300 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by lottolaughs on Jun 6, 2009
Being a somewhat "old timer", most of these threads do turn out to be fluff. Such high views indicate that people are looking for that "miracle" system which doesn't exist, folks. The best you can hope for with any system is to better your odds. Matchmaker came on here full of vim and vigor with his system and even though people shot him down for not revealing his "secret" he still might have something. If I were Matchmaker, I wouldn't tell anyone my system either after the resistance he's been faced with here. I'm guilty of that myself and have to give kudos to Matchy for sticking it out this long. We have to remember what we're dealing with here, THE LOTTERY, a game of chance. No one has ever come up with a system that beats the odds all the time because it is impossible.
I can tell that you're a very wise man, lotto. The last (3) words of your (4th) sentence will hold true to its' fullest...except the word MIGHT. Non- believers have always OUTWEIGHED the believers since the beginning of time. Guess what? Those few believers made it!!!! Stay tuned my friend.
United States
Member #75,058
May 26, 2009
300 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Fibonacci on Jun 6, 2009
Lottolaughs with all due respect I think you give Matchy too much credit.
1. It's not because he would not reveal details of his system that he got so much flack. I sympathize with the many reasons for not revealing the hows and why's of little systems. In fact Matchy proves a point I made some time ago--on LP you get more intention by merely suggesting you have a system than actually demonstrating it works (by posting sample numbers or using the predicvtion board or by posting details of how it works.).
2. Matchy got flack because he breached fundamental rules of etiquette. He apparently did not try to figure out the unwritten community rules (on LP we do have a strong sense of community) while respecting each other's rights to hold back on information. Matchy came here trying to get a business partner before offering anything to prove he had something worth partnering with.
3. The calm demeanor that Matchy displayed for the most part was to his credit. But if he is a good con artist (I am not suggesting he is) that's exactly what I would expect.
Could Match prove his detractors (yours truly the number 1) wrong? Possibly but highly unlikely. I am betting against Matchy being for real and I am betting bigtime and asking for no partners, because I feel so sure of my wager.
Fibonacci, Fibonacci...ooohhhh Fibonacci. You will surely lose this wager. I'll match whatever you have on it and "double" it...
United States
Member #75,058
May 26, 2009
300 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by twincity on Jun 6, 2009
bob, chill !!!yeah he/she is full of it.
we had a saying in school,it goes like this
organize and produce.
not 1 did matchmaker fall through.
f him/she
word!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
my bad Lp.
Go back to school son. Go back to school...you have a lot to learn. I've forgotten more about numbers than you're still learning!!!! Trust me on that!!
United States
Member #75,058
May 26, 2009
300 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by DownandDirty on Jun 6, 2009
Wow! 5779 views on this thread as of this post. Usually high viewership reflects interest. True?
We see folks like this come on to various forums like this all the time. It's really fun to even consider that these types of folks are legit.
Tell me LP old timers. Have any of them ever turned out to be the real thing and put there predictions on the line..and proven themselves correct? End up being for real? That would be cool.
Regardless, in short, I highly commend Todd for allowing it to continue. Very little useable information, but Matchmaker has conducted himself like a Gentlemen through 13 pages. Somtimes they don't.
D&D, thanks for the boost! All I will say is grab your Gin & Juice...it's about to get real interesting in this place.