"So which is it?"
I'll try to explain the issues that deal with probability. If you can't understand simple English you'll have to look for help somewhere else.
"How do you know they didn't use the same machines when the 9's hit 8 days in a row.?"
Because I actually understand probability and can do the math.
"Keep asking me stupid questions"
The only reason you think they're stupid is because they're either questions you're unable to answer, or because the answers don't agree with your delusions.
"Only you and many others would actually believe it's still 50/50 after let's say about 10 flips."
Well, those "many others" are the people who aren't morons, so at least I'm in good company. Of course we "believe" that because it's a fact that's supported by millions and millions of actual tests, rather than a delusion we wallow in simply because we're morons who are too stupid to pay attention to the vast and incontrovertible evidence. FWIW, the tests are so easy that you could do your own.
"The very idea that they're claiming a random process while clearly taking preventive measures which disrupt 'true randomness' is the concern for us. "
The idea may bother you, but it's based on a delusion. The lotteries want to keep things random, because that's in their own best interests.
"As another member has accurately identified, they're real goal is too minimize what they pay out"
The goal of the lotteries is to rely on randomness so that probability will do what it does.
"When you play with the machine before the official draw, things change."
What things change, and how do they change? We get that if the results of test drawing aren't published it means that some of you don't have all of the (useless) data, but what changes that actually affects the results of the official drawing?
"I'm still unable to process how some of these folks are failing to see how tampering with the balls affects things which are unseen yet expected. The balls are numbered and are naturally obligated to do certain things"
Are you unable to process how we fail to see unicorns, too? The balls aren't obligated to do anything except obey the laws of physics. They roll or fall downhill due to gravity, they accelerate when they're hit by something, and they're affected by friction. And of course the lottery doesn't tamper with the balls.
"You don't seem to understand my point."
Nobody understands your "points" Some people agree with them, and the rest of us recognize them for the incoherent ramblings that they are. It's a lot like hearing somebody who's off their meds talking to themselves on the sidewalk. We recognize all of the words (well, we recognize the real words), but that doesn't mean they make any sense the way they're strung together or that they're based in reality.
"I don't get anything you're saying."
That's one of the problems with listening to people with delusions about how random probability works. They come up with nonsensical ideas that only make sense to them.
"This analogy sucked."
It was probably intended to be as stupid as your question about casinos conducting tests before each individual game. A better analogy would have been to ask if you'd go to a restaurant that cooked what you ordered 4 or 5 times before cooking the one they sent out to you. It's a better analogy because cooking a bunch of test orders first would waste a bunch of time without having any other effect on the food that was cooked and served to you, just as all the pre-testing, whether they're done by the lottery or a casino don't change the results of the game.
"Now I'm done."
Or not.