Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 9, 2016, 6:13 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

PICK 4,5,6 Cracked - New System

Topic closed. 249 replies. Last post 5 years ago by lottoburg.

Page 9 of 17
47
PrintE-mailLink
Avatar
bgonçalves
Brasil
Member #92564
June 9, 2010
2125 Posts
Offline
Posted: November 27, 2011, 10:15 pm - IP Logged
Hello. winsu, very good job, now you can see what the best trio in their position, the other two numbers (when a 5 lottery numbers) is put in position, you can do
1.2 up to 10 pairs and trios together with put or two missing at random,
Gary, through the statistics you can see the trios that have not yet emerged, tabem pick3 can use to see the endings (final digit from 0 to 9). That is, you can use the study of endings like a pick3 in trios.
    Developer's avatar - logo2 small.jpg
    Somerset
    United Kingdom
    Member #9710
    December 17, 2004
    184 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: November 28, 2011, 4:59 am - IP Logged

    Performing ball placement probability as people are doing here on LP is correct but only for the first ball a user selects.

    When a user selects a ball it is removed from the original pool, looking at the statistics of the new pool it can then be seen that the distributions for all combinations then change.

    To correctly analyse lotteries using ball placement probability you need to recalculate the distributions after any change is made to the pool.

    The way people are doing it on LP is assuming the pool remains fixed even after a ball has been removed, hence the more balls a user selects the more skewed the output data becomes.

    I have been away for a few days so I have not had the chance to work on this however I will shortly be producing an example that takes all factors into account to demonstrate the control and manipulation of lottery statistics using ball placement probability theory.

    Jamie

    It has been said every software has a bug in it, it has also been said that every program can be reduced by one line of code.

    There for any program can be reduced to 1 line that dont work.

      Developer's avatar - logo2 small.jpg
      Somerset
      United Kingdom
      Member #9710
      December 17, 2004
      184 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: November 28, 2011, 5:16 am - IP Logged

      Performing ball placement probability as people are doing here on LP is correct but only for the first ball a user selects.

      When a user selects a ball it is removed from the original pool, looking at the statistics of the new pool it can then be seen that the distributions for all combinations then change.

      To correctly analyse lotteries using ball placement probability you need to recalculate the distributions after any change is made to the pool.

      The way people are doing it on LP is assuming the pool remains fixed even after a ball has been removed, hence the more balls a user selects the more skewed the output data becomes.

      I have been away for a few days so I have not had the chance to work on this however I will shortly be producing an example that takes all factors into account to demonstrate the control and manipulation of lottery statistics using ball placement probability theory.

      Jamie

      This is why it has taken me just under two years to work out how to handle, the number of possible combinations involved in performing such a task, it becomes massive.

      As a software developer waiting 4 hours for the machine to recalculate is not an option so I set out two years ago to create an algorithm to perform this feat and fast.

      Please remember although this way of analysing lotteries is new to most of you, I have been working on this for two years. There are many things someone can do with this information if you spend the time and study it in detail.

      My goal is to produce an application that can give virtually any real world statistic on an original pool of numbers and any subset of those numbers.

      One by-product of my research is noticing how wheels can be created using the minimum lines, now my machine is free it has been put to work simplifying an equation for wheels, hopefully it won't take two years this time but you never know.

      It has been said every software has a bug in it, it has also been said that every program can be reduced by one line of code.

      There for any program can be reduced to 1 line that dont work.

        Developer's avatar - logo2 small.jpg
        Somerset
        United Kingdom
        Member #9710
        December 17, 2004
        184 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: November 28, 2011, 5:52 am - IP Logged

        To accentuate the odds changing I am including an example of what really happens when a ball is removed from the original pool. 

        --------------------------------------------------------------

         

        Pick 6 from 40 - 3,838,380 to 1

         

        6 of 6                              1 in 3,838,380

        5 of 6                              1 in 18,815.5882

        4 of 6                              1 in 456.1355

        3 of 6                              1 in 32.0720

        2 of 6                              1 in 5.5178

        Overall odds                1 in 4.658567

         

        Remove a ball the new pool becomes

        --------------------------------------------------------------

         

        Pick 5 from 39 - 575,757 to 1

         

        5 of 5                              1 in 575,757

        4 of 5                              1 in 3,386.8059

        3 of 5                              1 in 102.6305

        2 of 5                              1 in 9.6216

        Overall odds                1 in 8.773975

         

         

        The above is fairly simple to work out, however we are now thinking ball placement.

         

        When a ball is removed the new pool must take into account the best odds of the final numeric position of the ball removed when all numbers are drawn.

        The new pool when calculated must eliminate the ball and ball position removed to keep the statistics correct, this is where the calculations grow exponentially.

        It has been said every software has a bug in it, it has also been said that every program can be reduced by one line of code.

        There for any program can be reduced to 1 line that dont work.

          Developer's avatar - logo2 small.jpg
          Somerset
          United Kingdom
          Member #9710
          December 17, 2004
          184 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: November 28, 2011, 6:38 am - IP Logged

          To give people a better understanding I am going to share a little more.

          Thinking ball placement.

          Removing a ball from a distribution knocks a hole in that distribution in the position the ball was removed from, although the last posts stats are true it does not give you a true picture, remember we are thinking ball placement probability. The new distribution must eliminate the final numeric position you have chosen for the first ball chosen and removed. So to give a true ball placement probability statistic of the next set of positions and combinations the new pool when calculated must take into account all possible combinations eliminated by removing the first ball and all possible final numeric positions eliminated.

          This cannot be done in one hit for a number of reasons.

          Example, let's take a pick 6 draw and perform a 3 ball placement probability analysis

          1. There are 20 ways to arrange 3 balls, depending on the 3 balls selected each one of the 3 balls can be distributed in a different way and have different hit ratios for each number in the 3.
          2. Eliminating one ball from the original pool of 6 knocks out many possible sub combinations and final numeric positions for the smaller sub combinations such as the 3 hit combos.
          3. For the above reasons when using ball placement probability you must always start with the biggest combinations and work down the pools.

          It has been said every software has a bug in it, it has also been said that every program can be reduced by one line of code.

          There for any program can be reduced to 1 line that dont work.

            Avatar
            New Member

            United States
            Member #90563
            April 30, 2010
            9 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: November 28, 2011, 1:49 pm - IP Logged

            Hello Developer,

            I mentioned some of this before. I don't mean to be rude, but I don't know why all the calculations you talk about are necessary.

            Unless you Have to calculate in real time on the fly, I don't see why you can't do all of the calculations before hand.

            If you take the lotto that you are working with and wheel all of the combinations for it. You should just be able to count how each number comes up with each other number in each position and make a ranking.

            For example if the first number is no. 1 in position 1(as it has to be), then what numbers come up with it in order in position 2. Then what numbers come up with those numbers(each done seperately), and what one come up with them, until you get to the last position with number starting with no. 1.

            Then rank them by quantity or math.

            You move down the list of numbers until all numbers in the complete wheel are covered.

            That will give you a ranked list of all numbers that can be drawn for that lotto.

            Now when you take a list of numbers that you want to wheel or put together the best tickets for, all you have to do is wheel that list of numbers and compare them to your index for that lotto and save their rank. Then sort that ranking from high to low to get the best fitting ticket numbers from your list of numbers that you want to use.

            I don't see any reason to do all of your calculation every time that you take a number out since all of the combinations that can be made for that lotto are known. The ranking of each combination in your lotto will stay the same. It can not, and will not change. It is a static, known quality.

            Thank you,

            Jerry

              garyo1954's avatar - garyo
              Dallas, Texas
              United States
              Member #4549
              May 2, 2004
              1730 Posts
              Online
              Posted: November 28, 2011, 2:05 pm - IP Logged

              Curious here. What you are describing is hypergeometric distribution.

              Before the drawing starts, the odds in any 5/39 game are 1 in 575757. On any one line, you have a 5 in 39 chance of hitting that first ball.

              If you don't have the first ball, your odds don't improve. (Not to mention you are not going to win the big pot.)

              If you match the first ball, you move on to the 4/38 category where you have a 1 in 73815 chance of hitting the second ball. (If you don't hit that, no second tier prize.)

              But if you do, you move to the category 3/37 or 1 in 7770 chance of hitting three digits. And so it goes.

              In my mind, hypergeometric distribution doesn't occur until you match one ball. In other words, your odds don't improve until you hit at least one ball.

              I'm confused how it could be otherwise.

              And from what you are saying today, every number should be checked against every other number to see which pair best in the global matrix. Unfortunately, it seemed to me that had been bypassed in charting and basing our percentage on the complete pair and triplets groupings.

              What I'm hearing is ,"IF I hit this number, I now have the best possibility of hitting the next one."

              This takes us back to page one where the general consensus was the best numbers and pairs do not always hit.



                Avatar
                bgonçalves
                Brasil
                Member #92564
                June 9, 2010
                2125 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: November 28, 2011, 2:30 pm - IP Logged
                Hello,GARYO a lottery of 37 / 5, the high frequency of repetition of triplets, it would be
                A base, then trios of 7770 possible, many will repeat more times than others,
                You can see one of the trios of 7770 lottery 37 / 5, trios more repeat and how often, and need not close with it in the trios just grab the 100% more repeat the trios trios probabílistacamente that are better, because gary trios that have almost never never come out, and hitting the trio, only missing two numbers, in its two positions.
                  RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
                  mid-Ohio
                  United States
                  Member #9
                  March 24, 2001
                  19830 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: November 28, 2011, 2:33 pm - IP Logged

                  Hello Developer,

                  I mentioned some of this before. I don't mean to be rude, but I don't know why all the calculations you talk about are necessary.

                  Unless you Have to calculate in real time on the fly, I don't see why you can't do all of the calculations before hand.

                  If you take the lotto that you are working with and wheel all of the combinations for it. You should just be able to count how each number comes up with each other number in each position and make a ranking.

                  For example if the first number is no. 1 in position 1(as it has to be), then what numbers come up with it in order in position 2. Then what numbers come up with those numbers(each done seperately), and what one come up with them, until you get to the last position with number starting with no. 1.

                  Then rank them by quantity or math.

                  You move down the list of numbers until all numbers in the complete wheel are covered.

                  That will give you a ranked list of all numbers that can be drawn for that lotto.

                  Now when you take a list of numbers that you want to wheel or put together the best tickets for, all you have to do is wheel that list of numbers and compare them to your index for that lotto and save their rank. Then sort that ranking from high to low to get the best fitting ticket numbers from your list of numbers that you want to use.

                  I don't see any reason to do all of your calculation every time that you take a number out since all of the combinations that can be made for that lotto are known. The ranking of each combination in your lotto will stay the same. It can not, and will not change. It is a static, known quality.

                  Thank you,

                  Jerry

                  "I mentioned some of this before. I don't mean to be rude, but I don't know why all the calculations you talk about are necessary."

                  I think it's more important to prove the theory has merit before deciding if all the calculations are necessary.  If the theory has no more merit than picking numbers randomly then no amount of calculating is going to help.

                   * you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket * 
                     
                               Evil Looking       

                    Avatar
                    New Member

                    United States
                    Member #90563
                    April 30, 2010
                    9 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: November 28, 2011, 3:31 pm - IP Logged

                    Hello RJOh,

                    I don't disagree with you, but it is not what I was takling about.

                    If the implimentation of the theory is made easier, then it is easier to prove or disprove.

                    If the lotto that you like was indexed as I mentioned, then the past wins could be checked to see if they match the theory.

                    But even then, we wouldn't know it would work with smaller number groups.

                    Though Monte Carlo  analysis could be done for testing. 

                    Until then, as you say, it is just theory that sounds plausible.

                    Much like your own negative theory that is also unproven.

                    Regards,

                    Jerry

                      Developer's avatar - logo2 small.jpg
                      Somerset
                      United Kingdom
                      Member #9710
                      December 17, 2004
                      184 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: November 28, 2011, 3:38 pm - IP Logged

                      Curious here. What you are describing is hypergeometric distribution.

                      Before the drawing starts, the odds in any 5/39 game are 1 in 575757. On any one line, you have a 5 in 39 chance of hitting that first ball.

                      If you don't have the first ball, your odds don't improve. (Not to mention you are not going to win the big pot.)

                      If you match the first ball, you move on to the 4/38 category where you have a 1 in 73815 chance of hitting the second ball. (If you don't hit that, no second tier prize.)

                      But if you do, you move to the category 3/37 or 1 in 7770 chance of hitting three digits. And so it goes.

                      In my mind, hypergeometric distribution doesn't occur until you match one ball. In other words, your odds don't improve until you hit at least one ball.

                      I'm confused how it could be otherwise.

                      And from what you are saying today, every number should be checked against every other number to see which pair best in the global matrix. Unfortunately, it seemed to me that had been bypassed in charting and basing our percentage on the complete pair and triplets groupings.

                      What I'm hearing is ,"IF I hit this number, I now have the best possibility of hitting the next one."

                      This takes us back to page one where the general consensus was the best numbers and pairs do not always hit.



                      Spot on Garyo1954, you seem to have a good understanding of statisitics, I am not postiing all my work right now for odvious reasons, the holes you are finding are not missed in my research just in this forum for now.

                      This is a theory, theories need proving.

                      I need fully understand all possible statistics in a draw, that's where I am at now, trying to achieve full statistic analysis of any lotto to prove my hypothesis step at a time.

                      As you point out this route I am currently working on would require each ball to appear for the path to work. I understand that in real world results that event would be very unlikely, but it's not my goal to make a system to hit all numbers, infact I am not even making a system.... more later, don't run before you can walk so to speak.

                      It is necessary for me to calculate every possible path to fully understand the statistics so I can then start simplifying with the entire results.

                      Just to be clear on what I mean by every possible path, (6 balls - 1, 5 ball -1, 4 balls - 1, 3 balls - 1) would be a path, each set is reduced and the remaining numbers used in the next set. (millions of possibles)

                      It has been said every software has a bug in it, it has also been said that every program can be reduced by one line of code.

                      There for any program can be reduced to 1 line that dont work.

                        Developer's avatar - logo2 small.jpg
                        Somerset
                        United Kingdom
                        Member #9710
                        December 17, 2004
                        184 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: November 29, 2011, 6:53 pm - IP Logged

                        Here are last weekends UK lotto results broken down displaying all possible 3 ball placements

                        • Draw Name: United Kingdom Lotto
                        • Draw Type: Pick 6 from 49
                        • Draw Number: 408
                        • Draw Date: 26 November 2011
                        • Winning Numbers: 13 16 25 26 36 46
                        • Bonus Ball: 15
                        • Draw Line: 11,786,210 of 13,983,816

                        -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                        Ball Placement

                        Key

                        P1-01 02 03=123___
                        P2-01 02 04=12_4__
                        P3-01 02 05=123_5_
                        P4-01 02 06=12___6
                        P5-01 03 04=1_34__
                        P6-01 03 05=1_3_5_
                        P7-01 03 06=1_3__6
                        P8-01 04 05=1__45_
                        P9-01 04 06=1__4_6
                        P10-01 05 06=1___56
                        P11-02 03 04=_234__
                        P12-02 03 05=_23_5_
                        P13-02 03 06=_23__6
                        P14-02 04 05=_2_45_
                        P15-02 04 06=_2_4_6
                        P16-02 05 06=_2__56
                        P17-03 04 05=__345_
                        P18-03 04 06=__34_6
                        P19-03 05 06=__3_56
                        P20-04 05 06=___456

                        It has been said every software has a bug in it, it has also been said that every program can be reduced by one line of code.

                        There for any program can be reduced to 1 line that dont work.

                          Developer's avatar - logo2 small.jpg
                          Somerset
                          United Kingdom
                          Member #9710
                          December 17, 2004
                          184 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: November 29, 2011, 7:12 pm - IP Logged

                          I am currently analysing every possible combination in all draws in the above manor, the results that I am collecting are being saved and then analysed.

                          Once complete for all draws 3,4 and 5 ball combinations in all pick 4,5 and 6 draws I will be able to analysis wheels against the data and see what makes them work. Form this I believe I will be able to write a wheel generator that can make any wheel the user wants using the minimum lines possible and have the math to prove that fact.

                          I will also be able to analysis past draw data in a depth never seen before, seeking patterns and trends, applied with my LOWESS regression algorithm I believe there won't be any statistics left unturned.

                          It has been said every software has a bug in it, it has also been said that every program can be reduced by one line of code.

                          There for any program can be reduced to 1 line that dont work.

                            Developer's avatar - logo2 small.jpg
                            Somerset
                            United Kingdom
                            Member #9710
                            December 17, 2004
                            184 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: November 29, 2011, 7:29 pm - IP Logged

                            Pick 4 ball placements

                            Here is the 4 combo break down of last weeks uk lotto

                            It has been said every software has a bug in it, it has also been said that every program can be reduced by one line of code.

                            There for any program can be reduced to 1 line that dont work.

                              lakerben's avatar - spherewall
                              New Mexico
                              United States
                              Member #86099
                              January 29, 2010
                              11119 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: November 29, 2011, 8:24 pm - IP Logged

                              Impressive.  Where do I get this software ?  Anyhow after a long day I just  did a substitution,subtraction,mutiplication,factor workout on a napkin at the local circle k.  I hope its a winner.  I used it for the New Mexico cash 5 and Mega Millions.  The brain cells were churning and maybe I'm a winner who knows. Peace and keep up the good work.

                               

                              Idea

                                 
                                Page 9 of 17