Not bragging or looking for a pat on the back, but anyone who can win Pick 4 four times in less than a month is doing something right.
Yes, it is good if a player can win four times in a month but, this is also a case where all the numbers matter when discussing a win. As I said before, how long, how many plays, and the cost of each play wagered will reveal the true performance of your 'substitution method' without any error. I think maybe I wasn't clear enough on the type of math needed to measure a player's approach which got me sideways with you.Until you apply a real time cost+duration+win type(payout), you'll never know where you're really at.
We all know that the only folks who win more than they've lost are the jackpot winners, or the corporations
This is completely false and I say it with 100% certainty.
I'll use the winnings to pay for future plays,
Yes, but how much of those winnings is actually raw profit? See, when a player does win, they're not actually profiting that entire payout, dude,. A certain percentage of that is the true profit given they aren't so far in the hole they can't see daylight. In other words, even if we give you the four wins you speak of @ $200 each over the last month, your profit isn't $800, bobby, and this is where all the numbers matter.
I'll always be 'anti-math' because those concepts are 'man-made' fantasies.
Yeah, and lottery games are also man-made using the concept of math to arrive at their odds and probabilities. As such, a player can use those same numbers to develop their own system. You're a silly man, bobby.
However, now that I know how, I'll be posting copies of future winning tickets in the appropriate forum.
Yep, this is the standard. Post up winning tickets so everyone can see that you've finally won but, they still have absolutely no clue on what it costed to get there or if you actually made any money. A lot happens between wins, my friend, and will tell onlookers whether or not you really know what you're doing and if your stuff actually works well. All those Steve Players seem to omit the most important numbers needed when they post those supposedly winning tickets which are cost and duration of play. If you really want to validate your substitution method, bobby, share how much it costs you play each time until you win. Then, once you post a winner, they'll know exactly what to do in terms of MATHEMATICS.
The following link contains an accurate application of math around a simple ten day study of a random combo list which proved very interesting. I begin moderating on Page 8 and all my math is correct.
https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/276724/8
We can do the same thing with your method even if you change numbers every play. How about it? I'm sure lots of players would like to win four times per month. The list in the link above was hitting nearly every draw.
but I know the 'win streak' won't last.
Sounds like your disclaimer to me. Guess what? Math will show you how to fix it.