Hi everyone. (This is going to be quite a post, and you may or may not choose to read it all, but for me, it will be peace of mind to have my thoughts out there for generations to come and it will help me keep my mind occupied.) Sorry for the absence. I'm thinking that posting some will help get my mind off stuff and help all of us out a little also. So I'm going to be back on quite a bit more sharing. I've put so much time into this over the years. Breaks now and then of course, because of life, but still never got out of it completely. Once time was made that I could put as much time into it as I wanted, it started flowing a little more freely on what to do and what to look for. Building what I have has taken years I will say. Creating, fixing, making and the like has always been a big part of who I am. I just enjoy it. It's so much more fulfilling to me to create my own ideas and see them come to fruition. To test myself to see what I may or may not be capable of. I've never minded doing all the stuff that others may not see as easy. I never minded crawling into the dark, hot, deep hard to get to areas of pretty much anything. Snakes, spiders, dust dirt and grime never scared me from getting the job done. I've pulled wire up in attics that was so hot that I've had to undress, hand my clothes out to be rung out of the sweat and put them on and go back to work. Crawled into places so tight that I've had to shovel my way to get where I needed be and had snakes just look at me and shake their heads. (Not really on the snakes, although I have crawled around with a many of them.) It's just who I am to do what it takes to get it done.
Working on these games is just like everything else to me. You've got to put the time and work into it. And although it is setting with a keyboard and mouse, looking at a screen, it is work. It's the most work my brain has ever done. Getting the ideas to test and try and having to figure out how to make what your mind is seeing happen. Your body just setting for hours on end, or even days, trying to get those ideas working so you can see the results. It takes a toll on the brain and can burn you out. I have gotten back up to 170 pounds from not getting the exercising work that I'm used to everyday, although some of it is in the gut area. I don't much care for that, but with me, it's hard for me to put on weight the way I run, so at least I'm getting that out of it. But it's still stressful. Especially on the brain.
It had to start somewhere though. Any idea does. The more I've worked on it, the more I've seen and learned. The more I have learned, the more that has came to me on what to do next. It really has been one chain of events to another with it. My foundation started simple with these bigger games. Just a simple counting method of keeping track. That counting method made patterns, discernible patterns that could be used to identify what direction to take next. Once the layout of the "system" was made, the idea of knowing what happened where came to mind. So stats was run on the system. This was vital to ensure the quality of the system. You have to know what happens where to know what to look for next. Once that was made and tested that allowed me to trim off the excess fat. What wasn't needed was tossed. Gotten out of the way before any further ciphering was done. I had to dig and go to the outer reaches to get it back to the simplest form. It was the most necessary part of all of it and put what I've created where it is now. I've learned with working on this that you have to be mentally all in to make it happen. You have to have that mindset to accomplish anything. Good luck doesn't just happen to all of us. It sure hasn't to me.
This that I've created, is simplicity. It just looks complex. The thought process behind it is basic math. 1st grade education at best. What it does is it sets out your options per pick, in numeric order and not drawn order of course into 2 large groups. One group will be heralded as an odd group and another as an even group per picks 1 through 5. Inside each of those 2 groups, you will have 2 subsets of groups even and odd. So off the bat you have a set of odd options for pick 1 and a set of even options for pick 1. One of those two sets will have your next winning number in it. Under those 2 sets, you will have the 2 subsets that your next winning number will be in. Look at it as if you had a square that was halved vertically and horizontally. One of those 4 inner cubes will have your next winning number inside it. You just have to choose which one. What goes inside those sections depends on the stats that I've ran to know what to put in there to start with. If you take a 5/43 draw, you have options 1 thru 39 only that could be your smallest number. 2-40 as your second and so on. That means that you have 40 total options that could be your first pick. Then you have to choose from a lesser pool for the next and next picks. Depending on what you choose to start with. But why? Why have so many options for the smallest pick. How many times does 39 show up as the first number? 20 or above for that matter. I can tell you to the number how many times each does where. Why complicate the thought process and cause yourself the extra stress of having so many options? There is no need in it. I know that because of running stats, that there are 10 numbers that show up as the smallest pick 78.27% of the time here in 4,813 draws. Does that mean that those numbers are guaranteed to come up next? No, but that is a high percentage for a large pool of games. If you have 10 options to start with, and they are spread out into 4 sections, how much better is your chances of getting the smallest pick correct? Especially with that kind of percentage. There are times that you will see one section blank because of the inner math, so then you only have 3 cubes to look at.
Each of those 4 sections is then broken down into more subsets. It would be like adding vertical lines into the cube and inside those lines you have your winning number in one of them. There are actually 128 different subsets that would have to be in each single square. Mathematically that's what it would take. Through stats, I was able to find out that there is a WHOLE LOT of those subsets that has either, never happened or has happened only a handful of times. Why look at those? Doesn't mean it won't happen, but, it happens so little that if it does occur, you're not really missing but those few times. Tossed. Toss it out and don't cloud your brain with the meaningless. By cutting out the does not and seldom happens right off the bat, you are cutting your chances of a 5 of 5 down, but you ARE still leaving plenty of possible 5 of 5's left to win. I know that with a 4 cube system like this, that there should be on average 3 options per cube. That gives 12 options total. 12 is 3 summed and part of the 3/4 or 75% that I believe life is about. I won't get into all that right now, but it is important. I've ran so many thru tests with this at 3% to 6% per pick, that I pretty well know that now is another reason I say this. As it stands where I have this set to now, I know that ten numbers are 78.27% of the smallest pick. I know that thirteen numbers make up 65.33% of the second number. Fourteen make up 63.96% of the third. Thirteen makeup 50.10% of the fourth. Ten make up 62.46% of the fifth. That is through 4,813 draws. With that amount of options per pick, just for starters without any narrowing down or further filtering, I had for the full year of 2019, minus tonight's draw, 37 draws that I had 5 of 5 in my options with an average of 3 draws per month that all the winning numbers was there to start with. Doesn't sound like much? Try it at 1-39, 2-40, 3-41, 4-42 and 5-43. That is before filtering anything. There was 93 games that the 4 of 4 possibility was there and 124 times that a 3 of 3 was there. That's a total of 254 out of 364 games that I had at least a 3 of 3 showing with that little of options to start with.
For 2018, there was a total of 42 games with a 5 of 5 showing up with an average of 4 games per month. 90 4 of 4's and 121 3 of 3's. That's 253 games with at least a 3 of 3 possibility with few options.
2017 there was 48 games with an average of 4 games per month. 97 4 of 4's and 106 3 of 3's. That was 251 draws with at least a 3 of 3 before any filtering.
In total that was 127 games out of 1094 that I had a 5 of 5 showing up with few options and no filtering at all. With an average of 4 games a month it being there.
280 games with a 4 of 4 with an average of 8 games per month.
351 games with a 3 of 3 with an average of 10 games per month.
233 games with a 2 of 2 with an average of 6 games per month.
A whopping 102 of 1,094 draws that only a 1 of 5 showed up. That was an average of 3 games a month.
So you actually have better odds of a 5 of 5 showing up than a 1 of 5 with this. This is without any filtering down whatsoever. That is just by cutting out what has not happened much and only using what has the most.
Pick by position stats?
Out of 1,094 draws.
805 games the first pick was there. That's 73.52% of the draws. With 10 options to start with.
610 times the second pick was there. That's 55.7% of the time. With 13 options to start with.
664 times the third pick was there. That's 60.64% of the time. With 14 options to start with.
Only 496 times the fourth pick was there and that's 45.30% of the time. With 13 options to start with.
But 806 times the fifth pick was there. That's 73.61% of the time. With 10 options to start with.
With the way this is set up, it takes more numbers for the 3rd and 4th position to get those larger wins. I can actually cut the 2nd's options down some and still keep close to these results. What makes those two positions different I do not know. I do know that those 2 picks have less subsets inside the four sections of the cube than any other position. There is 23 subsets only in the 3rd pick position out of 128 subsets. With the next winning number showing up in 1 of 4 of those subsets over 90% of the time. It's a high 90%. With the 4th pick, there is only 27 out of 128 subsets again with the winning number showing up in 1 of 4 subsets over 90% of the time. There is 37 out of 128 subsets for the 2nd pick for example. Each pick has a different amount of subsets depending on their own statistics.
I have ran the 69 group set of the Powerball through this with the same results. Without the bonus ball figured in, because I'm not setup yet for the bonus ball, but the 5 white balls are showing similar results. A 5 of 5 is showing up about 3 times per month with about the same amount of options per pick. You do have to up the percentages on it a little which does give you a few more options per, but it's not that much of a difference. For 26 more balls, it's really not.
I know, this isn't telling anyone what to play. It is, I think however, showing that you can cut down your chances and actually win more than what they say the odds are. This is where my post in the math section came about. Those tests was ran using this theory to see just what it would take with just a guesstimate and actually having the numbers there that was drawn. That would have been having 3 numbers per cube, picking one number per cube to play per position and having the winning number in your 4 options per pick.
I know this is long. I know that not many will read it all. It is here though if anyone decides to. It's not really giving away how or what this does, but it could help someone set something up to build on. If they so chose to.
Happy New Year and best of luck to all!