Nice!
@Oldghost - I'll check that out sometime tonight, and do some math.
@ Jasefan - Wow, well that doesn't surprise me. The odds of hitting $1m on that game were pretty <snip> good, and the overall odds of 1 in 2 made it so that playing that game could be sustainable. The $100 prizes were fairly easy to hit as well. That game was designed perfectly for the player.
@ Gators - Wow, I didn't think anything could be harder to scratch than $20 LFL. If the $2 Electric 8s lasts any longer, I'd hate to see what that ticket would end up being like a couple years from now.
Also, I do agree with you that I wouldn't mind if they got rid of the $5M prize on Gold Rush Doubler and made the $1M prize easier to hit. (or $1m and/or $100k prize). In fact, doing so would be strategic to keep the demand on other $20 games while attracting customers toward the new Gold Rush for the common $500 wins and attainable $100k - $1m dream hits. Still, 1 in 179 is pretty <snip> good.
@ PendingSector, haha well I hope you find yourself a huge winner like that soon. Perhaps on one of the new upcoming ticket.
After looking at the new $5 Platinum 7s, it seems to be the same old Super 7s with a new design/name. Why do people love the $5 Super 7s so much?
I think I might play with $60 on Tuesday when the new tickets come out, and might go with 2 of the new Gold Rush, 2 of the Platinum 7s, and 5 of the new $2 ticket.
This post has been automatically changed by the Lottery Post computer system to remove inappropriate content and/or spam.